| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
 |
|
Menu
| London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
| London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#30
June 25th 14, 10:03 PM
posted to uk.transport.london
|
|||
|
|||
TfL acknowledges contactless technology risk
On 25/06/2014 15:30, Steve Fitzgerald wrote:
In message , Tony Dragon writes The Freedom Pass also can clash (error 94 on the reader) That's (very) rarely a clash but a mis-read when someone waves their card about and expected the reader to magically read it. Freedom pass users are one of the worst offenders at this but not unique. A proper CPC clash is 70 or 71 which is reporting it's detected 2 cards or a read error. Those more observant of you may have noticed that recently the UTS gates have had a software upgrade and many of these codes now report a 'plain text' translation of the error code on the second text line. What does Error 80 mean, BTW? That is the code that I have experienced once or twice on the Contactless pilot programme. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| London Underground gate revenue protection technology | London Transport | |||
| "Flooding risk to Thames tunnels" | London Transport | |||
| New National Security Technology ignored that might have stopped the bombing | London Transport | |||
| Technology for its own sake? | London Transport | |||
Threaded Mode
