|
Oyster to Ebbsfleet?
Colin Rosenstiel wrote
The presentation to stakeholders is http://assets.goaheadbus.com/media/c...anchise%20pres entation.pdf. Promises ticket machines at all stations. Are they really justified at Doleham, Three Oaks, or Norman's Bay? Peter |
Oyster to Ebbsfleet?
wrote in message ... In article , () wrote: It's all at http://www.govia.info/gtr/. The presentation to stakeholders is http://assets.goaheadbus.com/media/c...anchise%20pres entation.pdf. -- Colin Rosenstiel |
Oyster to Ebbsfleet?
In message , at 09:58:01
on Mon, 11 Aug 2014, remarked: I have in front of me "Factsheet 2" issued to stakeholders in Cambridge on 15th July. It has "Great Northern", "GTR" and "Govia" brands at the foot and shows the "Great Northern 'Outer' services" including those from 2018 via SPILL to Blackfriars and beyond. It's on the web at http://assets.goaheadbus.com/media/c...t%202%20-%20Gr eat%20Northern%20outer%20services.pdf It's all at http://www.govia.info/gtr/. I'm still wondering if "Great Northern" will be a sub-branding, like GA's "Bittern Line" or EMT's "Robin Hood Line". Elsewhere there are suggestions they'll be keeping Southern and Gatwick Express branding, as well as introducing Thameslink and GA. Are they really going to have four websites, four Android Apps, four delay/repay schemes, smartcard schemes (etc etc). As well as four different names on the PIS and NRES data feeds etc. Although it raises the interesting possibility that the cheaper "Thameslink only" fares competing with "Any permitted" (in effect Southern) fares on the Brighton line will remain. [And booking sites do still offer those fares after the hand-over date] See you at Tim and Kate's on Saturday? Yes. -- Roland Perry |
Oyster to Ebbsfleet?
In message , at 15:22:11 on
Mon, 11 Aug 2014, Paul Corfield remarked: Given each TOC will have their own HOPS and it will need to talk to Tfl's systems and there will need to be data exchange, sharing, revenue settlement etc I can see why there may be complications. Again, I don't know what's so different about revenue settlement at the point of use of a Travelcard (rather than when it's sold). When it's being used all that needs to be done is validate that it's "in Zone". Funny I always thought the Travelcard apportionment was done on a trip basis by mode but I might be wrong. Not a "trips done by that cardholder", though? There are too many places with no gates, or locked out, for it to be able to count on that basis. Again I doubt smartcard data is accepted as a primary data source rather than the long established survey process. I do expect the parties look at Oyster data as an additional source. Long term apportionments based on surveys and other data sources is what I'd expect. So the gates don't need to be precisely logging the individual ITSO travelcards going through, just making sure they are valid. Or are you saying that unbeknown to the passengers they are counting how much the Travelcard is actually (rather than potentially) used on which routes, and divvying up the revenue retrospectively? Of course they are counting journey data. If it wasn't important why do Southern insist that the Key card is touched in and out even when you have a single ticket on the card? Like Oyster (who similarly insist even for Travelcard holders) to get people into the habit, and so the people whose cards *do* need to be touched in and out for validation purposes don't observe lots of other people not touching them in and out. Also, for singles, even if it's just a validator rather than a gate, the touching in/out process will allow long term statistics to be gathered about actual journeys made, rather than what's been bought (including people making longer rather than shorter trips). Quite whether they are cross checking against Travelcards I don't know. I would expect TOCs to look at the data to see how many trips are made with season tickets and how many are normal commutes and how many are leisure journeys. That's just an interesting bit of data any rail company would want to know if it can be reasonably certain about the data quality. Again, that data is useful and by all means gather it. But there are too many "holes" for it to be used to apportion the cost of supplying travel to individual travelcard holders. I expect I'm more likely to be using a TSGN ITSO card (for my travel to London); it'll be interesting to see if those interoperate well with ITSO gates at places like Cambridge which are operated by GA. Well that's for Govia and AGA to sort out. There is no central "guiding hand" which is why you get the nonsense of some mag tickets with special validities not being recognised. I'd expect the DfT would 'guide' them all, in order for SEFT to be a success rather than a balkanised mess. I'm not holding my breath to be able to add a GA (or any other 'foreign') ITSO ticket onto my TSGN card[1], or onto a local Stagecoach bus ITSO card. I think the bus stuff might be a step too far *unless* there is a lot of customer pressure to force Stagecoach and Govia to work together. There is actually a fair bit of overlap along the line of the TSGN franchise so never say never. I'm not suggesting inter-availability of ticketing (well, not yet, although given you can buy a GA rail ticket with Stagecoach Plusbus, that should be some sort of long term goal). No, what I'm looking for is a reduction in card-bloat, so that I can load my bus tickets, and different TOC tickets, separately onto one card. The barriers can work out which single-mode ticket is the one they are looking for when I touch in/out. If that doesn't happen, I'm still not sure onto whose smartcard I'd expect to load a ticket for an EMT train, on a route whose pricing was set by XC, bought from the EC website and collected at a GA station. [Ely-Peterborough on a Norwich-Liverpool train]. Quite likely the first casualty would be my ability to pick and choose the booking site. Ultimately it may turn out (short term hopefully) that only trips between same-TOC stations on tickets bought through that TOC would work (loaded onto that TOC's card - but see below for acceptance on-train when travelling on a different TOC). Unfortunately, for my Ely-Peterborough trip one station is GA, the other EC, neither is XC or EMT, EC doesn't serve the route and GA only serves it 0.5tph. I expect South East Flexible Ticketing will have to sort out inter operator acceptance for valid rail tickets. To not do so would be lunacy. On the trains, of course. When I travel back from Cambridge to Ely it's literally the luck of the draw whether I catch XC, GA or FCC; each of them being 1tph (although not equally spread through the hour). [1] Whatever branding it gets, currently it's Southern "the Key" of course. Have they decided to brand themselves GTR long term, or is that just a working title? All Go Ahead businesses use the "Key" brand name for their transport smartcard so I can't see TSGN being any different. They refer to the Key in their documents related to the franchise changes. I don't doubt they'll keep "the Key", but will there be an ongoing "Southern the Key" and new "Thameslink the Key" and "Great Northern the Key" cards, or will they rename the Southern product as "GTR[1] the Key" and have it valid over all their routes? [1] Or some other as yet unannounced branding like "Govia Capital Connect" [only joking about the actual words there, but things like this do matter, as FCC found out when the PIS at Kings Cross cropped them to "First Capital Con"]. -- Roland Perry |
Oyster to Ebbsfleet?
In article , (Roland Perry)
wrote: In message , at 09:58:01 on Mon, 11 Aug 2014, remarked: I have in front of me "Factsheet 2" issued to stakeholders in Cambridge on 15th July. It has "Great Northern", "GTR" and "Govia" brands at the foot and shows the "Great Northern 'Outer' services" including those from 2018 via SPILL to Blackfriars and beyond. It's on the web at http://assets.goaheadbus.com/media/c...et%202%20-%20G reat%20Northern%20outer%20services.pdf It's all at http://www.govia.info/gtr/. I'm still wondering if "Great Northern" will be a sub-branding, like GA's "Bittern Line" or EMT's "Robin Hood Line". Not the way it is shown on that material. I assume you have looked at it? Elsewhere there are suggestions they'll be keeping Southern and Gatwick Express branding, as well as introducing Thameslink and GA. It's what the Powerpoint says. Are they really going to have four websites, four Android Apps, four delay/repay schemes, smartcard schemes (etc etc). As well as four different names on the PIS and NRES data feeds etc. Does Stansted express do that? Although it raises the interesting possibility that the cheaper "Thameslink only" fares competing with "Any permitted" (in effect Southern) fares on the Brighton line will remain. [And booking sites do still offer those fares after the hand-over date] Intriguing point, especially as Southern have cheap through deals with GA. -- Colin Rosenstiel |
Oyster to Ebbsfleet?
|
Oyster to Ebbsfleet?
In message , at 05:41:49
on Tue, 12 Aug 2014, remarked: I'm still wondering if "Great Northern" will be a sub-branding, like GA's "Bittern Line" or EMT's "Robin Hood Line". Not the way it is shown on that material. I assume you have looked at it? Of course I have, but it doesn't say anything that might dispel my proposition. Elsewhere there are suggestions they'll be keeping Southern and Gatwick Express branding, as well as introducing Thameslink and GA. It's what the Powerpoint says. Just as "Robin Hood Line" is one of EMT's brands. Are they really going to have four websites, four Android Apps, four delay/repay schemes, smartcard schemes (etc etc). As well as four different names on the PIS and NRES data feeds etc. Does Stansted express do that? No, but those trains are shown as GA on the customer-facing databases. eg RTT just now: 1215 Stansted Airport to London Liverpool Street Greater Anglia service as opposed to: 1220 Gatwick Airport to London Victoria Gatwick Express service Stansted Express has its own website though, but somewhat spoils the consistent image by asking for delay compensation claims to be sent to . and in the footer says: "Stansted Express is operated by Abellio Greater Anglia Ltd" Gatwick Express has its own dedicated Delay-Repay form [albeit including text like "For all ticket holders please give details of your delayed journey with Southern that you are claiming against" and giving a Southern Rail address to send it to!] but shares a dual-branded passenger charter with Southern. All a bit of a muddle, really. And what we want to know is how will all of this map across to trips to Cambridge. Although it raises the interesting possibility that the cheaper "Thameslink only" fares competing with "Any permitted" (in effect Southern) fares on the Brighton line will remain. [And booking sites do still offer those fares after the hand-over date] Intriguing point, especially as Southern have cheap through deals with GA. Those too. -- Roland Perry |
Oyster to Ebbsfleet?
|
Oyster to Ebbsfleet?
In article , (Roland Perry)
wrote: In message , at 05:41:50 on Tue, 12 Aug 2014, remarked: [1] Or some other as yet unannounced branding like "Govia Capital Connect" [only joking about the actual words there, but things like this do matter, as FCC found out when the PIS at Kings Cross cropped them to "First Capital Con"]. Leading me to wonder what the new franchise will have on the PIS from September. Oh do keep up... that's what I've been wondering for days - and whether it's the same thing for all their Non-Gatex routes, or three different things. We've even been speculating about whether from 2018 trains from Cambridge will be on the PIS as "Greater Northern" and "Thameslink" depending on where they end up south of Finsbury Park. As I said the Great Northern factsheet shows their trains continuing to Blackfriars from 2018. -- Colin Rosenstiel |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 11:48 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk