![]() |
Borisbuses
In message , at 16:29:58 on Sat, 28
Feb 2015, Neil Williams remarked: Wow. I don't think you've mentioned that. That's a scandalous flaw. In the bus, not in you! I would be interested in what the precise cause of that is. I have a similar thing with trains - the awful suspension and failure to bolt the seats to the wall on the Class 180s means I can barely stand a journey in one. While I as a person can cope with the 180's sideways oscillations, it makes it impossible to type on a keyboard whose keys are shifting left and right faster than one could ever correct for it. -- Roland Perry |
Borisbuses
On 2015\02\28 16:29, Neil Williams wrote:
On 2015-02-28 12:53:55 +0000, Basil Jet said: Wow. I don't think you've mentioned that. That's a scandalous flaw. In the bus, not in you! I would be interested in what the precise cause of that is. I have a similar thing with trains - the awful suspension and failure to bolt the seats to the wall on the Class 180s means I can barely stand a journey in one. ?? I now have this mental picture of a train with a load of swivel chairs sliding around on every curve. Wildly swinging chandeliers would complete the image. And some very annoyed people in waistcoats with twirly moustaches, playing snooker and shouting "Great Scott!" |
Borisbuses
On Saturday, 28 February 2015 18:06:05 UTC, Basil Jet wrote:
On 2015\02\28 16:29, Neil Williams wrote: On 2015-02-28 12:53:55 +0000, Basil Jet said: Wow. I don't think you've mentioned that. That's a scandalous flaw. In the bus, not in you! I would be interested in what the precise cause of that is. I have a similar thing with trains - the awful suspension and failure to bolt the seats to the wall on the Class 180s means I can barely stand a journey in one. ?? I now have this mental picture of a train with a load of swivel chairs sliding around on every curve. Wildly swinging chandeliers would complete the image. And some very annoyed people in waistcoats with twirly moustaches, playing snooker and shouting "Great Scott!" .....LOL! And one man trying to keep a pencil upright on a saucer. |
Borisbuses
Basil Jet wrote:
On 2015\02\28 16:29, Neil Williams wrote: On 2015-02-28 12:53:55 +0000, Basil Jet said: Wow. I don't think you've mentioned that. That's a scandalous flaw. In the bus, not in you! I would be interested in what the precise cause of that is. I have a similar thing with trains - the awful suspension and failure to bolt the seats to the wall on the Class 180s means I can barely stand a journey in one. ?? I now have this mental picture of a train with a load of swivel chairs sliding around on every curve. Wildly swinging chandeliers would complete the image. And some very annoyed people in waistcoats with twirly moustaches, playing snooker and shouting "Great Scott!" I must say, that was one of the nice things about the Caledonian Sleeper when I travelled on it (which was, as I mentioned before, about 15 years ago) - the bar car had proper tables and chairs you could move. It was quite a novelty! It also had ashtrays - ahh, those were the glory days... Romanian sleepers don't have the movable furniture in the dining car, but joy of joys you can get an ashtray (or more accurately, ash saucer) if you ask nicely :-). |
Borisbuses
On 2015-02-28 18:06:04 +0000, Basil Jet said:
?? Most trains have a pair of seats supported by being bolted to a track on the sidewall and having only one "leg" on the other side, bolted to the floor. The Class 175 and 180 have two vertical "legs" bolted to the floor, not the sidewall. As the frame isn't rigid enough, this means they sway side to side. Neil -- Neil Williams Put my first name before the @ to reply. |
Borisbuses
On 2015\02\28 20:56, Neil Williams wrote:
On 2015-02-28 18:06:04 +0000, Basil Jet said: ?? Most trains have a pair of seats supported by being bolted to a track on the sidewall and having only one "leg" on the other side, bolted to the floor. The Class 175 and 180 have two vertical "legs" bolted to the floor, not the sidewall. As the frame isn't rigid enough, this means they sway side to side. Hopefully there's no room for fingers between the seat and the wall! |
Borisbuses
|
Borisbuses
On 2015-02-28 21:34:50 +0000, Basil Jet said:
Hopefully there's no room for fingers between the seat and the wall! Never even thought of that, but it's yet another reason why it's an idiotic design... Neil -- Neil Williams Put my first name before the @ to reply. |
Borisbuses
On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 07:19:32PM +0000, Clank wrote:
I must say, that was one of the nice things about the Caledonian Sleeper when I travelled on it (which was, as I mentioned before, about 15 years ago) - the bar car had proper tables and chairs you could move. It was quite a novelty! It still does! -- David Cantrell | top google result for "internet beard fetish club" Blessed are the pessimists, for they test their backups |
Borisbuses
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:47 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk