London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old July 12th 15, 09:14 AM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jun 2005
Posts: 53
Default Removing "the plough" from a London tram

On 11/07/2015 19:53, Clive D. W. Feather wrote:
In message , Peter Beale
wrote:
Are you sure it was Lewisham High Street? I lived in Lewisham (Loampit
Hill) all through the war, and I am sure that the Grove Park bound
trams (52 & 54, also 58 to Victoria via Dulwich) did not change over
until further south, certainly beyond the Town Hall where the 66 & 74
from Southend Lane joined them. The Beresford Square bound trams (46 &
72) changed at Lee Green on Lee High Road.


I've just checked a 1932 tramway track plan. Starting at the river and
going clockwise, the change pits we
[36, 38, 40] Woolwich High Street immediately east of the ferry
[46, 72] Eltham Road immediately east of Burnt Ash Road
[52, 54, 74] Downham Way immediately east of Bromley Road


Thanks, Clive. I thought it was in Downham Way that they changed. They
only had a very short stretch under the wires before reaching the Grove
Park Station terminus. The 46 and 72 did indeed change at Lee Green, but
my memory (it was a long time ago) had them on the Lewisham side of
Burnt Ash Road rather than the Eltham side.

I was also wrong about the 66, which went from Forest Hill via Brockley
and did not get to Lewisham. I meant the 62 (Blackwall Tunnel to Savoy
St Strand, weekdays only - I always used to wonder who 'St Strand' was).

Peter Beale

  #2   Report Post  
Old July 13th 15, 08:15 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Mar 2009
Posts: 240
Default Removing "the plough" from a London tram

In message , Peter Beale
wrote:
I've just checked a 1932 tramway track plan. Starting at the river and
going clockwise, the change pits we
[36, 38, 40] Woolwich High Street immediately east of the ferry
[46, 72] Eltham Road immediately east of Burnt Ash Road
[52, 54, 74] Downham Way immediately east of Bromley Road


Thanks, Clive. I thought it was in Downham Way that they changed. They
only had a very short stretch under the wires before reaching the Grove
Park Station terminus.


Hmm, so they did.

The 46 and 72 did indeed change at Lee Green, but my memory (it was a
long time ago) had them on the Lewisham side of Burnt Ash Road rather
than the Eltham side.


I've just noticed a note that says the overhead continued west to just
beyond the crossover on the Lewisham side of Burnt Ash Road. That could
be why you thought that.

The other interesting note is that until 1927 the 44, 46, and 72 ran
under trolleybus wiring between Woolwich and the Eltham Road change pit
(or Eltham Church for the 44) to prevent interference with the RGO.

--
Clive D.W. Feather | Home:
Mobile: +44 7973 377646 | Web: http://www.davros.org
Please reply to the Reply-To address, which is:
  #3   Report Post  
Old July 14th 15, 09:55 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jun 2005
Posts: 53
Default Removing "the plough" from a London tram

On 13/07/2015 21:15, Clive D. W. Feather wrote:
In message , Peter Beale
wrote:
I've just checked a 1932 tramway track plan. Starting at the river and
going clockwise, the change pits we
[36, 38, 40] Woolwich High Street immediately east of the ferry
[46, 72] Eltham Road immediately east of Burnt Ash Road
[52, 54, 74] Downham Way immediately east of Bromley Road


Thanks, Clive. I thought it was in Downham Way that they changed. They
only had a very short stretch under the wires before reaching the
Grove Park Station terminus.


Hmm, so they did.

The 46 and 72 did indeed change at Lee Green, but my memory (it was a
long time ago) had them on the Lewisham side of Burnt Ash Road rather
than the Eltham side.


I've just noticed a note that says the overhead continued west to just
beyond the crossover on the Lewisham side of Burnt Ash Road. That could
be why you thought that.


I don't think I can make that excuse - it was certainly the change pit
itself that I had in mind. Probably there was a tram stop on the
Lewisham side, so the conductor had a good opportunity to put the pole
up, then the tram could continue without stopping over the change pit.

The other interesting note is that until 1927 the 44, 46, and 72 ran
under trolleybus wiring between Woolwich and the Eltham Road change pit
(or Eltham Church for the 44) to prevent interference with the RGO.

That is interesting - do you mean they had twin wires like trolleybuses
- did they use both trolley poles? Pardon my ignorance, but what is RGO?
There were of course no trolleybuses between Woolwich and Eltham or Lee
Green, the 696 and 698 went from Woolwich Free Ferry towards Plumstead
and Erith.

Peter Beale
  #4   Report Post  
Old July 14th 15, 11:29 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,877
Default Removing "the plough" from a London tram

In article , (Peter
Beale) wrote:

On 13/07/2015 21:15, Clive D. W. Feather wrote:
In message , Peter Beale
wrote:
I've just checked a 1932 tramway track plan. Starting at the river and
going clockwise, the change pits we
[36, 38, 40] Woolwich High Street immediately east of the ferry
[46, 72] Eltham Road immediately east of Burnt Ash Road
[52, 54, 74] Downham Way immediately east of Bromley Road

Thanks, Clive. I thought it was in Downham Way that they changed. They
only had a very short stretch under the wires before reaching the
Grove Park Station terminus.


Hmm, so they did.

The 46 and 72 did indeed change at Lee Green, but my memory (it was a
long time ago) had them on the Lewisham side of Burnt Ash Road rather
than the Eltham side.


I've just noticed a note that says the overhead continued west to just
beyond the crossover on the Lewisham side of Burnt Ash Road. That could
be why you thought that.


I don't think I can make that excuse - it was certainly the change
pit itself that I had in mind. Probably there was a tram stop on the
Lewisham side, so the conductor had a good opportunity to put the
pole up, then the tram could continue without stopping over the
change pit.

The other interesting note is that until 1927 the 44, 46, and 72 ran
under trolleybus wiring between Woolwich and the Eltham Road change pit
(or Eltham Church for the 44) to prevent interference with the RGO.

That is interesting - do you mean they had twin wires like
trolleybuses - did they use both trolley poles? Pardon my ignorance,
but what is RGO? There were of course no trolleybuses between
Woolwich and Eltham or Lee Green, the 696 and 698 went from Woolwich
Free Ferry towards Plumstead and Erith.


Trams used both their trolley poles on that section with no return through
the rails. They were only a bit like trolleybuses because they used skates
not trolley wheels.

The RGO is the Royal Greenwich Observatory which moved to Sussex in 1927.

--
Colin Rosenstiel
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cross River Tram "top of Boris's list" Patrick Osborne London Transport 11 June 16th 09 03:01 AM
Tram equivalent of "Ian's Bus Stop" Troy Steadman London Transport 0 December 22nd 04 04:18 PM
removing staff? What happens to security? CharlesPottins London Transport 12 July 3rd 04 10:16 AM
HSE - "grossly inefficient" and "dysfunctional" John Rowland London Transport 0 November 28th 03 07:57 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:36 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 London Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about London Transport"

 

Copyright © 2017