Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Peter Beale
wrote: I've just checked a 1932 tramway track plan. Starting at the river and going clockwise, the change pits we [36, 38, 40] Woolwich High Street immediately east of the ferry [46, 72] Eltham Road immediately east of Burnt Ash Road [52, 54, 74] Downham Way immediately east of Bromley Road Thanks, Clive. I thought it was in Downham Way that they changed. They only had a very short stretch under the wires before reaching the Grove Park Station terminus. Hmm, so they did. The 46 and 72 did indeed change at Lee Green, but my memory (it was a long time ago) had them on the Lewisham side of Burnt Ash Road rather than the Eltham side. I've just noticed a note that says the overhead continued west to just beyond the crossover on the Lewisham side of Burnt Ash Road. That could be why you thought that. The other interesting note is that until 1927 the 44, 46, and 72 ran under trolleybus wiring between Woolwich and the Eltham Road change pit (or Eltham Church for the 44) to prevent interference with the RGO. -- Clive D.W. Feather | Home: Mobile: +44 7973 377646 | Web: http://www.davros.org Please reply to the Reply-To address, which is: |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 13/07/2015 21:15, Clive D. W. Feather wrote:
In message , Peter Beale wrote: I've just checked a 1932 tramway track plan. Starting at the river and going clockwise, the change pits we [36, 38, 40] Woolwich High Street immediately east of the ferry [46, 72] Eltham Road immediately east of Burnt Ash Road [52, 54, 74] Downham Way immediately east of Bromley Road Thanks, Clive. I thought it was in Downham Way that they changed. They only had a very short stretch under the wires before reaching the Grove Park Station terminus. Hmm, so they did. The 46 and 72 did indeed change at Lee Green, but my memory (it was a long time ago) had them on the Lewisham side of Burnt Ash Road rather than the Eltham side. I've just noticed a note that says the overhead continued west to just beyond the crossover on the Lewisham side of Burnt Ash Road. That could be why you thought that. I don't think I can make that excuse - it was certainly the change pit itself that I had in mind. Probably there was a tram stop on the Lewisham side, so the conductor had a good opportunity to put the pole up, then the tram could continue without stopping over the change pit. The other interesting note is that until 1927 the 44, 46, and 72 ran under trolleybus wiring between Woolwich and the Eltham Road change pit (or Eltham Church for the 44) to prevent interference with the RGO. That is interesting - do you mean they had twin wires like trolleybuses - did they use both trolley poles? Pardon my ignorance, but what is RGO? There were of course no trolleybuses between Woolwich and Eltham or Lee Green, the 696 and 698 went from Woolwich Free Ferry towards Plumstead and Erith. Peter Beale |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Cross River Tram "top of Boris's list" | London Transport | |||
Tram equivalent of "Ian's Bus Stop" | London Transport | |||
removing staff? What happens to security? | London Transport | |||
HSE - "grossly inefficient" and "dysfunctional" | London Transport |