Paul Corfield wrote:

On Mon, 9 Nov 2015 07:26:16 -0000 (UTC), Recliner
wrote:


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukne...challenge.html

That would be the Mr Chambers who has insulted various senior people
at TfL via social media, who has made outrageous statements about the
boss of the LT Museum, whose companies have repeatedly failed and / or
not posted annual accounts. He has also breached TfL and LU copyright
by using the London Underground name without approval. He has
barracked the Mayor of London umpteen times without any success. Boris
is too polite to tell him to "go away" (gross insulting alternative
versions are probably more appropriate).

He's a deluded fantasist. I don't imagine for one second TfL are
remotely concerned about being dragged into court. They are probably
relishing the prospect to demonstrate the lack of case he has. I also
doubt the London Assembly will be unduly bothered. They'll undoubtedly
be given a private briefing by TfL as to what has gone on in terms of
the procurement process plus all the previous attempts by Mr Chambers
to "market" stations that he does not own, he has no lease for or has
any authority over. His whole approach has been deeply flawed for
many years - he seems to believe he has an inalienable right to
exploit these disused stations but he simply does not.

He appears to be simultaneously claiming that TfL are both unfairly
discriminating against him and giving him an unfair advantage?

Peter Smyth