Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2015\11\15 16:18, Basil Jet wrote:
On 2015\11\15 16:01, Recliner wrote: Basil Jet wrote: I wonder if the counterweight balances a half-laden cabin, or an averagely-laden cabin (which would presumably be much lighter). This was what the original feasibility study proposed: - Payload: 1000kg - Cabin weight: 1400kg - Counterweight: 1900kg So the counterweight in the actual lift (which has a smaller payload than the proposed version) most probably balances a half-laden cabin. That way, you minimise the required motor torque. ... but not the total energy consumption, which would be minimised if the counterweight matched the cabin plus one teenager, since the payload will typically alternate between empty and 1 woman + 1 child + 1 pushchair. Sorry, forgot to say "thanks" for answering my question. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Wooden Bus Shelters | London Transport | |||
Wooden Bus Shelters | London Transport | |||
Wooden Bus Shelters | London Transport | |||
On the subject of inclined platforms... | London Transport | |||
Dot Matrix replaces big boards at L/Pool St | London Transport |