Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 09:58:33 on Tue, 16 Aug
2016, tim... remarked: And when Uber drivers arrive for a pick up at someone's house, surely they announce themselves in the same was as any mini cab would? Or do they just sit outside and "hope"? My experience of (pre-Uber) minicab drivers is they just sit outside in the road tooting the horn until someone emerges from the house. Yet another completely illegal procedure, of course. The only ones who actually come to the door are airline courtesy "limos" for business class flights (and I've not had one of those for years). -- Roland Perry |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Roland Perry" wrote in message ... In message , at 09:58:33 on Tue, 16 Aug 2016, tim... remarked: And when Uber drivers arrive for a pick up at someone's house, surely they announce themselves in the same was as any mini cab would? Or do they just sit outside and "hope"? My experience of (pre-Uber) minicab drivers is they just sit outside in the road tooting the horn until someone emerges from the house. Yet another completely illegal procedure, of course. I was aware of that Recliner was talking as if they didn't even do that tim |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
tim... wrote:
"Roland Perry" wrote in message ... In message , at 09:58:33 on Tue, 16 Aug 2016, tim... remarked: And when Uber drivers arrive for a pick up at someone's house, surely they announce themselves in the same was as any mini cab would? Or do they just sit outside and "hope"? My experience of (pre-Uber) minicab drivers is they just sit outside in the road tooting the horn until someone emerges from the house. Yet another completely illegal procedure, of course. I was aware of that Recliner was talking as if they didn't even do that Uber is more likely to be used by people who are out and about. Once a driver has been assigned, Uber sends the client a description of the car, and it's up to the customer to identify it and get in. Someone getting a mini cab from home is more likely to phone their local firm, which will be cheaper and more likely to have a car available locally. They will also accept pre-bookings, which Uber does not. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Recliner" wrote in message ... tim... wrote: "Roland Perry" wrote in message ... In message , at 09:58:33 on Tue, 16 Aug 2016, tim... remarked: And when Uber drivers arrive for a pick up at someone's house, surely they announce themselves in the same was as any mini cab would? Or do they just sit outside and "hope"? My experience of (pre-Uber) minicab drivers is they just sit outside in the road tooting the horn until someone emerges from the house. Yet another completely illegal procedure, of course. I was aware of that Recliner was talking as if they didn't even do that Uber is more likely to be used by people who are out and about. I don't use it but I thought the MO of Uber was to be able to hail a mini-cab at an agreed price, with all of the billing taken care of "automatically" I can't see any reason why your normal mini-cab user wouldn't use it, none at all Once a driver has been assigned, Uber sends the client a description of the car, and it's up to the customer to identify it and get in. Someone getting a mini cab from home is more likely to phone their local firm, why, they have all the aggro of paying in cash which will be cheaper will it. I thought that Uber was cheaper (or at least the same price) as mini-cabs and more likely to have a car available locally. why? They will also accept pre-bookings, which Uber does not. which is completely irrelevant if you want a car now tim |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 17 Aug 2016 12:35:19 +0100, "tim..."
wrote: "Recliner" wrote in message ... tim... wrote: "Roland Perry" wrote in message ... In message , at 09:58:33 on Tue, 16 Aug 2016, tim... remarked: And when Uber drivers arrive for a pick up at someone's house, surely they announce themselves in the same was as any mini cab would? Or do they just sit outside and "hope"? My experience of (pre-Uber) minicab drivers is they just sit outside in the road tooting the horn until someone emerges from the house. Yet another completely illegal procedure, of course. I was aware of that Recliner was talking as if they didn't even do that Uber is more likely to be used by people who are out and about. I don't use it Rather obviously, as you seem to have an irrational hatred for it, without any knowledge of what it is or how it works. but I thought the MO of Uber was to be able to hail a mini-cab at an agreed price, with all of the billing taken care of "automatically" I can't see any reason why your normal mini-cab user wouldn't use it, none at all That's because you know nothing of Uber, then. One obvious reason: it's more expensive, especially at 'surge' times. - Second reason: it's less likely to have cars available locally in residential areas (just like black cabs). - Third reason: you have to have a smart phone, with a signal/wi-fi access (which is why very few blind people will have an Uber account). - Fourth reason: you have to have an Uber account before you can use it, and Uber's app installed on your smart phone. Enough? Once a driver has been assigned, Uber sends the client a description of the car, and it's up to the customer to identify it and get in. Someone getting a mini cab from home is more likely to phone their local firm, why, they have all the aggro of paying in cash Not necessarily. You can set up an account with other mini cab firms, and frequent users often do. Or you can often pay with a card. With Uber, you have to have an account, before you can use it at all. Cash isn't an option, and nor can you just order an Uber car without first setting up an account. which will be cheaper will it. I thought that Uber was cheaper (or at least the same price) as mini-cabs No, you're wrong again. Do you really know nothing at all about Uber? It's usually cheaper than black cabs, but more expensive than mini cabs. Uber is really competing with black cabs, not other mini cabs. That's why most of the anecdotal reports attacking Uber comes from grumpy cabbies who see it as unfair competition that undercuts them. and more likely to have a car available locally. why? Just like black cabs, Uber drivers hang around busy places, with lots of potential customers, not residential areas. Local mini cab firms are far more likely to have drivers available close by. They will also accept pre-bookings, which Uber does not. which is completely irrelevant if you want a car now Sure, but many (most?) mini cabs are pre-booked. As I said, Uber competes more with black cabs. I'm curious why you have this deep hatred for something you've never used, and know nothing about? |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Recliner" wrote in message ... On Wed, 17 Aug 2016 12:35:19 +0100, "tim..." wrote: "Recliner" wrote in message ... tim... wrote: "Roland Perry" wrote in message ... In message , at 09:58:33 on Tue, 16 Aug 2016, tim... remarked: And when Uber drivers arrive for a pick up at someone's house, surely they announce themselves in the same was as any mini cab would? Or do they just sit outside and "hope"? My experience of (pre-Uber) minicab drivers is they just sit outside in the road tooting the horn until someone emerges from the house. Yet another completely illegal procedure, of course. I was aware of that Recliner was talking as if they didn't even do that Uber is more likely to be used by people who are out and about. I don't use it Rather obviously, I don't use it, as never have the need for a taxi as you seem to have an irrational hatred for it, without any knowledge of what it is or how it works. I don't like it because it has a business model based upon making extra "profit, by ignoring or circumventing regulations. I have a hatred for all companies that do this, and that includes any company that tries to get around giving their employees rights by bogus SE contracts - though I accept that Uber drives are almost certainly SE workers, it is elsewhere that Uber are lazy about compliance. as such it isn't irrational. but I thought the MO of Uber was to be able to hail a mini-cab at an agreed price, with all of the billing taken care of "automatically" I can't see any reason why your normal mini-cab user wouldn't use it, none at all That's because you know nothing of Uber, then. One obvious reason: it's more expensive, especially at 'surge' times. - Second reason: it's less likely to have cars available locally in residential areas (just like black cabs). - Third reason: you have to have a smart phone, with a signal/wi-fi access (which is why very few blind people will have an Uber account). - Fourth reason: you have to have an Uber account before you can use it, and Uber's app installed on your smart phone. Enough? Once a driver has been assigned, Uber sends the client a description of the car, and it's up to the customer to identify it and get in. Someone getting a mini cab from home is more likely to phone their local firm, why, they have all the aggro of paying in cash Not necessarily. You can set up an account with other mini cab firms, and frequent users often do. Or you can often pay with a card. With Uber, you have to have an account, before you can use it at all. Cash isn't an option, and nor can you just order an Uber car without first setting up an account. You might just as well argue that there's a deterrent to using the Dartford crossing as you (almost) can't pay for that without setting up an account (you can stop in a some garages somewhere to pay, but that's got to be even more aggro) which will be cheaper will it. I thought that Uber was cheaper (or at least the same price) as mini-cabs No, you're wrong again. Do you really know nothing at all about Uber? As a user, no. Though what I do see is complaints from drivers about how little they end up with in their pocket (before tax). I had naturally concluded that that was because there fares were lower. It's usually cheaper than black cabs, but more expensive than mini cabs. Uber is really competing with black cabs, not other mini cabs. That's why most of the anecdotal reports attacking Uber comes from grumpy cabbies who see it as unfair competition that undercuts them. and more likely to have a car available locally. why? Just like black cabs, Uber drivers hang around busy places, with lots of potential customers, not residential areas. Local mini cab firms are far more likely to have drivers available close by. They will also accept pre-bookings, which Uber does not. which is completely irrelevant if you want a car now Sure, but many (most?) mini cabs are pre-booked. only in the "10 minutes before" sense As I said, Uber competes more with black cabs. I'm curious why you have this deep hatred for something you've never used, and know nothing about? because it's a bottom feeding cherry picking predator. And this isn't based upon just my vision of its UK operation. I am following its "abuses" in other countries as well tim |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
tim... wrote:
"Recliner" wrote in message ... On Wed, 17 Aug 2016 12:35:19 +0100, "tim..." wrote: "Recliner" wrote in message ... tim... wrote: "Roland Perry" wrote in message ... In message , at 09:58:33 on Tue, 16 Aug 2016, tim... remarked: And when Uber drivers arrive for a pick up at someone's house, surely they announce themselves in the same was as any mini cab would? Or do they just sit outside and "hope"? My experience of (pre-Uber) minicab drivers is they just sit outside in the road tooting the horn until someone emerges from the house. Yet another completely illegal procedure, of course. I was aware of that Recliner was talking as if they didn't even do that Uber is more likely to be used by people who are out and about. I don't use it Rather obviously, I don't use it, as never have the need for a taxi as you seem to have an irrational hatred for it, without any knowledge of what it is or how it works. I don't like it because it has a business model based upon making extra "profit, by ignoring or circumventing regulations. I have a hatred for all companies that do this, and that includes any company that tries to get around giving their employees rights by bogus SE contracts - though I accept that Uber drives are almost certainly SE workers, it is elsewhere that Uber are lazy about compliance. as such it isn't irrational. but I thought the MO of Uber was to be able to hail a mini-cab at an agreed price, with all of the billing taken care of "automatically" I can't see any reason why your normal mini-cab user wouldn't use it, none at all That's because you know nothing of Uber, then. One obvious reason: it's more expensive, especially at 'surge' times. - Second reason: it's less likely to have cars available locally in residential areas (just like black cabs). - Third reason: you have to have a smart phone, with a signal/wi-fi access (which is why very few blind people will have an Uber account). - Fourth reason: you have to have an Uber account before you can use it, and Uber's app installed on your smart phone. Enough? Once a driver has been assigned, Uber sends the client a description of the car, and it's up to the customer to identify it and get in. Someone getting a mini cab from home is more likely to phone their local firm, why, they have all the aggro of paying in cash Not necessarily. You can set up an account with other mini cab firms, and frequent users often do. Or you can often pay with a card. With Uber, you have to have an account, before you can use it at all. Cash isn't an option, and nor can you just order an Uber car without first setting up an account. You might just as well argue that there's a deterrent to using the Dartford crossing as you (almost) can't pay for that without setting up an account (you can stop in a some garages somewhere to pay, but that's got to be even more aggro) which will be cheaper will it. I thought that Uber was cheaper (or at least the same price) as mini-cabs No, you're wrong again. Do you really know nothing at all about Uber? As a user, no. You know nothing about Uber in any context, but still make all sorts of barmy allegations about it. Though what I do see is complaints from drivers about how little they end up with in their pocket (before tax). I had naturally concluded that that was because there fares were lower. It's usually cheaper than black cabs, but more expensive than mini cabs. Uber is really competing with black cabs, not other mini cabs. That's why most of the anecdotal reports attacking Uber comes from grumpy cabbies who see it as unfair competition that undercuts them. and more likely to have a car available locally. why? Just like black cabs, Uber drivers hang around busy places, with lots of potential customers, not residential areas. Local mini cab firms are far more likely to have drivers available close by. They will also accept pre-bookings, which Uber does not. which is completely irrelevant if you want a car now Sure, but many (most?) mini cabs are pre-booked. only in the "10 minutes before" sense Not for the many people using them to go to the airport, station, hospital appointment, etc. People who might otherwise drive or use public transport (like me) uses a mini cab for such purposes. As I said, Uber competes more with black cabs. I'm curious why you have this deep hatred for something you've never used, and know nothing about? because it's a bottom feeding cherry picking predator. No it's. As I said, you seem to have an irrational hatred of somethig you know nothing about. It's using technology to provide a new, and for many customers, a better way of doing something. The people who dislike it most are its competitors who still do things the old, inefficient way. And this isn't based upon just my vision of its UK operation. I am following its "abuses" in other countries as well If there is a valid criticism of Uber, it's that it treats its drivers as employees, but pays them as if they're self-employed. So it doesn't provide employee benefits, but expects them to follow the sort of rules that employees. That's a particular issue in the US. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 15:05:49 on Wed, 17 Aug
2016, tim... remarked: With Uber, you have to have an account, before you can use it at all. Cash isn't an option, and nor can you just order an Uber car without first setting up an account. You might just as well argue that there's a deterrent to using the Dartford crossing as you (almost) can't pay for that without setting up an account If I can chip in here, yes that is deterrent. I've avoided it ever since. On the other hand I used the M6 toll for the first time a couple of months ago, and all you have to do is lean out of the car and use any old contactless credit card. -- Roland Perry |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 01:26:03PM +0100, Recliner wrote:
One obvious reason: it's more expensive IME Uber is cheaper than a local minicab company by around 25%. especially at 'surge' times. OK, I'll grant you that. They're rare though. - Second reason: it's less likely to have cars available locally in residential areas (just like black cabs). Wrong. There are four, right now, within 500 yards of my flat. - Third reason: you have to have a smart phone, with a signal/wi-fi access (which is why very few blind people will have an Uber account). The blind people I know actually find a smart phone more useful than a dumb phone. - Fourth reason: you have to have an Uber account before you can use it, and Uber's app installed on your smart phone. Well duh. And how long does it take to install and set up? Not very long at all. It certainly takes less time than it does to find a local minicab office if you don't know the area. You only have to do it once though. I did it while waiting ages for a normal minicab to become available at a cab office in Balham. -- David Cantrell | http://www.cantrell.org.uk/david The test of the goodness of a thing is its fitness for use. If it fails on this first test, no amount of ornamentation or finish will make it any better, it will only make it more expensive and foolish. -- Frank Pick, lecture to the Design and Industries Assoc, 1916 |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 24 Aug 2016 13:55:08 +0100
David Cantrell wrote: - Third reason: you have to have a smart phone, with a signal/wi-fi access (which is why very few blind people will have an Uber account). The blind people I know actually find a smart phone more useful than a dumb phone. Oh really? And how exactly do they operate a touchscreen, press it randomly and hope for the best? - Fourth reason: you have to have an Uber account before you can use it, and Uber's app installed on your smart phone. Well duh. And how long does it take to install and set up? Not very long at all. It certainly takes less time than it does to find a local minicab office if you don't know the area. The question is - why are you supporting this silicon valley shark instead of local businesses? Do you have any sort of conscience? -- Spud |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Bob Crow is a Complete and Utter B*ST*RD! | London Transport | |||
Bob Crow Gets His Claim in 7 Years Early | London Transport | |||
Kiley going | London Transport | |||
Bob Crow | London Transport | |||
Kiley wants road user charging in London | London Transport |