On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 12:32:45 +0000
(Mark Bestley) wrote:
Roland Perry wrote:

In message , at 10:28:50 on Wed, 16 Nov
2016, d remarked:
Pity May didn't trigger it while she had the chance before those
immigrants won that legal challenge (one can only hope one night down
a dark alley...).

Racist and fascist.

Racist? Against which race exactly? Be specific.

A racism charge doesn't have to specify a specific race.

As for fascist I can't think of anything more pro-authoritarian than some
people who weren't even born here who seem to think they have to the right
to
question the implementation of the result of a referendum of the natives.

Gosh, you are confused. Many of the people with a vote in this country
weren't born here (if that's what you mean by 'native').

And many people who were born here did not have a vote e.g. those using
EU freedom of movement to work in Europe.

There's a reason there's an "ex" in ex-pat.

--
Spud

wrote in message news
On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 10:43:33 +0000
Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 10:28:50 on Wed, 16 Nov
2016, d remarked:
Pity May didn't trigger it while she had the chance before those
immigrants
won that legal challenge (one can only hope one night down a dark
alley...).

Racist and fascist.

Racist? Against which race exactly? Be specific.

A racism charge doesn't have to specify a specific race.

Not for a delusional **** spewing liberal no, but for any rational
thinking
person, yes, it does otherwise the term is meaningless other than a
playground
insult designed to shut down debate.

As for fascist I can't think of anything more pro-authoritarian than some
people who weren't even born here who seem to think they have to the
right to
question the implementation of the result of a referendum of the natives.

Gosh, you are confused. Many of the people with a vote in this country
weren't born here (if that's what you mean by 'native').

And I doubt many of them voted leave not that I give a **** about their
opinions in this context anyway.


apparently, a large number of the 50s generation of immigrates voted to
reduce the current lot of immigrants

On 16/11/2016 14:15, tim... wrote:

wrote in message news
On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 10:43:33 +0000
Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 10:28:50 on Wed, 16 Nov
2016, d remarked:
Pity May didn't trigger it while she had the chance before those
immigrants
won that legal challenge (one can only hope one night down a dark
alley...).

Racist and fascist.

Racist? Against which race exactly? Be specific.

A racism charge doesn't have to specify a specific race.

Not for a delusional **** spewing liberal no, but for any rational
thinking
person, yes, it does otherwise the term is meaningless other than a
playground
insult designed to shut down debate.

As for fascist I can't think of anything more pro-authoritarian than
some
people who weren't even born here who seem to think they have to the
right to
question the implementation of the result of a referendum of the
natives.

Gosh, you are confused. Many of the people with a vote in this country
weren't born here (if that's what you mean by 'native').

And I doubt many of them voted leave not that I give a **** about their
opinions in this context anyway.


apparently, a large number of the 50s generation of immigrates voted to
reduce the current lot of immigrants


A chap I spoke to from Hong Kng voted leave "because it would reduce
illegal immigration if we left".

--
Graeme Wall
This account not read.

"tim..." wrote in message
news

wrote in message news
On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 10:43:33 +0000
Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 10:28:50 on Wed, 16 Nov
2016, d remarked:
Pity May didn't trigger it while she had the chance before those
immigrants
won that legal challenge (one can only hope one night down a dark
alley...).

Racist and fascist.

Racist? Against which race exactly? Be specific.

A racism charge doesn't have to specify a specific race.

Not for a delusional **** spewing liberal no, but for any rational
thinking
person, yes, it does otherwise the term is meaningless other than a
playground
insult designed to shut down debate.

As for fascist I can't think of anything more pro-authoritarian than
some
people who weren't even born here who seem to think they have to the
right to
question the implementation of the result of a referendum of the
natives.

Gosh, you are confused. Many of the people with a vote in this country
weren't born here (if that's what you mean by 'native').

And I doubt many of them voted leave not that I give a **** about their
opinions in this context anyway.


apparently, a large number of the 50s generation of immigrates voted to

Hm, what on earth is an immigrate?

Oops

tim

On 16/11/16 14:38, tim... wrote:

"tim..." wrote in message
news

wrote in message news
On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 10:43:33 +0000
Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 10:28:50 on Wed, 16 Nov
2016, d remarked:
Pity May didn't trigger it while she had the chance before those
immigrants
won that legal challenge (one can only hope one night down a dark
alley...).

Racist and fascist.

Racist? Against which race exactly? Be specific.

A racism charge doesn't have to specify a specific race.

Not for a delusional **** spewing liberal no, but for any rational
thinking
person, yes, it does otherwise the term is meaningless other than a
playground
insult designed to shut down debate.

As for fascist I can't think of anything more pro-authoritarian
than some
people who weren't even born here who seem to think they have to
the right to
question the implementation of the result of a referendum of the
natives.

Gosh, you are confused. Many of the people with a vote in this country
weren't born here (if that's what you mean by 'native').

And I doubt many of them voted leave not that I give a **** about their
opinions in this context anyway.


apparently, a large number of the 50s generation of immigrates voted to

Hm, what on earth is an immigrate?

Oops

tim

Google should be your friend.
https://www.google.com/search?as_q=i...pe=&as_rights=
Why couldn't you be bothered to look it up if you didn't understand its
meaning?

On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 14:15:18 -0000
"tim..." wrote:
wrote in message news
And I doubt many of them voted leave not that I give a **** about their
opinions in this context anyway.


apparently, a large number of the 50s generation of immigrates voted to
reduce the current lot of immigrants

Yes, I've read that too. Seems in certain parts of London they're not happy
about their ethnic culture being diluted by the mass immigration of eastern
europeans. Funny what goes around comes around isn't it. Guess they didn't get
the memo about "celebrating diversity" from The Guardian and all the *******
in Islington.

--
Spud

wrote:

On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 12:32:45 +0000
(Mark Bestley) wrote:
Roland Perry wrote:

In message , at 10:28:50 on Wed, 16 Nov
2016, d remarked:
Pity May didn't trigger it while she had the chance before those
immigrants won that legal challenge (one can only hope one night down
a dark alley...).

Racist and fascist.

Racist? Against which race exactly? Be specific.

A racism charge doesn't have to specify a specific race.

As for fascist I can't think of anything more pro-authoritarian than some
people who weren't even born here who seem to think they have to the right
to
question the implementation of the result of a referendum of the natives.

Gosh, you are confused. Many of the people with a vote in this country
weren't born here (if that's what you mean by 'native').

And many people who were born here did not have a vote e.g. those using
EU freedom of movement to work in Europe.

There's a reason there's an "ex" in ex-pat.

So you don't want immigrants to UK to vote because they wern't born here
and you don't want people who were born here to be able to vote either.
That does not make any sense.



--
Mark

On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 14:55:16 +0000
(Mark Bestley) wrote:
wrote:

On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 12:32:45 +0000
(Mark Bestley) wrote:
Roland Perry wrote:

In message , at 10:28:50 on Wed, 16 Nov
2016, d remarked:
Pity May didn't trigger it while she had the chance before those
immigrants won that legal challenge (one can only hope one night down
a dark alley...).

Racist and fascist.

Racist? Against which race exactly? Be specific.

A racism charge doesn't have to specify a specific race.

As for fascist I can't think of anything more pro-authoritarian than some
people who weren't even born here who seem to think they have to the
right
to
question the implementation of the result of a referendum of the natives.

Gosh, you are confused. Many of the people with a vote in this country
weren't born here (if that's what you mean by 'native').

And many people who were born here did not have a vote e.g. those using
EU freedom of movement to work in Europe.

There's a reason there's an "ex" in ex-pat.

So you don't want immigrants to UK to vote because they wern't born here
and you don't want people who were born here to be able to vote either.
That does not make any sense.

Born here and living here. If you've ****ed off to live in another country
you absolve any right to have an influence on whether your country of birth
remains in the EU since it is no longer your concern. And if all those chavs
and criminals living on the costas are worried about their status when we
exit then they should apply for Spanish citizenship. Ditto anywhere else.

--
Spud

Martin Coffee wrote:
On 16/11/16 14:38, tim... wrote:

"tim..." wrote in message
news

wrote in message news On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 10:43:33 +0000
Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 10:28:50 on Wed, 16 Nov
2016, d remarked:
Pity May didn't trigger it while she had the chance before those
immigrants
won that legal challenge (one can only hope one night down a dark
alley...).

Racist and fascist.

Racist? Against which race exactly? Be specific.

A racism charge doesn't have to specify a specific race.

Not for a delusional **** spewing liberal no, but for any rational
thinking
person, yes, it does otherwise the term is meaningless other than a
playground
insult designed to shut down debate.

As for fascist I can't think of anything more pro-authoritarian
than some
people who weren't even born here who seem to think they have to
the right to
question the implementation of the result of a referendum of the
natives.

Gosh, you are confused. Many of the people with a vote in this country
weren't born here (if that's what you mean by 'native').

And I doubt many of them voted leave not that I give a **** about their
opinions in this context anyway.


apparently, a large number of the 50s generation of immigrates voted to

Hm, what on earth is an immigrate?

Oops

tim

Google should be your friend.
https://www.google.com/search?as_q=i...pe=&as_rights=
Why couldn't you be bothered to look it up if you didn't understand its
meaning?

It's a verb, not a noun.

On 16/11/16 15:27, Recliner wrote:
Martin Coffee wrote:
On 16/11/16 14:38, tim... wrote:

"tim..." wrote in message
news
wrote in message news On Wed, 16 Nov 2016 10:43:33 +0000
Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 10:28:50 on Wed, 16 Nov
2016, d remarked:
Pity May didn't trigger it while she had the chance before those
immigrants
won that legal challenge (one can only hope one night down a dark
alley...).

Racist and fascist.

Racist? Against which race exactly? Be specific.

A racism charge doesn't have to specify a specific race.

Not for a delusional **** spewing liberal no, but for any rational
thinking
person, yes, it does otherwise the term is meaningless other than a
playground
insult designed to shut down debate.

As for fascist I can't think of anything more pro-authoritarian
than some
people who weren't even born here who seem to think they have to
the right to
question the implementation of the result of a referendum of the
natives.

Gosh, you are confused. Many of the people with a vote in this country
weren't born here (if that's what you mean by 'native').

And I doubt many of them voted leave not that I give a **** about their
opinions in this context anyway.


apparently, a large number of the 50s generation of immigrates voted to

Hm, what on earth is an immigrate?

Oops

tim

Google should be your friend.
https://www.google.com/search?as_q=i...pe=&as_rights=
Why couldn't you be bothered to look it up if you didn't understand its
meaning?

It's a verb, not a noun.

But it's meaning in this case was obvious.