Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Basil Jet wrote:
http://www.networkrailmediacentre.co...rk-is-required http://www.barking-gospeloak.org.uk/...ss_release.pdf It looks like NR is trying to pass the blame on to the contractors: "Along the 14-mile route, a number of the structures, which carry the overhead lines, were incorrectly designed and couldn’t be installed at the planned locations. Late delivery of materials and structures also led to further delays." I think NR would have used different words if the faults had been its own. TfL must be secretly relieved that this takes away the pressure to transfer some old electric 4-car trains on to the line before the new class 710s arrive. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Network Rail "incorrectly designed" the Gospel Oak - | London Transport | |||
Network Rail "incorrectly designed" the Gospel Oak - | London Transport | |||
Gospel Oak-Barking | London Transport | |||
SPECS installation in Gospel Oak? | London Transport | |||
Gospel Oak - Barking | London Transport |