Ding Bat wrote:
On Thursday, May 25, 2017 at 9:26:07 PM UTC+5:30, Recliner wrote:
Ding Bat wrote:
On Wednesday, May 24, 2017 at 6:56:58 PM UTC+5:30, Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 11:37:18 on
Tue, 23 May 2017, Recliner remarked:
"Lots of people fly into Heathrow wanting to visit ExCel? Really??"
During major exhibitions - yes - absolutely. For example, World Travel
Mart (held at Excel) is a "must attend" event in the travel business -
there are loads of people who fly in specifically to attend it. City
airport is much handier for Excel, but there are loads of places
(especially long haul) which don't have flights into City.

I'm aware of that show, and even have friends in that business (from
overseas) who exhibit. They fly in and out of Luton, incidentally.

It is, however, a tiny number of people compared to the million a day
who are predicted to use Crossrail, or the 80,000 a day who use
Heathrow.

Like other shows at Excel, it attracts about 15-20,000 a day, of whom
3,000 a day are actual travel buyers.

Out of that lot if more than 1,000 each of the three days have flown in
through Heathrow, rather than being based in the UK or using other
airports, E* etc to arrive from abroad, I'll eat my hat.

Of course, 1,000 top quality buyers is plenty if you have a selling
booth at WTM, but it's not a number to build a railway timetable around.

No, but we were discussing the attractions of Crossrail vs HEx. Any of
those visitors who currently use Heathrow and HEx will certainly
switch to Crossrail. And some who previously flew to Luton may switch
to LHR and Crossrail, too. Or they can change at Farringdon to
Crossrail.

It's just one example of the many flows that will use Crossrail rather
than HEx.

Yes, lots of "only quite a few" passengers.
--
Roland Perry

Does HEx have to continue to terminate at Paddington? Can't it go nonstop
to Paddington and then continue to Abbey Wood with the same stops as what
will replace Heathrow Connect?

Even if that were possible, how could it attract a premium fare in such a
case? And how could such a premium fare be enforced?

There would be more passengers available to pay a premium, to offset the
loss of passengers to the non-express Crossrail. Think Liverpool St to
Heathrow with its being express after Paddington. Some proportion of
passengers would choose to pay the premium for the time saving and if the
express is less full, they'd also be paying the premium for comfort (not
having to stand) if the premium keeps passenger count low enough for all,
or all in Heathrow designated carriages, to get seats. Remember that
standing would be more of a drag for those who have luggage.

How could it be express after Padd? The Crossrail tunnels connect to the
Relief, not the Main lines.

Anyway, it's now academic, as HAL has lost the case.

"Recliner" wrote in message
...

Anyway, it's now academic, as HAL has lost the case.


until they appeal :-)

(I have no idea if that is likely as the legal arguments on which they lost
are beyond me)

tim

tim... wrote:


"Recliner" wrote in message
...

Anyway, it's now academic, as HAL has lost the case.


until they appeal :-)

(I have no idea if that is likely as the legal arguments on which they lost
are beyond me)

No, they have now exhausted the appeals procedures.

"Recliner" wrote in message
...
tim... wrote:


"Recliner" wrote in message
...

Anyway, it's now academic, as HAL has lost the case.


until they appeal :-)

(I have no idea if that is likely as the legal arguments on which they
lost
are beyond me)

No, they have now exhausted the appeals procedures.

have they?

this was a judgment by a single judge at the high court

is there really not a higher court they can apply to

In message
-sept
ember.org, at 15:58:54 on Fri, 26 May 2017, Recliner
remarked:

Think Liverpool St to
Heathrow with its being express after Paddington.
....
How could it be express after Padd? The Crossrail tunnels connect to the
Relief, not the Main lines.

I already covered that aspect in my remarks about a flat junction at
Paddington.

Anyway, it's now academic, as HAL has lost the case.

Thanks for the info.
--
Roland Perry