Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 13:36:20 on Fri, 26 May
2017, Basil Jet remarked:

The cover is lilac.

The only differences I've spotted are obeli added to various Waterloo
served stations, and Cambridge North. There is no indication that there
are hardly any trains serving both Cambridge North and Waterbeach,
which somewhat defeats the point of a map at all.

Are there any maps which indicate that sort of thing?



Something which shows *routes* rather than *lines* - early VWC route maps
for example.

http://www.projectmapping.co.uk/Reviews/Resources/Virgin%20WC%20Dec%2008%20tmbtbl%20map.jpg


Anna Noyd-Dryver

In message , at 14:26:23 on Fri, 26 May 2017,
Anna Noyd-Dryver remarked:
The only differences I've spotted are obeli added to various Waterloo
served stations, and Cambridge North. There is no indication that there
are hardly any trains serving both Cambridge North and Waterbeach,
which somewhat defeats the point of a map at all.

Are there any maps which indicate that sort of thing?

Something which shows *routes* rather than *lines* - early VWC route maps
for example.

http://www.projectmapping.co.uk/Reviews/Resources/Virgin%20WC%20Dec%2008%20tmbtbl%20map.jpg

OK, I'll hand you that one.

There are similar maps published by GN - although I note this one
doesn't have Cambridge North - Doh!

http://www.nationalrail.co.uk/static...eat_Northern_r
oute_map.pdf
--
Roland Perry

In article , (Roland Perry)
wrote:

There are similar maps published by GN - although I note this one
doesn't have Cambridge North - Doh!


http://www.nationalrail.co.uk/static...orthern_route_
map.pdf

Plonkers!

--
Colin Rosenstiel