Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 21:29:45 on
Wed, 13 Sep 2017, Recliner remarked: Section 6.8.6 says "If you make a journey using pay as you go on a bus or tram, you can make a second bus or tram journey for free within one hour of first touching in." As has been noted already, that is ambiguous. I don't find it ambiguous at all. To me, it's perfectly clear that it means your second touch-in will be free if it's within 60 minutes of the first. Yes, because I can easily conclude they are (from the public perspective anyway) falling between two stools of dumbing-down and using internal jargon. Thus the public might feel that a more accurate clause was: "If you COMPLETE ONE journey using pay as you go on a bus or tram, you can START a second bus or tram journey for free within one hour of first touching in." But the author sees: "If you MAKE A TOUCH-IN using pay as you go on a bus or tram, you can MAKE a second bus or tram TOUCH-IN for free within one hour of first touching in." There's another kind of "make" jargon in the Fire Brigade. By default they send two pumps, but the officer in charge can radio in "Make pumps four". Which doesn't mean "please place an order with the manufacturer to make four more pumps", but "make THE NUMBER OF pumps HERE INCREASE TO four". -- Roland Perry |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 14/09/2017 07:08, Roland Perry wrote:
Thus the public might feel that a more accurate clause was: "If you COMPLETE ONE journey using pay as you go on a bus or tram, you can START a second bus or tram journey for free within one hour of first touching in." But the author sees: "If you MAKE A TOUCH-IN using pay as you go on a bus or tram, you can MAKE a second bus or tram TOUCH-IN for free within one hour of first touching in." I agree its ambiguous, but the former is surely intended. But what happens if you have to catch a 3rd bus because the 2nd one is terminated early? A couple of times recently on a bus that I've been using the driver has had instructions sent in by radio to stop his service prematurely, perhaps because of congestion or too many of the same route number in a convoy. So I've had to get off and get on another bus that is following the same route. This doesn't cause me more than mild annoyance as I have a bus pass, but if you are using Oyster would this be included in the 2nd-bus-within-an-hour concession, and if so how does the system handle it? -- Clive Page |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 11:49:08 on Thu, 14
Sep 2017, Clive Page remarked: On 14/09/2017 07:08, Roland Perry wrote: Thus the public might feel that a more accurate clause was: "If you COMPLETE ONE journey using pay as you go on a bus or tram, you can START a second bus or tram journey for free within one hour of first touching in." But the author sees: "If you MAKE A TOUCH-IN using pay as you go on a bus or tram, you can MAKE a second bus or tram TOUCH-IN for free within one hour of first touching in." I agree its ambiguous, but the former is surely intended. But what happens if you have to catch a 3rd bus because the 2nd one is terminated early? A couple of times recently on a bus that I've been using the driver has had instructions sent in by radio to stop his service prematurely, perhaps because of congestion or too many of the same route number in a convoy. So I've had to get off and get on another bus that is following the same route. This doesn't cause me more than mild annoyance as I have a bus pass, but if you are using Oyster would this be included in the 2nd-bus-within-an-hour concession, and if so how does the system handle it? Back in the day wasn't the driver of the terminating bus supposed to give you a chitty to show the following driver? -- Roland Perry |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 14/09/2017 12:08, Roland Perry wrote:
Back in the day wasn't the driver of the terminating bus supposed to give you a chitty to show the following driver? Yes, well remembered. Today I was in London and, would you believe it, the second bus I took was terminated early. So this must happen quite often. Surely somebody knows the solution to what must be a common problem? Or are bus fares so cheap that nobody cares any longer? -- Clive Page |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Clive Page wrote:
On 14/09/2017 12:08, Roland Perry wrote: Back in the day wasn't the driver of the terminating bus supposed to give you a chitty to show the following driver? Yes, well remembered. Today I was in London and, would you believe it, the second bus I took was terminated early. So this must happen quite often. Surely somebody knows the solution to what must be a common problem? Or are bus fares so cheap that nobody cares any longer? Probably, most people on the bus aren't paying at all, as they're covered by bus passes, Freedom cards, Travelcards, Season Tickets, Oyster capping, Hopper fares, Zip Oyster photocards, etc. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Clive Page wrote:
Or are bus fares so cheap that nobody cares any longer? Even: if tickets cost a pound apiece, why should you make a fuss? #Paul |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
Clive Page wrote: Or are bus fares so cheap that nobody cares any longer? Even: if tickets cost a pound apiece, why should you make a fuss? £1.50 |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
TfL two buses for the price of one starts Today (Hopper) | London Transport | |||
Two hour Central line shut down during evening rush hour | London Transport | |||
There are now more blacks in England than in some African countries,many of which are far larger than the UK. | London Transport | |||
There are now more blacks in England than in some African countries,many of which are far larger than the UK. | London Transport | |||
Long-lasting ticket to Brighton | London Transport |