Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
tim... wrote:
"John Levine" wrote in message news ![]() In article , tim... wrote: tenants don't benefit from the increase in value of the property No, but they presumably benefit from better access to transport. probably not from any stations south of Wimbledon aren't they just going to keep the service frequency that they have now It's not clear from the report whether this funding charge would extend to distant stations whose existing services would simply be diverted through the tunnel. Arguably, they would still get some benefit, but much less than people who get a new station with a new high frequency service. Also, it would be possible to increase services on the peripheral branches, should there be the demand, as more services could pass through the tunnel than can terminate and reverse at Waterloo. For example, Crossrail will be providing 6 tph to Heathrow compared to the 2 tph HCon service it replaces. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
"Crossrail budget may be slashed by a third" | London Transport | |||
Fwd: Planets Gather on May 5 and May 17, 2000 | London Transport | |||
Independent article: Livingstone may run London rail network | London Transport | |||
East London Line may be shelved until at least 2010 | London Transport |