Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Robin9 wrote:
'Recliner[_3_ Wrote: ;169914']Robin9 wrote:- I travelled on Goblin yesterday. For a Saturday, the trains were surprisingly full and standing. Reverting to a half-hourly service does not seem to have depressed patronage. - Hello, old friend: https://www.flickr.com/photos/140710651@N05/47582770322 Those 172s will be more appropriate in their new home than on Goblin where their full potential was never released. They have a pretty high top speed and can accelerate quickly, but the Goblin run does not provide an opportunity for either. I'd enjoy a journey from Leamington Spa to Coventry on a 172. Yes, they were specified from the beginning for regional, rather than urban metro, services, hence the transverse seats. They were always intended as an interim solution, pending electrification. If all had gone to plan, they'd have been replaced a couple of years ago by 4-car EMUs. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
A40 Westway yesterday morning | London Transport | |||
Route 127 minor hostage thing yesterday | London Transport | |||
What happened on the Victoria line yesterday? | London Transport | |||
Special on District line yesterday (7088+7075) | London Transport | |||
Yesterday i noticed a depression on a bridge | London Transport |