London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21   Report Post  
Old April 4th 19, 01:21 PM posted to uk.transport.london,uk.railway
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Aug 2003
Posts: 10,125
Default Crossrail in trouble - again!

In message , at 08:04:06 on Thu, 4 Apr
2019, Someone Somewhere remarked:

I understand removing overtime, but surely they could have finished one
or more of the stations by now? If so, then any associated workforce
may be able to be used on other parts of the project to not slow that
down any further.


While they all might look identical in their orange outfits, in practice
they have many different skills and are employed by many different
contractors. Some skills/employments may be transferable, but lots
aren't.
--
Roland Perry

  #22   Report Post  
Old April 4th 19, 01:35 PM posted to uk.transport.london,uk.railway
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Aug 2003
Posts: 10,125
Default Crossrail in trouble - again!

In message , at 10:18:55 on Thu, 4 Apr 2019,
Recliner remarked:

I think, by definition, some stations still have lots more work to do,
which is why the opening has been delayed so much.


I'm far from convinced the stations themselves are on the critical path.
Signalling (installation/testing) is likely to be the main hold up.
--
Roland Perry
  #23   Report Post  
Old April 4th 19, 02:52 PM posted to uk.transport.london,uk.railway
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jan 2011
Posts: 466
Default Crossrail in trouble - again!

On 04/04/2019 14:21, Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 08:04:06 on Thu, 4 Apr
2019, Someone Somewhere remarked:

I understand removing overtime, but surely they could have finished
one or more of the stations by now?Â* If so, then any associated
workforce may be able to be used on other parts of the project to not
slow that down any further.


While they all might look identical in their orange outfits, in practice
they have many different skills and are employed by many different
contractors. Some skills/employments may be transferable, but lots aren't.


True - but with a station you have the people who do lifts, who do
tiles, who do other decoration, who install ticket barriers, the
sparkies, etc etc, but each station at various times will need each of
the sets...
  #24   Report Post  
Old April 5th 19, 09:51 AM posted to uk.transport.london,uk.railway
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Aug 2003
Posts: 10,125
Default Crossrail in trouble - again!

In message , at 15:52:30 on Thu, 4 Apr
2019, Someone Somewhere remarked:
On 04/04/2019 14:21, Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 08:04:06 on Thu, 4 Apr
2019, Someone Somewhere remarked:

I understand removing overtime, but surely they could have finished
one or more of the stations by now?* If so, then any associated
workforce may be able to be used on other parts of the project to not
slow that down any further.

While they all might look identical in their orange outfits, in
practice they have many different skills and are employed by many
different contractors. Some skills/employments may be transferable,
but lots aren't.


True - but with a station you have the people who do lifts, who do
tiles, who do other decoration, who install ticket barriers, the
sparkies, etc etc, but each station at various times will need each of
the sets...


That doesn't help much if the stations are being fitted out by different
contracting firms.
--
Roland Perry
  #25   Report Post  
Old April 5th 19, 09:59 AM posted to uk.railway,uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,990
Default Crossrail in trouble - again!

Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 15:52:30 on Thu, 4 Apr
2019, Someone Somewhere remarked:
On 04/04/2019 14:21, Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 08:04:06 on Thu, 4 Apr
2019, Someone Somewhere remarked:

I understand removing overtime, but surely they could have finished
one or more of the stations by now?Â* If so, then any associated
workforce may be able to be used on other parts of the project to not
slow that down any further.
While they all might look identical in their orange outfits, in
practice they have many different skills and are employed by many
different contractors. Some skills/employments may be transferable,
but lots aren't.


True - but with a station you have the people who do lifts, who do
tiles, who do other decoration, who install ticket barriers, the
sparkies, etc etc, but each station at various times will need each of
the sets...


That doesn't help much if the stations are being fitted out by different
contracting firms.


The actual workers are unlikely to be directly employed by the main
contractors.



  #26   Report Post  
Old April 5th 19, 12:25 PM posted to uk.railway,uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jan 2015
Posts: 355
Default Crossrail in trouble - again!

Graeme Wall wrote:
On 03/04/2019 15:11, Basil Jet wrote:
On 03/04/2019 11:47, Graeme Wall wrote:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-47787367


"None of the stations are yet finished"

Surprising word order aside, that is staggering. How could every one of
them be running late? Weren't they built by different contractors?


I was rather confused by the statement that some sections were now
operating, I assume they were referring to testing, though Paddington -
Reading wasn't included


Liverpool St ("upstairs") - Shenfield and Paddington ("upstairs") - Hayes
are operated by TfL Rail using 345s; Padd-Heathrow stopper is operated by
TfL Rail using 360s.


Anna Noyd-Dryver

  #27   Report Post  
Old April 5th 19, 12:25 PM posted to uk.railway,uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jan 2015
Posts: 355
Default Crossrail in trouble - again!

Recliner wrote:
Someone Somewhere wrote:
On 03/04/2019 23:08, Recliner wrote:
Someone Somewhere wrote:
On 03/04/2019 15:24, Recliner wrote:
Basil Jet wrote:
On 03/04/2019 11:47, Graeme Wall wrote:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-47787367

"None of the stations are yet finished"

Surprising word order aside, that is staggering. How could every one of
them be running late? Weren't they built by different contractors?


Yes. I suspect that once the opening was delayed, they cut back on the
overtime working that would have been required for even the most complete
stations to meet the December 2018 target date. It's cheaper to complete
the stations at a more relaxed pace.

How much overtime weere they planning to work? The delay was finally
admitted 4 months before opening, which was 5 months ago - even if
everyone was working double shifts they should have finished by now...


I believe a few of the new stations could have been just about ready to
open, but not necessarily complete, by the December target date; at least a
couple were many months behind, and wouldn't have been able to open at all
by then. Now, they can take their time to finish even the near-complete
stations.

It's obviously extraordinary that the widespread delays to the stations,
train signalling and testing weren't noticed (or at least reported) by the
management until so close to the planned opening date. Was it a deliberate
cover-up, or just incompetence at the senior management and political
levels (or both)?

I understand removing overtime, but surely they could have finished one
or more of the stations by now? If so, then any associated workforce
may be able to be used on other parts of the project to not slow that
down any further.


There's no point rushing to finish a station, then moth-balling it for a
year or so. What they did have to finish quickly was any trackside work,
such as installing the PEDs, so that it didn't get in the way of test
running.

In any case, the stations will be at different levels of completion. Some
may still be having wiring, lifts and escalators installed, while the more
complete ones are probably just getting the final decorative finishing.



....which are all likely to involve different teams of people. Getting the
lifts finished earlier at one station doesn’t mean you’ll be able to send
those same workers to complete the tiling at another station.


Anna Noyd-Dryver

  #28   Report Post  
Old April 5th 19, 04:46 PM posted to uk.railway,uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jan 2011
Posts: 466
Default Crossrail in trouble - again!

On 05/04/2019 13:25, Anna Noyd-Dryver wrote:
Recliner wrote:
Someone Somewhere wrote:
On 03/04/2019 23:08, Recliner wrote:
Someone Somewhere wrote:
On 03/04/2019 15:24, Recliner wrote:
Basil Jet wrote:
On 03/04/2019 11:47, Graeme Wall wrote:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-47787367

"None of the stations are yet finished"

Surprising word order aside, that is staggering. How could every one of
them be running late? Weren't they built by different contractors?


Yes. I suspect that once the opening was delayed, they cut back on the
overtime working that would have been required for even the most complete
stations to meet the December 2018 target date. It's cheaper to complete
the stations at a more relaxed pace.

How much overtime weere they planning to work? The delay was finally
admitted 4 months before opening, which was 5 months ago - even if
everyone was working double shifts they should have finished by now...


I believe a few of the new stations could have been just about ready to
open, but not necessarily complete, by the December target date; at least a
couple were many months behind, and wouldn't have been able to open at all
by then. Now, they can take their time to finish even the near-complete
stations.

It's obviously extraordinary that the widespread delays to the stations,
train signalling and testing weren't noticed (or at least reported) by the
management until so close to the planned opening date. Was it a deliberate
cover-up, or just incompetence at the senior management and political
levels (or both)?

I understand removing overtime, but surely they could have finished one
or more of the stations by now? If so, then any associated workforce
may be able to be used on other parts of the project to not slow that
down any further.


There's no point rushing to finish a station, then moth-balling it for a
year or so. What they did have to finish quickly was any trackside work,
such as installing the PEDs, so that it didn't get in the way of test
running.

In any case, the stations will be at different levels of completion. Some
may still be having wiring, lifts and escalators installed, while the more
complete ones are probably just getting the final decorative finishing.



...which are all likely to involve different teams of people. Getting the
lifts finished earlier at one station doesn’t mean you’ll be able to send
those same workers to complete the tiling at another station.


No but the lift people may well be the same lift people at different
stations, ditto tilers and so on.

Also, if you complete and mothball a station at least you know it's
finished and you're not predicating your plan on the continued
availability of different things or certain trades which may well have
gone out of stock, changed or become unavailable before you get around
to finishing the station.

Also, what does it realistically cost to mothball a station as opposed
to going slow on the construction?

  #29   Report Post  
Old April 5th 19, 09:51 PM posted to uk.transport.london,uk.railway
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Oct 2014
Posts: 2,990
Default Crossrail in trouble - again!

Someone Somewhere wrote:
On 05/04/2019 13:25, Anna Noyd-Dryver wrote:
Recliner wrote:
Someone Somewhere wrote:
On 03/04/2019 23:08, Recliner wrote:
Someone Somewhere wrote:
On 03/04/2019 15:24, Recliner wrote:
Basil Jet wrote:
On 03/04/2019 11:47, Graeme Wall wrote:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-47787367

"None of the stations are yet finished"

Surprising word order aside, that is staggering. How could every one of
them be running late? Weren't they built by different contractors?


Yes. I suspect that once the opening was delayed, they cut back on the
overtime working that would have been required for even the most complete
stations to meet the December 2018 target date. It's cheaper to complete
the stations at a more relaxed pace.

How much overtime weere they planning to work? The delay was finally
admitted 4 months before opening, which was 5 months ago - even if
everyone was working double shifts they should have finished by now...


I believe a few of the new stations could have been just about ready to
open, but not necessarily complete, by the December target date; at least a
couple were many months behind, and wouldn't have been able to open at all
by then. Now, they can take their time to finish even the near-complete
stations.

It's obviously extraordinary that the widespread delays to the stations,
train signalling and testing weren't noticed (or at least reported) by the
management until so close to the planned opening date. Was it a deliberate
cover-up, or just incompetence at the senior management and political
levels (or both)?

I understand removing overtime, but surely they could have finished one
or more of the stations by now? If so, then any associated workforce
may be able to be used on other parts of the project to not slow that
down any further.


There's no point rushing to finish a station, then moth-balling it for a
year or so. What they did have to finish quickly was any trackside work,
such as installing the PEDs, so that it didn't get in the way of test
running.

In any case, the stations will be at different levels of completion. Some
may still be having wiring, lifts and escalators installed, while the more
complete ones are probably just getting the final decorative finishing.



...which are all likely to involve different teams of people. Getting the
lifts finished earlier at one station doesn’t mean you’ll be able to send
those same workers to complete the tiling at another station.


No but the lift people may well be the same lift people at different
stations, ditto tilers and so on.


They probably all work for subcontractors or are self-employed anyway.


Also, if you complete and mothball a station at least you know it's
finished and you're not predicating your plan on the continued
availability of different things or certain trades which may well have
gone out of stock, changed or become unavailable before you get around
to finishing the station.


We're not talking about a delay of years, just taking a few weeks or months
longer to complete the stations that were almost ready.


Also, what does it realistically cost to mothball a station as opposed
to going slow on the construction?


It's not so much a case of deliberately going slow, but saving money by no
longer working to a tight deadline.





Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The blog on Pc trouble shooting skills,Networking,Linux luck London Transport 0 January 25th 07 10:43 AM
Trouble finding a hotel! Mark W. Shelby London Transport 17 October 21st 06 07:51 AM
Oyster trouble Dave Arquati London Transport 10 May 29th 05 05:43 AM
A Little Trouble with my Oyster... Helen Deborah Vecht London Transport 20 February 25th 05 08:20 PM
Driver in Trouble over Stone Throwers Joe Patrick London Transport 9 August 10th 03 07:24 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:43 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 London Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about London Transport"

 

Copyright © 2017