Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 22:31:47 on Tue, 16 Jul 2019, Charles Ellson remarked: What's the desire for a removeable battery these days? I get that batteries die progressively after a couple of years or more, but until then portable power banks are higher capacity and more flexible (you can use them with multiple things!) than a spare battery. I suppose if there was a thin power bank I could superglue to the back of a phone, and have an unobtrusive permanently connected cable, that might just substitute for having a phone where I can change a normal battery in under a minute. But I suspect that the power bank wouldn't do a pass-through for connecting to the phone's internal storage. How do you suggest fixing that? Clip-on/piggy-back power banks with USB pass through are available but you're probably stuffed if you haven't got an iPhone or a Samsung Galaxy. Now you mention it, I did once have a case for a smartphone that had power bank integrated, which meant having a pass-through connector. But the battery inside that died very quickly (a matter of months). The fact they are so rare makes me think there's something systemically wrong with them. Is it also perhaps because the backs of phones increasingly have buttons and camera lenses/flashes and so on - which would tend to get obscured unless the case had exactly the correct cut-outs in it. The case has to be designed to fit the size, shape and connectors of the phone anyway; putting holes in the right place for camera, microphone, speaker etc isn’t rocket science. Plain cases for every variety of phone manage it, so do the powered cases. Anna Noyd-Dryver |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 08:49:30 on Wed, 17 Jul
2019, Anna Noyd-Dryver remarked: Now you mention it, I did once have a case for a smartphone that had power bank integrated, which meant having a pass-through connector. But the battery inside that died very quickly (a matter of months). The fact they are so rare makes me think there's something systemically wrong with them. Is it also perhaps because the backs of phones increasingly have buttons and camera lenses/flashes and so on - which would tend to get obscured unless the case had exactly the correct cut-outs in it. The case has to be designed to fit the size, shape and connectors of the phone anyway; putting holes in the right place for camera, microphone, speaker etc isn’t rocket science. Plain cases for every variety of phone manage it, so do the powered cases. I just went to Amazon to look, for my LG phone. A choice of 13 products, every single one "Currently unavailable". -- Roland Perry |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 08:49:30 on Wed, 17 Jul 2019, Anna Noyd-Dryver remarked: Now you mention it, I did once have a case for a smartphone that had power bank integrated, which meant having a pass-through connector. But the battery inside that died very quickly (a matter of months). The fact they are so rare makes me think there's something systemically wrong with them. Is it also perhaps because the backs of phones increasingly have buttons and camera lenses/flashes and so on - which would tend to get obscured unless the case had exactly the correct cut-outs in it. The case has to be designed to fit the size, shape and connectors of the phone anyway; putting holes in the right place for camera, microphone, speaker etc isn’t rocket science. Plain cases for every variety of phone manage it, so do the powered cases. I just went to Amazon to look, for my LG phone. A choice of 13 products, every single one "Currently unavailable". Presumably because your phone is ancient? The assumption is that people buy accessories when they first buy a phone, not when they unearth one in an archaeological dig. Of course, there's a small chance you might be able to find a well-used one on eBay. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 17/07/2019 10:30, Recliner wrote:
Roland Perry wrote: I just went to Amazon to look, for my LG phone. A choice of 13 products, every single one "Currently unavailable". Presumably because your phone is ancient? The assumption is that people buy accessories when they first buy a phone, not when they unearth one in an archaeological dig. Ooh, that's a bit strong..! What's wrong with old phones, anyway..? As long as they work, keep on using them, that's what I say. Besides, a case may well have been bought with the phone, but has worn out. I've replaced phone cases many times. -- Ria in Aberdeen [Send address is invalid, use sipsoup at gmail dot com to reply direct] |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 15:59:49 on Wed, 17
Jul 2019, MissRiaElaine remarked: On 17/07/2019 10:30, Recliner wrote: Roland Perry wrote: I just went to Amazon to look, for my LG phone. A choice of 13 products, every single one "Currently unavailable". Presumably because your phone is ancient? The assumption is that people buy accessories when they first buy a phone, not when they unearth one in an archaeological dig. Ooh, that's a bit strong..! He's got out of bed the wrong side again. What's wrong with old phones, anyway..? As long as they work, keep on using them, that's what I say. Besides, a case may well have been bought with the phone, but has worn out. I've replaced phone cases many times. I agree. And it's when a phone is getting older that replacing the battery becomes a thing, and that includes work-arounds like these power-bank-cases. -- Roland Perry |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 17 Jul 2019 15:59:49 +0100, MissRiaElaine wrote:
On 17/07/2019 10:30, Recliner wrote: Roland Perry wrote: I just went to Amazon to look, for my LG phone. A choice of 13 products, every single one "Currently unavailable". Presumably because your phone is ancient? The assumption is that people buy accessories when they first buy a phone, not when they unearth one in an archaeological dig. Ooh, that's a bit strong..! What's wrong with old phones, anyway..? For a 'dumbphone', not a lot. Using a smartphone once it no longer receives security patches isn't something I would do personally. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 17/07/2019 16:15, David Walters wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jul 2019 15:59:49 +0100, MissRiaElaine wrote: On 17/07/2019 10:30, Recliner wrote: Roland Perry wrote: I just went to Amazon to look, for my LG phone. A choice of 13 products, every single one "Currently unavailable". Presumably because your phone is ancient? The assumption is that people buy accessories when they first buy a phone, not when they unearth one in an archaeological dig. Ooh, that's a bit strong..! What's wrong with old phones, anyway..? For a 'dumbphone', not a lot. Using a smartphone once it no longer receives security patches isn't something I would do personally. I've given up on 'smart' phones, I don't like the potential for tracking and the likes of Google et al knowing where I am 24/7, nor having to charge it every day at minimum. I still use the one I have (Samsung S5 mini) as a portable data terminal for things like 2-factor authorisation etc. but there isn't a SIM in it any more and it never leaves the house. In 'flight' mode the battery lasts almost a week, good enough for me. As for phones, the Nokia 6310i reigns supreme..! I also recently unearthed my old Nokia 6150, which still works on its 18yr old battery, which although it uses the battery faster than the 6310i, still lasts a week on standby. -- Ria in Aberdeen [Send address is invalid, use sipsoup at gmail dot com to reply direct] |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
MissRiaElaine wrote:
On 17/07/2019 16:15, David Walters wrote: On Wed, 17 Jul 2019 15:59:49 +0100, MissRiaElaine wrote: On 17/07/2019 10:30, Recliner wrote: Roland Perry wrote: I just went to Amazon to look, for my LG phone. A choice of 13 products, every single one "Currently unavailable". Presumably because your phone is ancient? The assumption is that people buy accessories when they first buy a phone, not when they unearth one in an archaeological dig. Ooh, that's a bit strong..! What's wrong with old phones, anyway..? For a 'dumbphone', not a lot. Using a smartphone once it no longer receives security patches isn't something I would do personally. I've given up on 'smart' phones, I don't like the potential for tracking and the likes of Google et al knowing where I am 24/7, nor having to charge it every day at minimum. I still use the one I have (Samsung S5 mini) as a portable data terminal for things like 2-factor authorisation etc. but there isn't a SIM in it any more and it never leaves the house. In 'flight' mode the battery lasts almost a week, good enough for me. As for phones, the Nokia 6310i reigns supreme..! I also recently unearthed my old Nokia 6150, which still works on its 18yr old battery, which although it uses the battery faster than the 6310i, still lasts a week on standby. Whereas I’m the opposite end of the phone user spectrum, I rarely use my phone for voice calls (I have done more often in the past week or so arranging car servicing etc however) or SMS (most of my contacts prefer WhatsApp), but I use my phone for everything I used to use a computer for; my laptop gets used once a month if that. Anna Noyd-Dryver |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 16:15:25 on
Wed, 17 Jul 2019, David Walters remarked: I just went to Amazon to look, for my LG phone. A choice of 13 products, every single one "Currently unavailable". Presumably because your phone is ancient? The assumption is that people buy accessories when they first buy a phone, not when they unearth one in an archaeological dig. Ooh, that's a bit strong..! What's wrong with old phones, anyway..? For a 'dumbphone', not a lot. Using a smartphone once it no longer receives security patches isn't something I would do personally. What's the main threat you are trying to avoid? -- Roland Perry |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 17 Jul 2019 19:03:26 +0100, Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 16:15:25 on Wed, 17 Jul 2019, David Walters remarked: Ooh, that's a bit strong..! What's wrong with old phones, anyway..? For a 'dumbphone', not a lot. Using a smartphone once it no longer receives security patches isn't something I would do personally. What's the main threat you are trying to avoid? Mostly some malware getting installed via a remote or drive-by vulnerability. There are undoubtedly other unpatched vulnerabilities in my smartphone but I'd rather have protection from the known ones. I also don't run Windows Vista anymore. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Sim-L-Bus | London Transport | |||
HS2 expected to run alongside a dual carriageway in the Chilterns | London Transport | |||
The little git tube worker fired! | London Transport | |||
Big Brother | London Transport | |||
Oyster=Big Brother ?? | London Transport |