Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 31 Jul 2020 21:15:53 +0100, Basil Jet
wrote: This consultation dates from 2020 BC (Before Covid) so I'm not sure if this project is even alive now. There's a map at https://www.ianvisits.co.uk/blog/202...smead-advance/ I'm mystified by the plan. Would the trains reverse at Beckton to get there? Or would Beckton have its own service and Thamesmead have its own service? Extending from Woolwich seems to make more sense - or reversing at Woolwich, since the trains actually curve around under the river to come into Woolwich from the east. This would give people in Thamesmead direct service to Woolwich and City Airport, whereas plugging them into the Beckton Branch doesn't really give them much. It would also remove the extra Thames Tunnel from the plan, so should work out cheaper. What other alternatives are there? Extend Barking Riverside under the river? Take Crossrail into Thamesmead? Some kind of high capacity local feeder system (aka tramway)? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Boris approves third Blackwall tunnel and new ferry in Thamesmead | London Transport | |||
W Thamesmead (Belmarsh on river) to Bishopsgate & Bermondsey | London Transport |