Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , writes
On Mon, 31 Aug 2020 10:58:48 +0100 Bryan Morris wrote: In message , writes On Sun, 30 Aug 2020 23:48:23 +0100 Basil Jet wrote: https://www.hamhigh.co.uk/news/herit...bridge-could-b e-demoli shed-1-6733534 Never mind demolishing it - they should reinstate the line to muswell hill. All the trackbed is still in situ from there back to highgate sidings and putting track back down and restoring highgate high level station would cost buttons in comparisons to white elephants such as crossrail. I'm pretty sure a shuttle service to and from highgate to catch the main northern line would be pretty popular given the current alternative is the bus to wood green. It's over 40 years since, as a Haringey Councillor and member of the Alexander Palace and park committee I proposed a unique light railway, part at ground level, part suspended on the old line. Funded by the, then, EEC and running from Highgate high level station I'm not convinced a light railway/tram with all the extra expense of maintaining specialised rolling stock and its own depot would be cheaper than just laying a couple of extra miles of track out from highgate depot, but either way the area needs a rail link as during (normal) rush hours its just gridlock around there. As I said, at the time, it would have been fully funded by the EEC. The stock would have been driverless and could run if required 24/7 . It was capable to be set up by demand, from one carriage to multi. It could be run on rails or be suspended. I arranged for a working model to be displayed to show the possibilities. My concern at the time, when Alexandra Palace was being rebuilt, (it had largely been destroyed in a fire in the 1960s when it was run by the GLC) was lack of mass public transport there with all the things that were planned.Plus access to the tube at Highgate from places like Muswell Hill and Crouch End A feasibility study was turned down by those who said it would ruin the Parkland Walk There's always a few nimbies. All very well saying "just laying a couple of extra miles of track out from Highgate depot" like the proposed widening of Archway Road at the same time, with nimbie demonstrations at public inquiry after public enquiry there were more than a few nimbies, and they could be aggressive. -- Bryan Morris |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bryan Morris wrote:
In message , writes On Mon, 31 Aug 2020 10:58:48 +0100 Bryan Morris wrote: In message , writes On Sun, 30 Aug 2020 23:48:23 +0100 Basil Jet wrote: https://www.hamhigh.co.uk/news/herit...bridge-could-b e-demoli shed-1-6733534 Never mind demolishing it - they should reinstate the line to muswell hill. All the trackbed is still in situ from there back to highgate sidings and putting track back down and restoring highgate high level station would cost buttons in comparisons to white elephants such as crossrail. I'm pretty sure a shuttle service to and from highgate to catch the main northern line would be pretty popular given the current alternative is the bus to wood green. It's over 40 years since, as a Haringey Councillor and member of the Alexander Palace and park committee I proposed a unique light railway, part at ground level, part suspended on the old line. Funded by the, then, EEC and running from Highgate high level station I'm not convinced a light railway/tram with all the extra expense of maintaining specialised rolling stock and its own depot would be cheaper than just laying a couple of extra miles of track out from highgate depot, but either way the area needs a rail link as during (normal) rush hours its just gridlock around there. As I said, at the time, it would have been fully funded by the EEC. The stock would have been driverless and could run if required 24/7 . It was capable to be set up by demand, from one carriage to multi. It could be run on rails or be suspended. I arranged for a working model to be displayed to show the possibilities. My concern at the time, when Alexandra Palace was being rebuilt, (it had largely been destroyed in a fire in the 1960s when it was run by the GLC) Which fire was that? I know of the large one in 1980 because the Great British Beer Festival was held there and despite the fire went ahead in marquees in the grounds . The photo of the Palace burning at night made a good cover for the programme which I still have, nowadays there would probably screams of indignation at such a photo being used in that manner. The building at the time was no longer owned by the GLC but Haringey the council you were a member of so trying to blame the GLC is either political point scoring or just poor memory. Your idea no doubt made with the best of intentions sounds out of the same mould as the monorails that by now should have been running for a couple of decades now around Southampton and Portsmouth. These ideas never seem to get beyond the artist impression in the local rag * as when looked at from a practical point of view they become anything but. The design you mention sounds like an adapted alpine ski lift. GH |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Marland
writes Bryan Morris wrote: In message , writes On Mon, 31 Aug 2020 10:58:48 +0100 Bryan Morris wrote: In message , writes On Sun, 30 Aug 2020 23:48:23 +0100 Basil Jet wrote: https://www.hamhigh.co.uk/news/herit...bridge-could-b e-demoli shed-1-6733534 Never mind demolishing it - they should reinstate the line to muswell hill. All the trackbed is still in situ from there back to highgate sidings and putting track back down and restoring highgate high level station would cost buttons in comparisons to white elephants such as crossrail. I'm pretty sure a shuttle service to and from highgate to catch the main northern line would be pretty popular given the current alternative is the bus to wood green. It's over 40 years since, as a Haringey Councillor and member of the Alexander Palace and park committee I proposed a unique light railway, part at ground level, part suspended on the old line. Funded by the, then, EEC and running from Highgate high level station I'm not convinced a light railway/tram with all the extra expense of maintaining specialised rolling stock and its own depot would be cheaper than just laying a couple of extra miles of track out from highgate depot, but either way the area needs a rail link as during (normal) rush hours its just gridlock around there. As I said, at the time, it would have been fully funded by the EEC. The stock would have been driverless and could run if required 24/7 . It was capable to be set up by demand, from one carriage to multi. It could be run on rails or be suspended. I arranged for a working model to be displayed to show the possibilities. My concern at the time, when Alexandra Palace was being rebuilt, (it had largely been destroyed in a fire in the 1960s when it was run by the GLC) Which fire was that? I know of the large one in 1980 because the Great British Beer Festival was held there and despite the fire went ahead in marquees in the grounds . The photo of the Palace burning at night made a good cover for the programme which I still have, nowadays there would probably screams of indignation at such a photo being used in that manner. The building at the time was no longer owned by the GLC but Haringey the council you were a member of so trying to blame the GLC is either political point scoring or just poor memory. Not political point scoring. Was just explaining, to those not aware, that Haringey took over the trusteeship of Alexandra Palace from the GLC in 1980 and then later in 1980 following the major fire (yes the 1960's was much smaller) and Haringey made these grandiose rebuilding plans (and overspent by £30million said by the attorney-general in 1991 to be illegal). It was supposed to be financed by the £8m dowry from the GLC and £42m insurance claim My concern at the time was with these plans, (which at the time included a hotel) that there was no adequate public transport. Hence my post. Your idea no doubt made with the best of intentions sounds out of the same mould as the monorails that by now should have been running for a couple of decades now around Southampton and Portsmouth. These ideas never seem to get beyond the artist impression in the local rag * as when looked at from a practical point of view they become anything but. The design you mention sounds like an adapted alpine ski lift. GH I suppose it was, but a feasibility study was rejected by a majority by the committee for other reasons. -- Bryan Morris |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 31 Aug 2020 17:46:41 +0100
Bryan Morris wrote: In message , writes There's always a few nimbies. All very well saying "just laying a couple of extra miles of track out from Highgate depot" like the proposed widening of Archway Road at the same time, with nimbie demonstrations at public inquiry after public enquiry there were more than a few nimbies, and they could be aggressive. To be fair , if you go into politics you have to be prepared to deal with these sorts of people. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Boltar is right. Muswell Hill will generate far more than
a few hundred passengers a day. Like Roehampton and Collier Row, it is a substantial suburban areas with no rail service at all. Residents have to travel first to Highgate, Crouch Hill or Finsbury Park to catch a train. A local railway station would be very welcome to denizens of Muswell Hill. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote:
On Mon, 31 Aug 2020 10:58:48 +0100 Bryan Morris wrote: In message , writes On Sun, 30 Aug 2020 23:48:23 +0100 Basil Jet wrote: https://www.hamhigh.co.uk/news/herit...bridge-could-b e-demoli shed-1-6733534 Never mind demolishing it - they should reinstate the line to muswell hill. All the trackbed is still in situ from there back to highgate sidings and putting track back down and restoring highgate high level station would cost buttons in comparisons to white elephants such as crossrail. I'm pretty sure a shuttle service to and from highgate to catch the main northern line would be pretty popular given the current alternative is the bus to wood green. It's over 40 years since, as a Haringey Councillor and member of the Alexander Palace and park committee I proposed a unique light railway, part at ground level, part suspended on the old line. Funded by the, then, EEC and running from Highgate high level station I'm not convinced a light railway/tram with all the extra expense of maintaining specialised rolling stock and its own depot would be cheaper than just laying a couple of extra miles of track out from highgate depot, but either way the area needs a rail link as during (normal) rush hours its just gridlock around there. Are the people in the motor vehicles all going to the same place as the train would take them? Anna Noyd-Dryver |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 1 Sep 2020 07:12:51 -0000 (UTC)
Anna Noyd-Dryver wrote: wrote: I'm not convinced a light railway/tram with all the extra expense of maintaining specialised rolling stock and its own depot would be cheaper than just laying a couple of extra miles of track out from highgate depot, but either way the area needs a rail link as during (normal) rush hours its just gridlock around there. Are the people in the motor vehicles all going to the same place as the train would take them? Don't know tbh, but there are a lot of buses that go to tube and railway stations nearby and given its a london suburb you can bet a lot of people work in town. Or did before covid. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Park Avenue, NW2 | London Transport | |||
Fwd: Planets Gather on May 5 and May 17, 2000 | London Transport | |||
Extend the ELL to Alexandra Palace? | London Transport | |||
Whitton Avenue East / West | London Transport |