Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 01 May 2021 20:29:47 +0100 (BST), Theo
wrote: In uk.railway wrote: The 83 stock was scrapped when some of the vehicles were only 15 years old. It was a bloody scandal that no one seemed interested in. But as I've said before, its easy to spend money with abandon when its not your own and comes from ticket receipts and central government. Wikipedia: With the Jubilee Line Extension in mind, it was originally planned that the 1983 Stock would be heavily refurbished to run alongside the newer 1996 Stock that entered service on the Jubilee line in 1997; the plans included replacing the single leaf doors with double doors to speed up passenger boarding. The 1983 Stock was to be given similar interiors. This was abandoned due to the cost being only 10% cheaper than re-equipping the line entirely with the 1996 Stock. Then it was proposed for the 1983 Stock to be added to the refurbished 1973 Stock on the Piccadilly line and serve the Rayners Lane - Uxbridge section of the line. This was also abandoned on the grounds of cost. Eh? Rayner's Lane to Uxbridge? Ot did I mis-read it? New car or refurb old banger for 90% of the cost? Your choice. Theo |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 01 May 2021 20:29:47 +0100 (BST)
Theo wrote: In uk.railway wrote: The 83 stock was scrapped when some of the vehicles were only 15 years old. It was a bloody scandal that no one seemed interested in. But as I've said before, its easy to spend money with abandon when its not your own and comes from ticket receipts and central government. Wikipedia: With the Jubilee Line Extension in mind, it was originally planned that the 1983 Stock would be heavily refurbished to run alongside the newer 1996 Stock that entered service on the Jubilee line in 1997; the plans included replacing the single leaf doors with double doors to speed up passenger boarding. The 1983 Stock was to be given similar interiors. This was abandoned due to the cost being only 10% cheaper than re-equipping the line entirely with the 1996 Stock. Then it was proposed for the 1983 Stock to be added to the refurbished 1973 Stock on the Piccadilly line and serve the Rayners Lane - Uxbridge section of the line. This was also abandoned on the grounds of cost. What cost, putting new line stickers in the vehicles? Sounds like an excuse. There were a couple of them sitting at cockfosters for years mouldering away then one week they vanished. New car or refurb old banger for 90% of the cost? Your choice. Its not just the financial cost, its the enviromental cost. Binning a few thousand tons of train takes a large amount of energy to recycle all the metal and no doubt the plastic and fabrics went to landfill. So in this case I'd say refurb. Plus if they were going to run on the lightly used uxbridge branch of the picc they wouldn't need anything done to them other than a clean up. Its the same excuse with the 373s, "Oh we can't find a buyer or use for them". Well ****ing well try harder. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Woolwich Ferry reopening delayed | London Transport | |||
East London Line reopening delayed until next week... | London Transport | |||
Row over platform width delays Sandhills station reopening. | London Transport | |||
My Epping and Ongar railway History website will be have a reopening next wednesday FULL HISTORY"! | London Transport | |||
Lea Bridge station reopening - meeting this Wednesday | London Transport |