![]() |
London Orbital (M25) - Service Areas
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 at 09:26:38, Ian Jelf
wrote: In message , Annabel Smyth writes like the Aire du Baie de la Somme near Abbeville I used this recently for the first time. It is - as you say - wonderful, not least because of its setting. We have been known to do a detour specifically to go there! -- Annabel Smyth http://www.amsmyth.demon.co.uk/index.html Website updated 6 June 2004 |
London Orbital (M25) - Service Areas
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 at 10:41:07, Sam Holloway
wrote: Service stations were usually traditionally named for the closest settlement. Recently, there has been a move to relabel them for much larger towns. So Hilton Park - Birmingham North, Forton (M6) became Lancaster South and Bowburn (A1(M)) became Durham. Some people protested and so a few service areas have reverted to their original names. Sam The one at Stansted's always been Birchanger, I think, although Stansted is the more recognisable place-name. -- Annabel Smyth http://www.amsmyth.demon.co.uk/index.html Website updated 6 June 2004 |
London Orbital (M25) - Service Areas
"Annabel Smyth" wrote in message ... On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 at 06:47:09, Robin Cox wrote: There is a picnic area at Heston (M4) Eastbound. There is also a current planning application to build 120 units of affordable housing on it - which makes me think that not many people picnic there. Yes, but there are picnic areas at a good many other service areas - that's not special. The point is, why not have just picnic/rest areas? Why do we need, every single time, a petrol station/restaurant/expensive shop? Obviously we do need those, but *every* rest area? Given that, from what I've seen, the UK services aren't very frequent/close together, having alternate service provision could be somewhat annoying. eg M40 has, as I recall, 2 sets of services, Junction 8 and another up near warwick... not exactly that close, and enough to make a difference that if you didn't know the later services had been converted to remove its petrol station you could end up running out before reaching the next on the M6/M5/ birmingham. Also, as previously mentioned, the M25 is somewhat lacking with only 3 sets of services. Or are you propsing these picnic areas in addition to existing services rather than removing petrol/other facilities from every other service area. |
London Orbital (M25) - Service Areas
In message , Annabel Smyth
writes There is also a current planning application to build 120 units of affordable housing on it I presume that means affordable to Londoners on London allowance, but our of reach to the rest of the country. -- Clive |
London Orbital (M25) - Service Areas
"Annabel Smyth" wrote in message
... Yes, but there are picnic areas at a good many other service areas - that's not special. The point is, why not have just picnic/rest areas? Why do we need, every single time, a petrol station/restaurant/expensive shop? Obviously we do need those, but *every* rest area? Why would anyone want to picnic next to a motorway [1]? Wouldn't pulling off at a junction and finding a quiet spot be more to most people's taste? [1] Except the M45, where you could safely and happily enjoy a picnic on the fast lane. -- John Rowland - Spamtrapped Transport Plans for the London Area, updated 2001 http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Acro...69/tpftla.html A man's vehicle is a symbol of his manhood. That's why my vehicle's the Piccadilly Line - It's the size of a county and it comes every two and a half minutes |
London Orbital (M25) - Service Areas
"Henry" wrote:
"Ian Jelf" wrote [1] You're right to say that it was once called "Farthing Corner". [2] I'm not sure when, though. Does anyone know? The name Farthing Corner was in use when it was under construction about 1962. Don't know how long the name lasted, but that is what I still think of it as. It was still in use as late as the late 80s or early 90s. -- James Farrar | London, SE13 | |
London Orbital (M25) - Service Areas
In message , John Rowland
writes "Annabel Smyth" wrote in message ... Yes, but there are picnic areas at a good many other service areas - that's not special. The point is, why not have just picnic/rest areas? Why do we need, every single time, a petrol station/restaurant/expensive shop? Obviously we do need those, but *every* rest area? Why would anyone want to picnic next to a motorway [1]? Wouldn't pulling off at a junction and finding a quiet spot be more to most people's taste? But "finding a quiet spot" where it's allowed is remarkably difficult, even in much of rural Britain....... [1] Except the M45, where you could safely and happily enjoy a picnic on the fast lane. You'd noticed....... :-) -- Ian Jelf, MITG, Birmingham, UK Registered "Blue Badge" Tourist Guide for London & the Heart of England http://www.bluebadge.demon.co.uk |
London Orbital (M25) - Service Areas
In article , Matt
Wheeler writes eg M40 has, as I recall, 2 sets of services, Junction 8 and another up near warwick... Oxford (J8) Cherwell Valley (just south of Banbury) Warwick. -- Andrew Electronic communications can be altered and therefore the integrity of this communication can not be guaranteed. Views expressed in this communication are those of the author and not associations or companies I am involved with. |
London Orbital (M25) - Service Areas
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 06:53:47 GMT, "Robin Cox"
wrote: And if so, why did they change the name? Probably a marketing thing. They renamed Forton to Lancaster, and Burton-in-Kendal to plain "Kendal", and it caused so much confusion that they had to change them back - or at least label the former "Lancaster (Forton)" and do something similar with the other one. Given that people leave the motorway at junctions, and don't tend to do so at services (unless they know of the sneaky back way out, and I realise there are a few) it makes no sense to rename them, as people tend to know the names already and just get confused when they change. It doesn't matter if you know where Forton is or not, for example - that's just the name for the service area. On a slight aside, Tebay (say it out loud and think about what you might get from the cafe there) always struck me as a brilliant name for a service station - and, being an independent station, is one of the best I've been to. I'll get my coat... Neil -- Neil Williams in Milton Keynes, UK To e-mail use neil at the above domain |
London Orbital (M25) - Service Areas
On Mon, 28 Jun 2004 09:26:38 +0100, Ian Jelf
wrote: In fact, in France at least, the proportion of these to "full blown" service areas is much greater, maybe four or five to one. Indeed, large scale service areas are actually few and far between in France; I know as I frequently used to have to find the blasted places to keep groups of 49 people on British coaches happy! MX is that the French "proper" services generally aren't up to the same standard as most of the British ones are these days, either. A few aires de repos would be nice if you just need a quick trip to the toilet, but I think overall I'd rather have more full-blown services. I doubt, given the typical British abuse of such facilities, that an unmanned aire de repos like the French ones would avoid vandalism, particularly of the toilets. Could even end up being a gypsy camp if not patrolled properly. Neil -- Neil Williams in Milton Keynes, UK To e-mail use neil at the above domain |
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:26 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk