TfL Vision of the Future map
TfL have unveiled a "future of transport" map which shows how the
Underground map (or rather "TfL map") would look in 2016 if they get funding for the projects they want to build. Some particular National Rail lines are included on the map as well as Crossrail 1, Thameslink 2000, the ELLX, Cross River Transit, DLR extensions, East London Transit, Greenwich Waterfront Transit, the West London Tram, the Croydon Tramlink extensions, the Croxley Link, Terminal 5 and Stratford International. It's very interesting! http://www.thisislocallondon.co.uk/_...nsport_map.pdf -- Dave Arquati Imperial College, SW7 www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London |
TfL Vision of the Future map
It's very interesting! http://www.thisislocallondon.co.uk/_...nsport_map.pdf -- Dave Arquati Imperial College, SW7 www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London I can get that file. Is there a link to the story with the map? |
TfL Vision of the Future map
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004 at 17:37:55, Dave Arquati wrote:
TfL have unveiled a "future of transport" map which shows how the Underground map (or rather "TfL map") would look in 2016 if they get funding for the projects they want to build. Some particular National Rail lines are included on the map as well as Crossrail 1, Thameslink 2000, the ELLX, Cross River Transit, DLR extensions, East London Transit, Greenwich Waterfront Transit, the West London Tram, the Croydon Tramlink extensions, the Croxley Link, Terminal 5 and Stratford International. It's very interesting! http://www.thisislocallondon.co.uk/_...nsport_map.pdf It's fascinating - but an awful lack of joined-up thinking from my point of view - why on earth can't they extend the proposed Cross River Transit from Brixton to Streatham, there to join up with the extended Croydon Tramlink? Since the buses have got much better, it's easier than it used to be to get a southbound bus from Brixton at this time of night (6.00 pm), but it's still common to have to wait, and it isn't pleasant! Much easier to be able to get down to Streatham, or possibly just as far as Herne Hill to join Thameslink services to Streatham..... -- Annabel Smyth http://www.amsmyth.demon.co.uk/index.html Website updated 6 June 2004 |
TfL Vision of the Future map
On Tue, 06 Jul 2004 17:37:55 +0100, Dave Arquati wrote:
TfL have unveiled a "future of transport" map which shows how the Underground map (or rather "TfL map") would look in 2016 if they get funding for the projects they want to build. Anyone know the exact location for the "Stratford International for the Olympics" station? I was in that area this weekend, having a look round. |
TfL Vision of the Future map
On Tue, 06 Jul 2004 17:37:55 +0100, Dave Arquati
wrote: TfL have unveiled a "future of transport" map which shows how the Underground map (or rather "TfL map") would look in 2016 if they get funding for the projects they want to build. SNIP It's very interesting! http://www.thisislocallondon.co.uk/_...nsport_map.pdf Doesn't show the Centralle tram stop in Croydon !!! :-( PRAR -- http://www.i.am/prar/ As long as people will accept crap, it will be financially profitable to dispense it. Dick Cavett Please reply to the newsgroup. That is why it exists. NB Anti-spam measures in force - If you must email me use the Reply to address and not |
TfL Vision of the Future map
In article ,
Dave Arquati wrote: TfL have unveiled a "future of transport" map which shows how the Underground map (or rather "TfL map") would look in 2016 if they get funding for the projects they want to build. Some particular National Rail lines are included on the map as well as Crossrail 1, Thameslink 2000, the ELLX, Cross River Transit, DLR extensions, East London Transit, Greenwich Waterfront Transit, the West London Tram, the Croydon Tramlink extensions, the Croxley Link, Terminal 5 and Stratford International. No Chelsea-Hackney line though. -- http://www.election.demon.co.uk "The guilty party was the Liberal Democrats and they were hardened offenders, and coded racism was again in evidence in leaflets distributed in September 1993." - Nigel Copsey, "Contemporary British Fascism", page 62. |
TfL Vision of the Future map
TfL have unveiled a "future of transport" map which shows how the
Underground map (or rather "TfL map") would look in 2016 if they get funding for the projects they want to build. Some particular National Rail lines are included on the map as well as Crossrail 1, Thameslink 2000, the ELLX, Cross River Transit, DLR extensions, East London Transit, Greenwich Waterfront Transit, the West London Tram, the Croydon Tramlink extensions, the Croxley Link, Terminal 5 and Stratford International. It's very interesting! http://www.thisislocallondon.co.uk/_...nsport_map.pdf TfL are obviously not interested in bringing the Bakerloos back to Watford Junction! Burkey |
TfL Vision of the Future map
Dave Arquati wrote:
http://www.thisislocallondon.co.uk/_...nsport_map.pdf Grr. I hate PDF files, they are a complete and utter waste of time and money. Ban them, I say! -- To reply direct, remove NOSPAM and replace with railwaysonline For railway information, news and photos see http://www.railways-online.co.uk |
TfL Vision of the Future map
JB wrote:
It's very interesting! http://www.thisislocallondon.co.uk/_...nsport_map.pdf -- Dave Arquati Imperial College, SW7 www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London I can get that file. Is there a link to the story with the map? http://makeashorterlink.com/?D2C912CB8 I have now noticed a few oddities: * East London Line northern extension goes to Caledonian Rd & Barnsbury - I know they are planning a reversing siding near there but I didn't think they'd run services the extra stop. * I wasn't aware that Farringdon Crossrail would have two exits (one at Barbican) but that might just be me. * They've left the Moorgate Thameslink branch on there (as well as Shoreditch on the ELL) which might be misleading. * I thought the Crystal Palace Tramlink branch was from the Streatham branch, not the Beckenham Jcn one. -- Dave Arquati Imperial College, SW7 www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London |
TfL Vision of the Future map
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004, Dave Arquati wrote:
http://www.thisislocallondon.co.uk/_...nsport_map.pdf You have to love the acrobatic station markers at Farringdon/Barbican and Liverpool Street/Moorgate. -- Michael Hoffman |
TfL Vision of the Future map
Joe wrote:
Dave Arquati wrote: http://www.thisislocallondon.co.uk/_...nsport_map.pdf Grr. I hate PDF files, they are a complete and utter waste of time and money. Ban them, I say! How else would you display via the web a large, complex map with the ability to zoom in to look at areas in detail? Maybe you need a faster PC. I too used to grumble about the time taken to load Acrobat Reader until I replaced my 5-year-old PC last year. -- Richard J. (to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address) |
TfL Vision of the Future map
Richard J. wrote:
Maybe you need a faster PC. I bought a new computer in September and it works fine, howver I still havent been able to get into this "Map" because it is a PDF file, which are all complate wastes of time. A Gif would be a much better solution with a Bmp for those who want good quality. -- To reply direct, remove NOSPAM and replace with railwaysonline For railway information, news and photos see http://www.railways-online.co.uk |
TfL Vision of the Future map
Joe wrote:
Richard J. wrote: Maybe you need a faster PC. I bought a new computer in September and it works fine, howver I still havent been able to get into this "Map" because it is a PDF file, Get Acrobat Reader plugged into your browser then, unless you are using an odd browser that it doesn't interface with. (This is getting off-topic -- mail me if you want to pursue this.) -- Richard J. (to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address) |
TfL Vision of the Future map
Dave Arquati wrote:
JB wrote: It's very interesting! http://www.thisislocallondon.co.uk/_...nsport_map.pdf I can get that file. Is there a link to the story with the map? http://makeashorterlink.com/?D2C912CB8 I have now noticed a few oddities: * East London Line northern extension goes to Caledonian Rd & Barnsbury - I know they are planning a reversing siding near there but I didn't think they'd run services the extra stop. * I wasn't aware that Farringdon Crossrail would have two exits (one at Barbican) but that might just be me. All the Central London stations on Crossrail will have two exits. Only at Farringdon (Barbican) and Liverpool Street (Moorgate) do both ends link to Tube stations. * They've left the Moorgate Thameslink branch on there (as well as Shoreditch on the ELL) which might be misleading. The map doesn't have a way of indicating that an existing line will close by 2016. Another example is Turnham Green to Richmond: the District service will cease if/when Crossrail starts running. * I thought the Crystal Palace Tramlink branch was from the Streatham branch, not the Beckenham Jcn one. Also: * No interchange shown between Isle of Dogs (Crossrail) and West India Quay (DLR) despite the former being below the latter. * No White City station on the Hammersmith & City. I thought this was planned to be reinstated to serve the shopping complex. * No apostrophes in Earls Court, Regents Park, Kings Cross, etc! Is this one of the plans for 2016? :-) -- Richard J. (to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address) |
TfL Vision of the Future map
David Boothroyd wrote:
In article , Dave Arquati wrote: TfL have unveiled a "future of transport" map which shows how the Underground map (or rather "TfL map") would look in 2016 if they get funding for the projects they want to build. Some particular National Rail lines are included on the map as well as Crossrail 1, Thameslink 2000, the ELLX, Cross River Transit, DLR extensions, East London Transit, Greenwich Waterfront Transit, the West London Tram, the Croydon Tramlink extensions, the Croxley Link, Terminal 5 and Stratford International. No Chelsea-Hackney line though. Completion is predicted for 2016 *at the earliest* if it were taken ahead with Crossrail 1; if Crossrail 1 gets funding next week in the Spending Review then it will have taken decades to get it and I don't see anyone splashing out on Crossrail 2 within the same decade. -- Dave Arquati Imperial College, SW7 www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London |
TfL Vision of the Future map
"Michael Hoffman" wrote in message news:Pine.WNT.4.58.0407062019010.3224@ZVAVZBB... You have to love the acrobatic station markers at Farringdon/Barbican and Liverpool Street/Moorgate. Don't quite know what's going on at Barbican and Farringdon, but the plans for Liverpool Street Crossrail show escalators linking to both Liverpool Street and Moorgate Underground stations. ISTR the main Crossrail ticket hall being under the new office block being built on the corner of Moorfields / London Wall, which is just south of Moorgate station. |
TfL Vision of the Future map
"JWBA68" wrote in message ... TfL have unveiled a "future of transport" map which shows how the Underground map (or rather "TfL map") would look in 2016 if they get funding for the projects they want to build. Some particular National Rail lines are included on the map as well as Crossrail 1, Thameslink 2000, the ELLX, Cross River Transit, DLR extensions, East London Transit, Greenwich Waterfront Transit, the West London Tram, the Croydon Tramlink extensions, the Croxley Link, Terminal 5 and Stratford International. It's very interesting! http://www.thisislocallondon.co.uk/_...nsport_map.pdf TfL are obviously not interested in bringing the Bakerloos back to Watford Junction! Burkey Don't know how you figure that - the map clearly shows Silverlink Metro going to Watford Junction. The Bakerloo still stops at Harrow & Wealdstone. I'm guessing they included Silverlink as it indicates the new interchange opportunity at Watford Junction. Also it does provide a 'metro' service to Headstone Lane & Hatch End which are both within Greater London. Colin |
TfL Vision of the Future map
On Tue, 06 Jul 2004 21:02:22 +0100, Joe
wrote: Richard J. wrote: Maybe you need a faster PC. I bought a new computer in September and it works fine, howver I still havent been able to get into this "Map" because it is a PDF file, which are all complate wastes of time. A Gif would be a much better solution with a Bmp for those who want good quality. The pdf map is a vector graphic - much better for scaling and zooming than any bitmap. I do have a thing against people who put bitmaps in pdfs or create them with out actually checking if they work properly, but done well pdfs are a very portable format. Also try selcting the text off a bitmap and see where it gets you. PRAR -- http://www.i.am/prar/ As long as people will accept crap, it will be financially profitable to dispense it. Dick Cavett Please reply to the newsgroup. That is why it exists. NB Anti-spam measures in force - If you must email me use the Reply to address and not |
TfL Vision of the Future map
"Dave Arquati" wrote in message ... JB wrote: It's very interesting! http://www.thisislocallondon.co.uk/_...nsport_map.pdf -- Dave Arquati Imperial College, SW7 www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London I can get that file. Is there a link to the story with the map? http://makeashorterlink.com/?D2C912CB8 I have now noticed a few oddities: * East London Line northern extension goes to Caledonian Rd & Barnsbury - I know they are planning a reversing siding near there but I didn't think they'd run services the extra stop. * I wasn't aware that Farringdon Crossrail would have two exits (one at Barbican) but that might just be me. It isn't that far - I can well believe that a 12 car platform would stretch all the way between Farringdon & Barbican (think of City Thameslink and how far apart the Ludgate Hill & Holborn Viaduct exits are). Farringdon was going to get a new entrance building for Thameslink 2000 anyway, so maybe it'll also cope with the Crossrail entrance. * They've left the Moorgate Thameslink branch on there (as well as Shoreditch on the ELL) which might be misleading. And Watford (Met). I think they are more keen to enthuse people about new services than point out that current ones may be withdrawn, thus causing protests. Just look at the upset that has been caused by the fact that Richmond will lose its beloved District line to make way for Crossrail! Colin |
TfL Vision of the Future map
"Dave Arquati" wrote in message ... JB wrote: It's very interesting! http://www.thisislocallondon.co.uk/_...nsport_map.pdf -- Dave Arquati Imperial College, SW7 www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London I can get that file. Is there a link to the story with the map? http://makeashorterlink.com/?D2C912CB8 That's done it - thanks. |
TfL Vision of the Future map
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004, Robin Mayes wrote:
Don't quite know what's going on at Barbican and Farringdon, but the plans for Liverpool Street Crossrail show escalators linking to both Liverpool Street and Moorgate Underground stations. I remember reading that in order to handle the passenger load of a Crosstrail train which will hold more than SSL trains, the stations will have two ways out at either end of the platform. In some cases (Farringdon, Liverpool Street) this will mean connecting to two LU stations. -- Michael Hoffman |
TfL Vision of the Future map
"Robin Mayes" wrote:
"Michael Hoffman" wrote in message news:Pine.WNT.4.58.0407062019010.3224@ZVAVZBB.. . You have to love the acrobatic station markers at Farringdon/Barbican and Liverpool Street/Moorgate. Don't quite know what's going on at Barbican and Farringdon, but the plans for Liverpool Street Crossrail show escalators linking to both Liverpool Street and Moorgate Underground stations. ISTR the main Crossrail ticket hall being under the new office block being built on the corner of Moorfields / London Wall, which is just south of Moorgate station. Moorhouse. Yes, there is at least one poster on the external hoarding mentioning the void that's been left underground for the Crossrail ticket hall. -- James Farrar | London, SE13 | |
TfL Vision of the Future map
Don't know how you figure that - the map clearly shows Silverlink Metro
going to Watford Junction. The Bakerloo still stops at Harrow & Wealdstone. I'm guessing they included Silverlink as it indicates the new interchange opportunity at Watford Junction. Also it does provide a 'metro' service to Headstone Lane & Hatch End which are both within Greater London. It only shows the Bakerloos going as far as Harrow & Wealdstone! Headstone Lane & Hatch End would have to have a 10 minute service all day every day to be deemed a proper 'metro' service. Burkey |
TfL Vision of the Future map
"Dave Arquati" wrote in message
... It's very interesting! http://www.thisislocallondon.co.uk/_...nsport_map.pdf Thanks! The omissions are more interesting. Park Royal interchange West Hampstead Met Interchange Tufnell Park Goblin interchange (no surprise) Langdon Park DLR station - whatever happened to that? New H&C station at White City Anyway, Tramlink seems to be track-sharing with Thameslink trains between Sutton and Wimbledon! Will HSE be up for that? -- John Rowland - Spamtrapped Transport Plans for the London Area, updated 2001 http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Acro...69/tpftla.html A man's vehicle is a symbol of his manhood. That's why my vehicle's the Piccadilly Line - It's the size of a county and it comes every two and a half minutes |
TfL Vision of the Future map
"JWBA68" wrote in message ... Don't know how you figure that - the map clearly shows Silverlink Metro going to Watford Junction. The Bakerloo still stops at Harrow & Wealdstone. I'm guessing they included Silverlink as it indicates the new interchange opportunity at Watford Junction. Also it does provide a 'metro' service to Headstone Lane & Hatch End which are both within Greater London. It only shows the Bakerloos going as far as Harrow & Wealdstone! That is what I said! Headstone Lane & Hatch End would have to have a 10 minute service all day every day to be deemed a proper 'metro' service. TfL seem to classify '4 an hour' as a 'Metro' service, as seen at several stations on the 'Overground Network' south of the river. Burkey |
TfL Vision of the Future map
John Rowland wrote:
"Dave Arquati" wrote... It's very interesting! http://www.thisislocallondon.co.uk/_...nsport_map.pdf Thanks! The omissions are more interesting. Park Royal interchange West Hampstead Met Interchange Tufnell Park Goblin interchange (no surprise) Langdon Park DLR station - whatever happened to that? New H&C station at White City Anyway, Tramlink seems to be track-sharing with Thameslink trains between Sutton and Wimbledon! Will HSE be up for that? Possibly if both were modified, but persuading them would be more trouble than it's worth. Besides, wasn't that idea abandoned in favour of a more direct street alignment for Tramlink? |
TfL Vision of the Future map
Annabel Smyth wrote:
It's fascinating - but an awful lack of joined-up thinking from my point of view - why on earth can't they extend the proposed Cross River Transit from Brixton to Streatham, there to join up with the extended Croydon Tramlink? Since the buses have got much better, it's easier than it used to be to get a southbound bus from Brixton at this time of night (6.00 pm), but it's still common to have to wait, and it isn't pleasant! Much easier to be able to get down to Streatham, or possibly just as far as Herne Hill to join Thameslink services to Streatham..... I don't want to sound like a partial whinger, but it just looks like yet more options to everyone but those in South London to me. Perhaps I'm just paranoid, but I really fail to see the point of a transport link to Purley. IMO. And yes, a reliable link to Brixton would be much nicer. I know about the corridor through Streatham particularly around the library that makes it difficult, but either just sod the cars or bulldoze Lidl imo. Either way it's win:win ;) |
TfL Vision of the Future map
On Wed, 7 Jul 2004 00:25:14 +0100, "John Rowland"
wrote: "Dave Arquati" wrote in message ... It's very interesting! http://www.thisislocallondon.co.uk/_...nsport_map.pdf Thanks! The omissions are more interesting. Park Royal interchange West Hampstead Met Interchange Tufnell Park Goblin interchange (no surprise) Langdon Park DLR station - whatever happened to that? New H&C station at White City One might ask, what's happened to the CRT link to King's Cross and north thereof? Regards, Clive -- Clive R Robertson -- AS/400 Programmer. Webmaster of http://www.osterleypark.org.uk/ -- this describes a beautiful National Trust property in West London. |
TfL Vision of the Future map
On Tue, 06 Jul 2004 21:02:22 +0100, Joe
wrote: I bought a new computer in September and it works fine, howver I still havent been able to get into this "Map" because it is a PDF file, which are all complate wastes of time. A Gif would be a much better solution with a Bmp for those who want good quality. (OT) Erm, no. A GIF with a correct palette would give just as much quality as a BMP for this sort of image (GIF is non-lossy compression, remember - it's just limited to 8-bit colour). It's JPEG that would degrade the quality. PDF is very useful for this sort of image because you can zoom in and out and have the image rerendered for you. Even on my rather elderly PC here, it loaded fine. Perhaps you need to do some fixing? Sam -- Sam Holloway, Cambridge |
TfL Vision of the Future map
On Tue, 06 Jul 2004 20:17:43 GMT, "Richard J."
wrote: about http://www.thisislocallondon.co.uk/_...nsport_map.pdf Fascinating stuff, and quite an impressive piece of design, too. Thanks, Dave, for pointing this out to us! * No interchange shown between Isle of Dogs (Crossrail) and West India Quay (DLR) despite the former being below the latter. But then, the Isle of Dogs Crossrail station is diagramatically position away from the Isle of Dogs. :-) The geography appears to be quite twisted here. * No White City station on the Hammersmith & City. I thought this was planned to be reinstated to serve the shopping complex. There seemed to be few changes to the UndergrounD lines in general : Metropolitan proposals at Croxley/Watford, Heathrow T5 on the Piccadilly, and East London extensions, but that's it. Any mooted plans to extend Victoria or Bakerloo lines south must be pretty dormant. * No apostrophes in Earls Court, Regents Park, Kings Cross, etc! Is this one of the plans for 2016? :-) Quite possibly! Apostrophe abuse is so common now that getting rid of them altogether could be the way forward. :-) (Personally it feels more wrong to see an apostrophe where there shouldn't be one than to see one omitted...) Sam -- Sam Holloway, Cambridge |
TfL Vision of the Future map
"JWBA68" wrote in message ... TfL have unveiled a "future of transport" map which shows how the Underground map (or rather "TfL map") would look in 2016 if they get funding for the projects they want to build. Some particular National Rail lines are included on the map as well as Crossrail 1, Thameslink 2000, the ELLX, Cross River Transit, DLR extensions, East London Transit, Greenwich Waterfront Transit, the West London Tram, the Croydon Tramlink extensions, the Croxley Link, Terminal 5 and Stratford International. It's very interesting! http://www.thisislocallondon.co.uk/_...nsport_map.pdf TfL are obviously not interested in bringing the Bakerloos back to Watford Junction! They haven't said they have, have they? 4tph isn't great, admittedly; but there are areas that have far worse service that should be prioritized. Especially since the Bakerloo's already jampacked. Jonn |
TfL Vision of the Future map
On Wed, 07 Jul 2004 10:56:48 +0100, Sam Holloway
wrote: There seemed to be few changes to the UndergrounD lines in general : Metropolitan proposals at Croxley/Watford, Heathrow T5 on the Piccadilly, and East London extensions, but that's it. Any mooted plans to extend Victoria or Bakerloo lines south must be pretty dormant. There was some talk about eliminating Kew Gardens and Richmond from the District Line, to be replaced by Crossrail. The PDF map shows them both in place. Does this mean that the District Line will be preserved intact, or is this still under review? Also, why doesn't the Kingston branch of Crossrail end at Norbiton? It is in Crossrail's own planning documents, and would bring people right to Kingston Hospital. |
TfL Vision of the Future map
Marc Brett wrote:
There was some talk about eliminating Kew Gardens and Richmond from the District Line, to be replaced by Crossrail. The PDF map shows them both in place. Does this mean that the District Line will be preserved intact, or is this still under review? As I pointed out in an earlier post, the map doesn't have a way of indicating existing lines that would be closed. The current Crossrail plan removes District services on the Richmond branch. Also, why doesn't the Kingston branch of Crossrail end at Norbiton? It is in Crossrail's own planning documents, and would bring people right to Kingston Hospital. It was in Crossrail's original proposal for this branch in order to provide reversing facilities. The current plan (dating from September 2003 IIRC) has 8tph terminating at Richmond, and Crossrail's view is that Kingston can cope with the remaining 4tph. -- Richard J. (to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address) |
TfL Vision of the Future map
On Wed, 7 Jul 2004 at 08:40:56, Dan Gravell
wrote: And yes, a reliable link to Brixton would be much nicer. I know about the corridor through Streatham particularly around the library that makes it difficult, but either just sod the cars or bulldoze Lidl imo. Either way it's win:win ;) Why can't they go down Tooting Bec Common, if they can't go down the High Road? (No, I don't want them to bulldoze Lidl; I like Lidl!) -- Annabel Smyth http://www.amsmyth.demon.co.uk/index.html Website updated 6 June 2004 |
TfL Vision of the Future map
On Tue, 06 Jul 2004 19:37:26 +0100, Joe
wrote: Dave Arquati wrote: http://www.thisislocallondon.co.uk/_...nsport_map.pdf Grr. I hate PDF files, they are a complete and utter waste of time and money. Ban them, I say! Especially seeing as Adobe Reader 6.0 is so expensive! ;-) Cheers, Jason. |
TfL Vision of the Future map
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004 at 17:37:55, Dave Arquati wrote:
TfL have unveiled a "future of transport" map which shows how the Underground map (or rather "TfL map") would look in 2016 if they get funding for the projects they want to build. One thing that pleases me is that Waterloo and King's Cross/St Pancras are *both* marked as Eurostar stations - I was afraid that Waterloo International would close when the new terminus at St Pancras opens. -- Annabel Smyth http://www.amsmyth.demon.co.uk/index.html Website updated 6 June 2004 |
TfL Vision of the Future map
In article , Annabel Smyth wrote:
One thing that pleases me is that Waterloo and King's Cross/St Pancras are *both* marked as Eurostar stations - I was afraid that Waterloo International would close when the new terminus at St Pancras opens. They might simply be hedging because they don't know which will be the case. :-) Niklas -- "I want to live in Theory. Everything works in Theory." -- Robert Sneddon |
Extending the Bakerloo and Victoria lines south TfL Vision ofthe Future map
On Wed, 7 Jul 2004, Sam Holloway wrote:
Any mooted plans to extend Victoria or Bakerloo lines south must be pretty dormant. I've heard mention of such plans, but no details (at least not for the Victoria). What exactly has been proposed (seriously or not)? tom -- It is especially delicious (haha) and tacky at the same time when they stick a strawberry on two toothpicks in a weird imitation of Christ for no particular reason and give it to you with your drink. -- jisms |
TfL Vision of the Future map
are all complate wastes of time. A Gif would be a much better solution
with a Bmp for those who want good quality. Huh? A GIF is a compressed bitmap without loss. Why suffer through a much larger file unnecessarily? |
TfL Vision of the Future map
Except it wouldn't, because then you run into licensing and patent
issues...Which is why most people are switching away from GIFs to JPEGs and PNGs...Apart from anything else, PDFs tend to scale and print a lot There's no such issue with GIF any longer. The LZW patent (one of the compression technologies found in GIF) expired within the last year or so. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:20 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk