Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 20 Jul 2004 20:05:34 +0100, Dave Arquati
wrote: Tom Anderson wrote: No mention of Crossrail 2, i take it ... Nope - I don't think even CLRL realistically believe this will happen anytime soon. The main reason the SRA support the Kingston branch is for relief to Waterloo, so I don't think they believe it will happen either. It's hard enough to build Crossrail 1 (and Thameslink 2000). So what *was* mentioned on Thameslink 2000? Sam -- Sam Holloway, Cambridge |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Crossrail to go ahead | London Transport | |||
F&*&%^& toilets | London Transport | |||
Thameslink project (i.e. TL2K) gets legal & planning go-ahead | London Transport | |||
A different ELLX question | London Transport | |||
Surrey Canal Road ELLX station idea | London Transport |