Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Joe wrote in message ...
Chris Brady wrote: P.S. And FGWL Customer Services are also appalling in that they NEVER respond to letters, emails or faxes of concern. BRING BACK THAMES at least they tried. FirstGroup - ******s they may be - shine like brilliant beacons of success compared to Thames Trains. Dont have that much experience of the GWML I admit however I do know that yes FGW is outstanding but FGWL is a differnt type of operation. Just because First run a good INTERCITY service does not default to a good inner and outer suburban service. Always the problem no matter where you look these days that on a weekend a solitary DMU is not enough. TPX, Virgin (lets not go there!), FNW (whatever it is now). Whenever I have travelled on the above companies a single DMU is not sufficient. But this is without previous cancellations I refer to. Anyway feel I am digressing. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
CIG_BIG_CIG wrote:
Dont have that much experience of the GWML I admit however I do know that yes FGW is outstanding but FGWL is a differnt type of operation. Just because First run a good INTERCITY service does not default to a good inner and outer suburban service. I was actually referring to the ****-poor service that Thames Trains operated, based on what I have seen compared to the service (might be bad, bur better than TT) that 1st currently operate. -- To reply direct, remove NOSPAM and replace with railwaysonline For railway information, news and photos see http://www.railwaysonline.co.uk |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Joe wrote in message ...
CIG_BIG_CIG wrote: Dont have that much experience of the GWML I admit however I do know that yes FGW is outstanding but FGWL is a differnt type of operation. Just because First run a good INTERCITY service does not default to a good inner and outer suburban service. I was actually referring to the ****-poor service that Thames Trains operated, based on what I have seen compared to the service (might be bad, bur better than TT) that 1st currently operate. This may be true for the stoping services, but as an Oxford resident, I can vouch for the fact that since the transfer from TT to FGWL, the Oxford-London fast services have gone severely downhill. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"CIG_BIG_CIG" wrote in message
om... Joe wrote in message ... Chris Brady wrote: P.S. And FGWL Customer Services are also appalling in that they NEVER respond to letters, emails or faxes of concern. BRING BACK THAMES at least they tried. FirstGroup - ******s they may be - shine like brilliant beacons of success compared to Thames Trains. Dont have that much experience of the GWML I admit however I do know that yes FGW is outstanding but FGWL is a differnt type of operation. Just because First run a good INTERCITY service does not default to a good inner and outer suburban service. They ran a great inner suburban service on the Great Eastern line to Shenfield. Then they gave the franchise to National Express. Jonn |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
First Great Western Equipment Question | London Transport | |||
There are now more blacks in England than in some African countries,many of which are far larger than the UK. | London Transport | |||
There are now more blacks in England than in some African countries,many of which are far larger than the UK. | London Transport | |||
Chiltern and Virgin on Great Western. | London Transport | |||
FGW Link excels even Thames Strains at public safety (lack of ...) | London Transport |