Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Whatever happened to the extension south of E&C? and where was it gonna be
extended to? You can see it here on this old tube map http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.d...ayphotohosting |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Bored Of The
Rings writes Whatever happened to the extension south of E&C? The 1949 plan shown on the map was abandoned because of cost (before the war a similar plan had been curtailed to just a 515-foot siding beyond Elephant). and where was it gonna be extended to? In that particular incarnation, Camberwell (Green). For more detail, see the History section of: http://www.davros.org/rail/culg/bakerloo.html -- Paul Terry |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul Terry wrote in message ...
In message , Bored Of The Rings writes Whatever happened to the extension south of E&C? The 1949 plan shown on the map was abandoned because of cost (before the war a similar plan had been curtailed to just a 515-foot siding beyond Elephant). and where was it gonna be extended to? In that particular incarnation, Camberwell (Green). For more detail, see the History section of: http://www.davros.org/rail/culg/bakerloo.html Later, as http://www.addington3.freeserve.co.uk/tranmon3.html explains, the JLE proposal was originally a BLE proposal. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul Terry wrote in message ...
In message , Bored Of The Rings writes Whatever happened to the extension south of E&C? The 1949 plan shown on the map was abandoned because of cost (before the war a similar plan had been curtailed to just a 515-foot siding beyond Elephant). and where was it gonna be extended to? In that particular incarnation, Camberwell (Green). For more detail, see the History section of: http://www.davros.org/rail/culg/bakerloo.html ISTR hearing a long time ago that there were murmurings of this proposal staging Yet Another Comeback. Personally I think it will never see the light of day, unless Kenny L can find the cash in his 3bilGBP TfL package. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
TheOneKEA wrote:
Paul Terry wrote in message ... In message , Bored Of The Rings writes Whatever happened to the extension south of E&C? The 1949 plan shown on the map was abandoned because of cost (before the war a similar plan had been curtailed to just a 515-foot siding beyond Elephant). and where was it gonna be extended to? In that particular incarnation, Camberwell (Green). For more detail, see the History section of: http://www.davros.org/rail/culg/bakerloo.html ISTR hearing a long time ago that there were murmurings of this proposal staging Yet Another Comeback. Personally I think it will never see the light of day, unless Kenny L can find the cash in his 3bilGBP TfL package. Certainly little likelihood at the moment at Cross River Transit covers a significant proportion of Walworth and Peckham (although not Camberwell). http://www.alwaystouchout.com/project/2 Transport plans for Walworth Road and Camberwell include re-opening the former stations there, on the Thameslink service to Sutton/Wimbledon. Those plans are very sketchy though. http://www.alwaystouchout.com/project/57 -- Dave Arquati Imperial College, SW7 www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bored Of The Rings" wrote in message ...
Whatever happened to the extension south of E&C? and where was it gonna be extended to? You can see it here on this old tube map http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.d...ayphotohosting The map is quite interesing, in a couple of ways. It shows the proposed Northern Line extension from Finsbury Park to Alexandra Palace (via Highgate HL), but not the section from Mill Hill East to Bushey Heath (via Edgware). I hadn't realised that abandonment of these schemes wasn't simultaneous. Also, the roundel on the front uses the word 'Railways', rather than 'Underground' - when, and for how long, was this practice current? |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Chippy
writes Also, the roundel on the front uses the word 'Railways', rather than 'Underground' - when, and for how long, was this practice current? 1948 to 1956 inclusive, according to the lists in Anne Letch's catalogue of LT maps. -- Paul Terry |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nick Cooper wrote to uk.transport.london on Mon, 1 Nov 2004:
I'd hate to see what the in-car track diagram would look like, though! Presumably they'd do as they do on the District/Circle lines and have some and some, according to which destination the particular train normally served. -- "Mrs Redboots" http://www.amsmyth.demon.co.uk/ Website updated 31 October 2004 |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Bakerloo Line Extension | London Transport | |||
Signage for Bakerloo southern extension | London Transport | |||
Piccadilly line extension to Terminal 5/Heathrow Express extension to T5 | London Transport |