Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
The London commuter market - BR's last safe haven?
Michael Bell wrote:
In the days when railway traffic was declining fast, and it seemed that railways might close altogether, Can't say I ever thought that was likely. What period did you have in mind? I got the impression that BR developed its London commuter market because whatever the economics, for political reasons that network could never be shut down. Too many votes depended on it. Can anybody confirm this? In what sense did BR "develop" the London commuter market? If you mean things like the Shenfield electrification, that was largely the renewal of worn-out infrastructure and trains by up-to-date technology. Such investment was certainly not confined to the London commuter market. -- Richard J. (to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
The London commuter market - BR's last safe haven?
In article , Richard J.
wrote: Michael Bell wrote: In the days when railway traffic was declining fast, and it seemed that railways might close altogether, Can't say I ever thought that was likely. What period did you have in mind? I got the impression that BR developed its London commuter market because whatever the economics, for political reasons that network could never be shut down. Too many votes depended on it. Can anybody confirm this? In what sense did BR "develop" the London commuter market? If you mean things like the Shenfield electrification, that was largely the renewal of worn-out infrastructure and trains by up-to-date technology. Such investment was certainly not confined to the London commuter market. I am thinking of the period after Beeching, when it seemed that closures would carry on til nothing was left. But Beeching himself had said that commuter railways could always be made to pay if you raised the fares high enough, and it seemed to me that the view in BR HQ after Beeching had left was that profit may no longer be the objective, but political forces would keep these routes open, so other business was neglected and effort put into the commuter market. That was the impression I had at the time. That's hardly the situation today of course, but time often turns things round in ways that could not have been foreseen at the time. Michael Bell -- |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
The London commuter market - BR's last safe haven?
Michael Bell wrote:
wrote: Michael Bell wrote: In the days when railway traffic was declining fast, and it seemed that railways might close altogether, Can't say I ever thought that was likely. What period did you have in mind? I got the impression that BR developed its London commuter market because whatever the economics, for political reasons that network could never be shut down. Too many votes depended on it. Can anybody confirm this? In what sense did BR "develop" the London commuter market? If you mean things like the Shenfield electrification, that was largely the renewal of worn-out infrastructure and trains by up-to-date technology. Such investment was certainly not confined to the London commuter market. I am thinking of the period after Beeching, when it seemed that closures would carry on til nothing was left. But Beeching himself had said that commuter railways could always be made to pay if you raised the fares high enough, and it seemed to me that the view in BR HQ after Beeching had left was that profit may no longer be the objective, but political forces would keep these routes open, so other business was neglected and effort put into the commuter market. That was the impression I had at the time. That's hardly the situation today of course, but time often turns things round in ways that could not have been foreseen at the time. As BR was also developing the InterCity market, and new railways were being planned for other cities (such as the Newcastle Metro) it seems pretty certain that you're wrong. Anyway, London wasn't entirely free of closures - the Broad Street line closed, and if there hadn't been a change of leadership, Marylebone would probably have closed. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
The London commuter market - BR's last safe haven?
Aidan Stanger wrote: As BR was also developing the InterCity market, and new railways were being planned for other cities (such as the Newcastle Metro) it seems pretty certain that you're wrong. Anyway, London wasn't entirely free of closures - the Broad Street line closed, and if there hadn't been a change of leadership, Marylebone would probably have closed. Some BR-era closures in Greater London: Harrow & Wealdstone - Belmont (1964){- Stanmore Village originally (1952)); West Drayton [& Yiewsley] - Uxbridge (Vine St) (1962); West Drayton - Staines West (1965); Nunhead - Crystal Pal HL (1954); Woodside - Selsdon (1983); Dalston Jct - Broad Street (1986); Finsbury Park - Ally Pally via Cranley Gdns (1954); East Brixton (1976); Navarino Road curve and Camden Road - Primrose Hill (1994?) Not that many really when compared with other parts of the country - Aberdeenshire for example (of course the population of Aberdeenshire is much less), and when you take into account reopenings such as Dalston Junction - Stratford, Thameslink tunnel, ELL extension (we hope) and new build: Jubilee line Baker St - Stratford; Victoria line (entire), DLR (part-reopening and part new build), Croydon Tramlink (ditto). KenS |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Crossrail safe? | London Transport | |||
Oh my God, we haven't killed Kenny after all | London Transport | |||
Make fast and safe money, This is my first try, why not have a goyourself | London Transport | |||
Using biomathematics to decide how safe tired drivers are | London Transport | |||
Its all safe again. | London Transport |