Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Aidan Stanger wrote: According to section 6.3 of http://www.towerhamlets.gov.uk/data/...ing-report.pdf the proposal to close Wapping station is just a cost saving measure, and if they can't find a way of retaining it under the current safety regulations they could build a replacement on LU owned land just N of its existing location. Firstly, is this true? Secondly, is that the reason why LU owns that land? Thirdly, why isn't the plan to retain the station better publicised? The Tower Hamlets report is dated March 2004. It seems their campaign succeeded since in August, when TfL took over the ELL project from the Strategic Snail Authority, it was announced that Wapping will not be closed. I don't know, however, what solution they have found to the technical problems at this site which led them to consider closure. |