Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just had a look at the website: http://www.ellp.co.uk/index.htm
It doesn't appear to have changed much in the last few months, has there been any signs of real activity on the ground yet? Always seems to be a vastly overpriced project to me, especially the phase 1 stuff. Which NR TOC will be absorbing the line into its empire, has this been formally decided yet? Are SWT's 458s confirmed as destined for this service - or is this just rumoured? There is a mention that extending towards Clapham Junction will help with a 'future orbital rail project', presumably this will mean reversal at CJ and up via Kensington Olympia etc? Does the track layout at CJ allow for this eventuality without huge changes? Paul |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Paul Scott" wrote in message ... There is a mention that extending towards Clapham Junction will help with a 'future orbital rail project', presumably this will mean reversal at CJ and up via Kensington Olympia etc? Does the track layout at CJ allow for this eventuality without huge changes? Trains would run from the ELL via the new spur from Surrey Quays to the SLL at Old Kent Road, then via the SLL to Wandsworth Road, then Factory Junction, Culver Road Junction, to Clapham Junction platforms 1 (which would be reinstated) and 2. Platform 2 is currently used by the Kensington Olympia and Willesden Junction shuttle - it was also used a few years back when the London Bridge - Victoria trains were diverted there (by the above route) when the route through Battersea Park was temporarily unavailable. Peter |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter Masson" wrote in message ... "Paul Scott" wrote in message ... There is a mention that extending towards Clapham Junction will help with a 'future orbital rail project', presumably this will mean reversal at CJ and up via Kensington Olympia etc? Does the track layout at CJ allow for this eventuality without huge changes? Trains would run from the ELL via the new spur from Surrey Quays to the SLL at Old Kent Road, then via the SLL to Wandsworth Road, then Factory Junction, Culver Road Junction, to Clapham Junction platforms 1 (which would be reinstated) and 2. Platform 2 is currently used by the Kensington Olympia and Willesden Junction shuttle - it was also used a few years back when the London Bridge - Victoria trains were diverted there (by the above route) when the route through Battersea Park was temporarily unavailable. Peter So at CJ it might logically operate with one platform for eastbound and one for westbound trains? Paul |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Paul Scott" a écrit dans le message de ... "Peter Masson" wrote in message ... "Paul Scott" wrote in message ... There is a mention that extending towards Clapham Junction will help with a 'future orbital rail project', presumably this will mean reversal at CJ and up via Kensington Olympia etc? Does the track layout at CJ allow for this eventuality without huge changes? Trains would run from the ELL via the new spur from Surrey Quays to the SLL at Old Kent Road, then via the SLL to Wandsworth Road, then Factory Junction, Culver Road Junction, to Clapham Junction platforms 1 (which would be reinstated) and 2. Platform 2 is currently used by the Kensington Olympia and Willesden Junction shuttle - it was also used a few years back when the London Bridge - Victoria trains were diverted there (by the above route) when the route through Battersea Park was temporarily unavailable. Peter So at CJ it might logically operate with one platform for eastbound and one for westbound trains? ISTM that in that case you would need to be very careful how to express this to the general public; a clearer terminology would be 'trains for north London via the West London line' vs 'trains for the East London Line via south London' (NB it is standard paractice not to identify platforms by reference to where arriving trains have probably come from). Regards, - Alan (in Brussels) |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Paul Scott" wrote in
: Just had a look at the website: http://www.ellp.co.uk/index.htm It doesn't appear to have changed much in the last few months, has there been any signs of real activity on the ground yet? Just seen some new construction gear on the track bed near me in Dalston - at last something seems to be happening. M. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul Scott wrote:
Just had a look at the website: http://www.ellp.co.uk/index.htm It doesn't appear to have changed much in the last few months, has there been any signs of real activity on the ground yet? Always seems to be a vastly overpriced project to me, especially the phase 1 stuff. Which NR TOC will be absorbing the line into its empire, has this been formally decided yet? Not decided, but a new franchise may be created, absorbing Silverlink's Metro services (whether that includes Watford locals is uncertain). Such a franchise would be under strict control of TfL, in a similar way to Serco's DLR operations. Are SWT's 458s confirmed as destined for this service - or is this just rumoured? Rumoured. No particularly stock is definitely destined for it yet. There is a mention that extending towards Clapham Junction will help with a 'future orbital rail project', presumably this will mean reversal at CJ and up via Kensington Olympia etc? Does the track layout at CJ allow for this eventuality without huge changes? As another poster said, the platforms would be adjacent; however, whether services actually run through from Wandsworth Road - CJ - Imperial Wharf (& v.v.) is debatable; for reliability's sake, an Orbirail service may just operate CJ - Willesden - Dalston - Peckham - CJ and return. The Circle line is an indicator that circular routes crossing a variety of junctions perform poorly, as without a proper terminus it is difficult for them to regain lost time. -- Dave Arquati Imperial College, SW7 www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
If they reversed in Clapham Junction would it be possible to have a train
"step back" to solve late running problems? There are sidings to the west of CJ platform 1/2. or at least room for reinstatement. JG. As another poster said, the platforms would be adjacent; however, whether services actually run through from Wandsworth Road - CJ - Imperial Wharf (& v.v.) is debatable; for reliability's sake, an Orbirail service may just operate CJ - Willesden - Dalston - Peckham - CJ and return. The Circle line is an indicator that circular routes crossing a variety of junctions perform poorly, as without a proper terminus it is difficult for them to regain lost time. -- Dave Arquati Imperial College, SW7 www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dave Arquati" wrote in message
... As another poster said, the platforms would be adjacent; however, whether services actually run through from Wandsworth Road - CJ - Imperial Wharf (& v.v.) is debatable; for reliability's sake, an Orbirail service may just operate CJ - Willesden - Dalston - Peckham - CJ and return. The Circle line is an indicator that circular routes crossing a variety of junctions perform poorly, as without a proper terminus it is difficult for them to regain lost time. The reliability depends on the time allowed at CJ, not on whether trains return whence they came or proceed around again. (Actually there would be an impact on reliability of circular trains caused by crossing each other's path near Clapham Junction, but that would be minor.) -- John Rowland - Spamtrapped Transport Plans for the London Area, updated 2001 http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Acro...69/tpftla.html A man's vehicle is a symbol of his manhood. That's why my vehicle's the Piccadilly Line - It's the size of a county and it comes every two and a half minutes |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Rowland wrote:
"Dave Arquati" wrote in message ... As another poster said, the platforms would be adjacent; however, whether services actually run through from Wandsworth Road - CJ - Imperial Wharf (& v.v.) is debatable; for reliability's sake, an Orbirail service may just operate CJ - Willesden - Dalston - Peckham - CJ and return. The Circle line is an indicator that circular routes crossing a variety of junctions perform poorly, as without a proper terminus it is difficult for them to regain lost time. The reliability depends on the time allowed at CJ, not on whether trains return whence they came or proceed around again. (Actually there would be an impact on reliability of circular trains caused by crossing each other's path near Clapham Junction, but that would be minor.) I meant that you can give them X minutes' turnaround at CJ, so if they're a bit late arriving then they can still leave on time - whereas on the Circle line they have some time at Aldgate but it doesn't seem to be enough to counter much late running. Publicising it as a "true" circular service, through from the SLL to the WLL, whilst allowing X5 minutes at CJ, would be annoying to passengers - much like existing waits at Aldgate or (until last week) on the Heathrow loop. However, I accept that the direction the train departs in doesn't really matter. A connection-based approach might allow a relief time at CJ with faster journeys for through journeys from West to South or vice versa. For example, the following strategy would allow 7.5 mins' relief at CJ as part of a 10 min service frequency, whilst only having a 2.5 min wait at CJ for through passengers: SLL - Platform 1 (0.0min) Platform 2 - WLL (2.5min) Train 1 WLL - Platform 2 (5.0min) Train 2 Platform 1 - SLL (7.5min) -- Dave Arquati Imperial College, SW7 www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave Arquati" wrote in message ... Paul Scott wrote: Just had a look at the website: http://www.ellp.co.uk/index.htm There is a mention that extending towards Clapham Junction will help with a 'future orbital rail project', presumably this will mean reversal at CJ and up via Kensington Olympia etc? Does the track layout at CJ allow for this eventuality without huge changes? As another poster said, the platforms would be adjacent; however, whether services actually run through from Wandsworth Road - CJ - Imperial Wharf (& v.v.) is debatable; for reliability's sake, an Orbirail service may just operate CJ - Willesden - Dalston - Peckham - CJ and return. The Circle line is an indicator that circular routes crossing a variety of junctions perform poorly, as without a proper terminus it is difficult for them to regain lost time. -- Dave Arquati Imperial College, SW7 www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London Do any existing services follow the basic route around south London, and are there paths for the Phase 2 service? Hasn't it been suggested that the Circle line could be binned without much effect on passengers, but major improvements to the Met & District reliability? Paul |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
London Underground Revenue Rapid Project: Freedom of Information request | London Transport | |||
The East London Line is dead... Long live the East London Line | London Transport | |||
Project Adorno's A-Z of the London Underground | London Transport | |||
East London Line Project News | London Transport | |||
Anyone know about East London Line Project progress? | London Transport |