On Fri, 08 Apr 2005 14:10:16 +0100, Bill Woods
wrote:

I took out an Oyster prepay in January this year and used about £10
or so that month.

How can I get detailed info on my Oystercard transactions for those
January journeys?

I asked Oyster to send me a statment in the post but it doesn't go
much further back then the printout the ticket-office at the station
can give me.

I have been getting stonewalled by Oyster who say "That's as far back
as we can go". So they reckon they can't show me my january
transaction.

See here http://tinyurl.com/6zxg7 for answers to your questions.

Looks like 8 weeks in the maximum, although I think I got more than
that when I checked mine last year...

--
Cheers,

Jason.

A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet and in e-mail?

Bill Woods wrote:
Eight weeks seems far less than a computer could hold.

Maybe TFL decided that after 8 weeks everyone would have had plenty of
opportunity to query and correct any unresolved journeys so there isn't
much point keeping the details on file.

There are a lot of Oyster cards out there and each time it is touched
on a tube / bus / tramlink / dlr / national rail that supports prepay
reader a record is stored. The amount of space used up for millions of
people's transactions is likely to be substantial so it would seem
quite sensibly to destroy after a given time.

Of course if they do store more data than they give out in a statement,
you are quite entitiled to apply for it (data protection act) but they
are allowed to charge

In article . com,
writes
Maybe TFL decided that after 8 weeks everyone would have had plenty of
opportunity to query and correct any unresolved journeys so there isn't
much point keeping the details on file.

There are a lot of Oyster cards out there and each time it is touched
on a tube / bus / tramlink / dlr / national rail that supports prepay
reader a record is stored. The amount of space used up for millions of
people's transactions is likely to be substantial so it would seem
quite sensibly to destroy after a given time.

The amount of data (in megabyte terms) isn't likely to be significant in
this day and age.

The issue is the one that you mention first, that there "isn't much
point" in keeping it. The Data Protection Act requires that you have a
good reason for retaining personal data and must destroy it when that
good reason expires. "But we might get the odd query" isn't a good
reason - if they judge that 8 weeks is a reasonable time for people to
make queries, then data (other than involved in an ongoing query) should
be destroyed after 8 weeks.

--
Clive D.W. Feather | Home:
Tel: +44 20 8495 6138 (work) | Web: http://www.davros.org
Fax: +44 870 051 9937 | Work:
Please reply to the Reply-To address, which is:

In article ,
Clive D. W. Feather wrote:
The issue is the one that you mention first, that there "isn't much
point" in keeping it.

If I were writting the DPA thingamy that describes what the data
was stored for, "the detection and prevention of fraud" would be
on the list; that might need data stored for more that 8 weeks.

But I have a bee in my bonnet about the oft forgotten third A in
security.

--
Mike Bristow - really a very good driver