Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 30 Jun 2005 07:34:20 GMT, Adrian wrote:
Neil Williams ) gurgled happily, sounding much like they were saying : couldn't a modern, lightweight OPO bus be designed? It would seem not. Is there the demand for one? I'm sure it would be technically possible if the fuel cost became so high that it would make no sense not to. A modern double decker is about 150% the weight of an RM. It's also bigger, and has either a higher passenger capacity, a wheelchair/buggy area or more legroom. These characteristics are considered desirable. If a modern decker was the same size as a RM, I very much doubt it'd be a lot heavier. A bloatibus is about 250% the weight. And has a higher (admittedly standing) passenger capacity. Neil -- Neil Williams in Milton Keynes, UK When replying please use neil at the above domain 'wensleydale' is a spam trap and is not read. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Neil Williams ) gurgled happily, sounding
much like they were saying : A modern double decker is about 150% the weight of an RM. It's also bigger, and has either a higher passenger capacity, a wheelchair/buggy area or more legroom. These characteristics are considered desirable. If a modern decker was the same size as a RM, I very much doubt it'd be a lot heavier. Is a modern double 50% larger, then? A bloatibus is about 250% the weight. And has a higher (admittedly standing) passenger capacity. 150% higher? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
BBC Heritage Routemaster Article | London Transport | |||
Heritage routes in service | London Transport | |||
RM Heritage Routes | London Transport | |||
Heritage RM Routes Commencement Date | London Transport | |||
Routemaster heritage route contracts awarded | London Transport |