London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old July 13th 05, 03:59 PM posted to alt.conspiracy,uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 676
Default They say 4 ( was 2 is more likely (was London bombs - the work of ONE man?)

"Peter Vos" typed

Now yer bein' churlish.... Edgware ROAD and Liverpool STREET


I think the proclivity for abbr. is a cultural thing. In the US we
abbr. everything. It's not New York City... it's New York.. or The
City. It's not Washington D.C. ... its DC. It's not the United States
of America .... it's the US. We don't watch television, but we love
our TV. We don't abuse prisoners at Guantanamo Bay... we hold em at
Gitmo. etc etc.


Abbreviation is fine if it does not induce ambiguity, or mislead.

I repeat: Edgware ROAD is NOT Edgware and I have had to reassure
concerned friends that I was many miles from any bombs.

Liverpool Street is NOT Liverpool.

Tottenham Court Road is NOT Tottenham. Abbreviate the former as 'TCR'
and I'm happy; abbreviate it as 'Tottenham' and you're LOST!

--
Helen D. Vecht:
Edgware.
  #2   Report Post  
Old July 14th 05, 07:49 AM posted to alt.conspiracy,uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Aug 2003
Posts: 10,125
Default They say 4 ( was 2 is more likely (was London bombs - the work of ONE man?)

In message , at 16:59:00 on
Wed, 13 Jul 2005, Helen Deborah Vecht
remarked:
Liverpool Street is NOT Liverpool.


But Liverpool Lime Street is! (Keeping on a transport topic).

Tourists at places where trains go to both LS and LLS (and I believe
there was one such pair of trains timed to depart Cambridge at the exact
same time) often do get confused.
--
Roland Perry
  #4   Report Post  
Old July 15th 05, 03:59 PM posted to alt.conspiracy,uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 856
Default They say 4 ( was 2 is more likely (was London bombs - the work of ONE man?)

In article m, Roland
Perry writes
But Liverpool Lime Street is! (Keeping on a transport topic).

Tourists at places where trains go to both LS and LLS


"LLS" being London Liverpool Street, I presume?

[I won't get my coat, because it's too hot.]

--
Clive D.W. Feather | Home:
Tel: +44 20 8495 6138 (work) | Web: http://www.davros.org
Fax: +44 870 051 9937 | Work:
Please reply to the Reply-To address, which is:
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
London Crossrail likely to work any better than Thameslink? e27002 aurora London Transport 32 January 29th 15 08:20 AM
CYCLISTS THREE TIMES MORE LIKELY TO GET INJURED ON BENDY BUS ROUTE- POPE Colin Rosenstiel London Transport 50 June 18th 07 11:16 PM
More bombs? Simon Lane London Transport 160 August 14th 05 04:40 PM
LONDON BOMBS COVER-UP: BOMBS WERE UNDER TRAINS Terrorism London London Transport 4 July 31st 05 03:34 PM
LONDON BOMBS COVER-UP: BOMBS WERE UNDER TRAINS Terrorism London London Transport 0 July 25th 05 10:40 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:23 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 London Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about London Transport"

 

Copyright © 2017