London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #31   Report Post  
Old August 1st 05, 12:30 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Dec 2004
Posts: 157
Default Bob Crow

Nursing, now will you shut up and stop whinging.

Kevin


  #32   Report Post  
Old August 1st 05, 02:16 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2005
Posts: 15
Default Bob Crow

Is the Underground recruiting drivers? I'm always reading about how
they do sweet FA for loads of money! I,ll have some of that!

  #33   Report Post  
Old August 1st 05, 09:58 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2005
Posts: 37
Default Bob Crow



rob at robertwoolley dot co dot uk

Do you want to have the responsibility of a train plus a thousand
passengers for only 33k after overtime and before stoppages? Indeed why
should public service worker work longer hours just to supplement their
wage? If you don't like the heat get out of the kitchen. All bus and
tube drivers should resign, then see how the capital copes without them.
--
Clive


Errrrrrr what over time does a tube driver earn? None. Well none roistered
or volunteered. They get 15 mins O/T if they book off 2 minutes late. And,
with the amount of late running on the Tube, there's a lot of 'O/T' being
gained for doing just there job but finishing a little late. We're not
talking about doing extra shifts. The unions saw to that.

Loony T


  #34   Report Post  
Old August 1st 05, 10:03 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2005
Posts: 37
Default Bob Crow



If you think 33k is a low wage then I think you need to think again. There
are many people in London earning much less. Also most of use don't have
to
think about our pay "before stoppages" as we don't feel the need to walk
out
of jobs on a regular basis.

Dave



33k isn't a low wage. However, how many people could survive on 33k in
London? Is it the Tube's staff's fault that they get paid a wage that
reflects what you actually need to earn to live in London? Shouldn't we be
saying to every other company, 'stop ****ing us over and give us terms and
conditions that befit the 21st century' or should just say 'you earn more
than me so we should reduce your terms and conditions'? We all know nurses,
police, LFB etc SHOULD be paid more, but isn't that down to the unions to
fight for it? Isn't right that their employers should be paying the right
and proper wages in the first place?

Loony T


  #35   Report Post  
Old August 1st 05, 10:08 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2005
Posts: 37
Default Bob Crow




Perhaps if more people were willing to walk out they might have better pay
and conditions?


If I walked out, I'd get fired.

--
James Farrar


Maybe you should join a union that actually fights for it's members rather
than get walked all over. Don't get me wrong, the RMT/ASLEF are only too
willing to walk for it's train driver members (not so keen to fight for any
other grade), but at least LUL staff get a good wage for the huge
responsibility they have on a day-to-day basis. When things run smooth the
staff are there doing their mundane run.of-the-mill duties. It's only when
the **** hits the fan i.e. stalled trains in tunnels, station evacuations,
signal failures etc that they actually come into a class of their own and
really earn their money.

Loony T




  #36   Report Post  
Old August 1st 05, 10:09 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2005
Posts: 37
Default Bob Crow




Perhaps if more people were willing to walk out they might have
better pay and conditions?


If I walked out, I'd get fired.


And if all the employees walked out?


We'd all get fired.

--
James Farrar

September's coming soon


And then there would be no company, no director earning huge 20-30% rises
each year, no share holders getting their dividend? I don't think so. Get a
back bone and grow some ******** mate

Loony T


  #37   Report Post  
Old August 1st 05, 10:12 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2005
Posts: 37
Default Bob Crow


wrote in message
oups.com...
Nursing, now will you shut up and stop whinging.

Kevin

Join the underground mate. No 3-7 year training for **** poor wages, no 70
hour weeks, no dangerous drugs to administer, no enforced over time, the
list does go on. If nursing is so bad, leave.

Loony T


  #38   Report Post  
Old August 1st 05, 10:15 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2005
Posts: 37
Default Bob Crow



As the trains can be fully automatic anyway, why have a Motorman on? Just
save money, this is obviously your aim.
--
Clive


Errrr Vic Line. Would you like to go on an underground train with no staff
on the train? Who will tell you what to do in emergency? Who will direct you
to the nearest exit when things go wrong? God (not one particular God I
hasten to add) forbid there are any more bombs, but I think that in it's
self is a fully justified reason to keep staff on trains.

Loony T


  #39   Report Post  
Old August 2nd 05, 02:14 AM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 523
Default Bob Crow

In message , Loony Tune
writes

Errrr Vic Line. Would you like to go on an underground train with no
staff on the train? Who will tell you what to do in emergency? Who will
direct you to the nearest exit when things go wrong? God (not one
particular God I hasten to add) forbid there are any more bombs, but I
think that in it's self is a fully justified reason to keep staff on
trains.

Loony T

Did I just see a light go on in someone's brain?
--
Clive
  #40   Report Post  
Old August 2nd 05, 09:11 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Dec 2003
Posts: 110
Default Bob Crow

On Mon, 1 Aug 2005 23:09:44 +0100, "Loony Tune"
wrote:




Perhaps if more people were willing to walk out they might have
better pay and conditions?


If I walked out, I'd get fired.

And if all the employees walked out?


We'd all get fired.

--
James Farrar

September's coming soon


And then there would be no company, no director earning huge 20-30% rises
each year, no share holders getting their dividend? I don't think so. Get a
back bone and grow some ******** mate

If a firm isn't in the position of a monopoly provider, then customers
go elsewhere.

Rail strikes in the 80s had this effect on freight - it generally
switched to the roads....

Rob.
--
rob at robertwoolley dot co dot uk


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bob Crow dead Recliner[_2_] London Transport 69 March 16th 14 07:00 PM
Dacre vs Crow Recliner[_2_] London Transport 0 February 1st 14 01:10 PM
Bob Crow Eurosceptic? Jim Gemineye London Transport 20 September 10th 07 09:42 AM
Bob Crow is a Complete and Utter B*ST*RD! Barry Salter London Transport 58 September 7th 07 11:09 AM
Bob Crow Gets His Claim in 7 Years Early Kev London Transport 7 February 27th 06 08:49 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:05 PM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 London Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about London Transport"

 

Copyright © 2017