![]() |
|
Piccadilly Line back on Thursday...
|
Piccadilly Line back on Thursday...
On Wed, 03 Aug 2005 17:08:47 GMT, "Richard J."
wrote: wrote: I see the District & Picc must close through Hammersmith for "important" or "urgent" work, something which can't delayed, yet they haven't even finished the endless Earl's Court - Whitechapel weekend shutdowns yet. Can't we have at least one job finished before another starts? Why would you want to delay track replacement between Barons Court and Acton Town? The quality of the ride on that stretch is awful and has led to speed restrictions. Which is exactly the point. This section of track is in a dire state and causes no end of problems - especially on the Piccadilly Line. The remainder of the line is pretty reliable these days but the SSL managed bits need work. There has been a lot of pressure placed on Metronet to sort this stretch of railway out. -- Paul C Admits to working for London Underground! |
Piccadilly Line back on Thursday...
If it was "dire" couldn't it have been done before the ECT - WCL stuff?
Of course one could ask LU after the never ending ECT - WCL work how many extra trains, how quicker the journey time, how many more reversing points etc will be provided? We can suspect the answer - a big fat zero. The in-car line diagrams on D Stock initially showed dates of suspension, this may have been amended once, now there is a catch-all sticker basically saying suspensions will occur UTFN at LU's request. By the way, who's running the show, LU or Metronot/Tube Lies? Oh no it's the latter, for the next 30 years.... Paul Corfield wrote: On Wed, 03 Aug 2005 17:08:47 GMT, "Richard J." wrote: wrote: I see the District & Picc must close through Hammersmith for "important" or "urgent" work, something which can't delayed, yet they haven't even finished the endless Earl's Court - Whitechapel weekend shutdowns yet. Can't we have at least one job finished before another starts? Why would you want to delay track replacement between Barons Court and Acton Town? The quality of the ride on that stretch is awful and has led to speed restrictions. Which is exactly the point. This section of track is in a dire state and causes no end of problems - especially on the Piccadilly Line. The remainder of the line is pretty reliable these days but the SSL managed bits need work. There has been a lot of pressure placed on Metronet to sort this stretch of railway out. -- Paul C Admits to working for London Underground! |
Piccadilly Line back on Thursday...
Paul Corfield wrote:
On Wed, 03 Aug 2005 17:08:47 GMT, "Richard J." wrote: wrote: I see the District & Picc must close through Hammersmith for "important" or "urgent" work, something which can't delayed, yet they haven't even finished the endless Earl's Court - Whitechapel weekend shutdowns yet. Can't we have at least one job finished before another starts? Why would you want to delay track replacement between Barons Court and Acton Town? The quality of the ride on that stretch is awful and has led to speed restrictions. Which is exactly the point. This section of track is in a dire state and causes no end of problems - especially on the Piccadilly Line. The remainder of the line is pretty reliable these days but the SSL managed bits need work. There has been a lot of pressure placed on Metronet to sort this stretch of railway out. I'm sure that, given the choice, most people would rather have the work completed at this point rather than delayed until later. It's good that arrangement as been made to allow the use of Travelcards on HEx and Heathrow Connect. -- Dave Arquati Imperial College, SW7 www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London |
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:57 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk