London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old December 31st 05, 12:45 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Oct 2004
Posts: 6
Default The tube strike is right!



Nick Cooper wrote:

The domain is registered to one "David Knight," who has - perhaps
understandably - chosen not to make any other details publicly
available. He's had the domain since 27/01/02, and yet what is
currently there is all he seems to have done with it in almost three
years.


Hmmm... A search on "David Knight RMT tube" on Google brings up a number of
relevant hits. The first is an article written by "David Knight - tube
worker" for Socialist Worker.

http://www.socialistworker.co.uk/art...rticle_id=6409

The second is a post on a comments section on the BBC website in support of
Aslef & the RMT over the previous Northern line closures due to "safety
fears". In his contribution he identifies himself as an "RMT Health and Rep
(stations) on the tube"

I'm sure his website will be completely impartial


--
Peter X-Files Fan
Please Note: Emailed replies cc'd / bcc'd , containing HTML or attachments
auto-binned as spam



  #2   Report Post  
Old December 31st 05, 01:18 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Oct 2003
Posts: 316
Default The tube strike is right!

On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 13:45:39 -0000, "Trust No OneŽ"
wrote:

Nick Cooper wrote:

The domain is registered to one "David Knight," who has - perhaps
understandably - chosen not to make any other details publicly
available. He's had the domain since 27/01/02, and yet what is
currently there is all he seems to have done with it in almost three
years.


Hmmm... A search on "David Knight RMT tube" on Google brings up a number of
relevant hits. The first is an article written by "David Knight - tube
worker" for Socialist Worker.

http://www.socialistworker.co.uk/art...rticle_id=6409

The second is a post on a comments section on the BBC website in support of
Aslef & the RMT over the previous Northern line closures due to "safety
fears". In his contribution he identifies himself as an "RMT Health and Rep
(stations) on the tube"

I'm sure his website will be completely impartial


The very fact that Mr Knight doesn't identify himself on the site, nor
his inherent impartiality, speaks volumes.
--
Nick Cooper

[Carefully remove the detonators from my e-mail address to reply!]

The London Underground at War, and in Films & TV:
http://www.nickcooper.org.uk/
  #3   Report Post  
Old December 31st 05, 02:32 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Dec 2005
Posts: 14
Default The tube strike is right!

Typical. When you can't win the argument annihilate a person's reputation -
or try! You have to get your facts right first. And much of what has been
posted is sooooooo wrong. Have Fun!



Happy Revolutionary New Year


"Nick Cooper" wrote in
message ...
On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 13:45:39 -0000, "Trust No OneŽ"
wrote:

Nick Cooper wrote:

The domain is registered to one "David Knight," who has - perhaps
understandably - chosen not to make any other details publicly
available. He's had the domain since 27/01/02, and yet what is
currently there is all he seems to have done with it in almost three
years.


Hmmm... A search on "David Knight RMT tube" on Google brings up a number
of
relevant hits. The first is an article written by "David Knight - tube
worker" for Socialist Worker.

http://www.socialistworker.co.uk/art...rticle_id=6409

The second is a post on a comments section on the BBC website in support
of
Aslef & the RMT over the previous Northern line closures due to "safety
fears". In his contribution he identifies himself as an "RMT Health and
Rep
(stations) on the tube"

I'm sure his website will be completely impartial


The very fact that Mr Knight doesn't identify himself on the site, nor
his inherent impartiality, speaks volumes.
--
Nick Cooper

[Carefully remove the detonators from my e-mail address to reply!]

The London Underground at War, and in Films & TV:
http://www.nickcooper.org.uk/



  #4   Report Post  
Old December 31st 05, 02:44 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Oct 2004
Posts: 947
Default The tube strike is right!

Dom1234 ) gurgled happily, sounding much like they
were saying :

Typical. When you can't win the argument annihilate a person's
reputation - or try! You have to get your facts right first. And much
of what has been posted is sooooooo wrong. Have Fun!


So, Dave, why don't you correct us?

While you're about it, please feel free to explain why you don't just
resign and get a different job elsewhere if LU are so **** to work for.
  #5   Report Post  
Old December 31st 05, 03:38 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Oct 2003
Posts: 316
Default The tube strike is right!

On Sat, 31 Dec 2005 15:32:59 -0000, "Dom1234"
wrote:

Typical. When you can't win the argument annihilate a person's reputation -
or try! You have to get your facts right first. And much of what has been
posted is sooooooo wrong. Have Fun!


Such as? Are you denying that the zoneonelondon.co.uk domain is
registered to someone by the name of David Knight, or that that name
does in fact appear on the current publicly-available pages on the
site? Are you suggesting g that - by an amazing quirk of fate - this
is not the same David Knight who is apparently intimately connected
with the RMT?

Where you think facts are wrong, it would be better for you to
identify them - and justify your objections - rather than simply
hoping that a catch-all blanket suggestion will somehow add weight to
your morally-barren arguments.
--
Nick Cooper

[Carefully remove the detonators from my e-mail address to reply!]

The London Underground at War, and in Films & TV:
http://www.nickcooper.org.uk/


  #6   Report Post  
Old January 1st 06, 09:28 AM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,346
Default The tube strike is right!

Happy Revolutionary New Year

What revolution would this be? Where overpaid dickheads only
have to work 35 hours a week? Live must be sooooo hard for
you all. If you lot were actually employable anywhere else
(and most people know you're not , which is why you never
leave despite constantly moaning about your conditions)
you'd realise what a cushy number you were on with 37.5
hours which most of us can only dream of.

Incidentaly , your actions as you know will have seriously ****ed
off a lot of the travelling public , so don't be surprised if even
more of your members get assaulted from now on. Congratulations.

B2003

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tube drivers to strike on Southern strike days Recliner[_3_] London Transport 5 November 25th 16 03:33 PM
DLR strike off - Tube Lines infraco strike still on, but Tubeservices will still run Mizter T London Transport 14 July 5th 10 10:34 AM
LU strike and possible knock-on effects on NR / LO services [was:Tube strike] Mizter T London Transport 39 June 15th 09 11:34 AM
The tube strike is right! Walter Briscoe London Transport 2 January 10th 06 09:35 AM
Bus stop sign covered and marked 'not in use' and a temporary bus stop sign right next to it Martin Rich London Transport 2 November 27th 03 08:52 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:29 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Š2004-2024 London Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about London Transport"

 

Copyright © 2017