On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 22:18:05 -0000, "Dom1234" wrote:


"Brimstone" wrote in message
...


Dom1234 wrote:
"Brimstone" wrote in message
...


Dom1234 wrote:
Loads of lies have been told about the New Years Eve tube strike.
Here's the truth!
http://www.zoneonelondon.co.uk/

Bloody troublemakers should be kicked out.
Ten who would run the tube the bosses couldn't run a **** up in a
brewery.

Did I specify who the troublemakers are?

(BTW - the convention is this NG is for bottom posting. Ta.)

OK Cheers - so who do you think the trouble makers are?


Let's bring this issue back on track. OK so there is misinformation out there
that needs to be knocked on the head and a solution found.

Can't find the solution straight away so a strike is called; fine but why on
31st December? Could you not wait until 1st January or a few days later?

Now, who is being bloodly minded?

David Bradley

"David Bradley" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 22:18:05 -0000, "Dom1234"
wrote:


"Brimstone" wrote in message
...


Dom1234 wrote:
"Brimstone" wrote in message
...


Dom1234 wrote:
Loads of lies have been told about the New Years Eve tube strike.
Here's the truth!
http://www.zoneonelondon.co.uk/

Bloody troublemakers should be kicked out.
Ten who would run the tube the bosses couldn't run a **** up in a
brewery.

Did I specify who the troublemakers are?

(BTW - the convention is this NG is for bottom posting. Ta.)

OK Cheers - so who do you think the trouble makers are?


Let's bring this issue back on track. OK so there is misinformation out
there
that needs to be knocked on the head and a solution found.

Can't find the solution straight away so a strike is called; fine but why
on
31st December? Could you not wait until 1st January or a few days later?

Now, who is being bloodly minded?

David Bradley

1. The Mayor wants the tube to run all night on NYE
2. Part of the 35 hour week deal was that staff would work NYE for NO EXTRA
pay.
3. Last NYE as part the deal they did work for no extra
4. Staff also agreed to 200 ticket office jobs going (natural wastage)
5. Now the Mayor, LU bosses and the Government want to axe 500 jobs
6. Would you still work NYE for NO EXtra if your boss reneged on a deal?

The RMT voted on it, accepted it, and their staff are now suffering from
their headlong dash towards accepting it, they didn't explain how the 35
hour week would be implemented and are now reaping the results.

Sorry to anyone who is affected.

(Top Posted to annoy Brimstone)


Dom1234 wrote:
"David Bradley" wrote in message
...

On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 22:18:05 -0000, "Dom1234"
wrote:


"Brimstone" wrote in message
...


Dom1234 wrote:

"Brimstone" wrote in message
...


Dom1234 wrote:

Loads of lies have been told about the New Years Eve tube strike.
Here's the truth!
http://www.zoneonelondon.co.uk/

Bloody troublemakers should be kicked out.

Ten who would run the tube the bosses couldn't run a **** up in a
brewery.

Did I specify who the troublemakers are?

(BTW - the convention is this NG is for bottom posting. Ta.)


OK Cheers - so who do you think the trouble makers are?


Let's bring this issue back on track. OK so there is misinformation out
there
that needs to be knocked on the head and a solution found.

Can't find the solution straight away so a strike is called; fine but why
on
31st December? Could you not wait until 1st January or a few days later?

Now, who is being bloodly minded?

David Bradley


1. The Mayor wants the tube to run all night on NYE
2. Part of the 35 hour week deal was that staff would work NYE for NO EXTRA
pay.
3. Last NYE as part the deal they did work for no extra
4. Staff also agreed to 200 ticket office jobs going (natural wastage)
5. Now the Mayor, LU bosses and the Government want to axe 500 jobs
6. Would you still work NYE for NO EXtra if your boss reneged on a deal?

"www.waspies.net" wrote in message
...
The RMT voted on it, accepted it, and their staff are now suffering from
their headlong dash towards accepting it, they didn't explain how the 35
hour week would be implemented and are now reaping the results.

Sorry to anyone who is affected.

(Top Posted to annoy Brimstone)


Dom1234 wrote:
"David Bradley" wrote in message
...

On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 22:18:05 -0000, "Dom1234"
wrote:


"Brimstone" wrote in message
...


Dom1234 wrote:

"Brimstone" wrote in message
...


Dom1234 wrote:

Loads of lies have been told about the New Years Eve tube strike.
Here's the truth!
http://www.zoneonelondon.co.uk/

Bloody troublemakers should be kicked out.

Ten who would run the tube the bosses couldn't run a **** up in a
brewery.

Did I specify who the troublemakers are?

(BTW - the convention is this NG is for bottom posting. Ta.)


OK Cheers - so who do you think the trouble makers are?


Let's bring this issue back on track. OK so there is misinformation out
there
that needs to be knocked on the head and a solution found.

Can't find the solution straight away so a strike is called; fine but why
on
31st December? Could you not wait until 1st January or a few days later?

Now, who is being bloodly minded?

David Bradley


1. The Mayor wants the tube to run all night on NYE
2. Part of the 35 hour week deal was that staff would work NYE for NO
EXTRA pay.
3. Last NYE as part the deal they did work for no extra
4. Staff also agreed to 200 ticket office jobs going (natural wastage)
5. Now the Mayor, LU bosses and the Government want to axe 500 jobs
6. Would you still work NYE for NO EXtra if your boss reneged on a deal?

What "www.waspies.net" has said is partly true but this highlights what a
load of ****E the LU management are. They promised no staff reductions, 200
ticket jobs lossed and full consultation on rosters.

Now they want 500 job losses and imposed rosters. The management have
reneged on the original deal. They are trying to shaft the best union on the
railways.

Dom1234 ) gurgled happily, sounding much like they
were saying :

this highlights what a load of ****E the LU management are.

If they're that bad, why work for them?
Why not resign and get a job elsewhere?

"Dom1234" Use a hotmail or yahoo account for posting to usenet wrote in
message ...

"www.waspies.net" wrote in message
...
The RMT voted on it, accepted it, and their staff are now suffering from
their headlong dash towards accepting it, they didn't explain how the 35
hour week would be implemented and are now reaping the results.

Sorry to anyone who is affected.

(Top Posted to annoy Brimstone)


Dom1234 wrote:
"David Bradley" wrote in message
...

On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 22:18:05 -0000, "Dom1234"
wrote:


"Brimstone" wrote in message
...


Dom1234 wrote:

"Brimstone" wrote in message
...


Dom1234 wrote:

Loads of lies have been told about the New Years Eve tube strike.
Here's the truth!
http://www.zoneonelondon.co.uk/

Bloody troublemakers should be kicked out.

Ten who would run the tube the bosses couldn't run a **** up in a
brewery.

Did I specify who the troublemakers are?

(BTW - the convention is this NG is for bottom posting. Ta.)


OK Cheers - so who do you think the trouble makers are?


Let's bring this issue back on track. OK so there is misinformation out
there
that needs to be knocked on the head and a solution found.

Can't find the solution straight away so a strike is called; fine but
why on
31st December? Could you not wait until 1st January or a few days
later?

Now, who is being bloodly minded?

David Bradley


1. The Mayor wants the tube to run all night on NYE
2. Part of the 35 hour week deal was that staff would work NYE for NO
EXTRA pay.
3. Last NYE as part the deal they did work for no extra
4. Staff also agreed to 200 ticket office jobs going (natural wastage)
5. Now the Mayor, LU bosses and the Government want to axe 500 jobs
6. Would you still work NYE for NO EXtra if your boss reneged on a deal?

What "www.waspies.net" has said is partly true but this highlights what a
load of ****E the LU management are. They promised no staff reductions,
200 ticket jobs lossed and full consultation on rosters.

Now they want 500 job losses and imposed rosters. The management have
reneged on the original deal. They are trying to shaft the best union on
the railways.


RMT "the best union on the railways"??? I'm a frayed knot.
I think you'll find that the title of Best union on railways belongs to
ASLEF.........

Dom1234 wrote:
1. The Mayor wants the tube to run all night on NYE
2. Part of the 35 hour week deal was that staff would work NYE for NO EXTRA
pay.
3. Last NYE as part the deal they did work for no extra
4. Staff also agreed to 200 ticket office jobs going (natural wastage)
5. Now the Mayor, LU bosses and the Government want to axe 500 jobs
6. Would you still work NYE for NO EXtra if your boss reneged on a deal?

Your (6) might seem superficially convincing, if only you
hadn't already explained that the staff get a 35hr week
(partly) as a result of working NYE for no extra. Also,
at no time in 1-5 did you explain that the deal involved
no job losses.

#Paul

Correction regarding the ballot:
Over 50% of ballot papers returned not a third. The strike will succeed and
the RMT will be proved right

Regarding NYE working:
Yes the tube workers have already fulfilled part of the agreement by working
last NYE for no extra but they have not yet started working 35 hours. This
past year TW have worked a 37.5 hour week. Now the company wants more than
agreed. NO JOB LOSSES WAS PROMISED BY MANAGEMENT.

Ask a manager Gerry Duffy 07834336987


wrote in message
...
Dom1234 wrote:
1. The Mayor wants the tube to run all night on NYE
2. Part of the 35 hour week deal was that staff would work NYE for NO
EXTRA
pay.
3. Last NYE as part the deal they did work for no extra
4. Staff also agreed to 200 ticket office jobs going (natural wastage)
5. Now the Mayor, LU bosses and the Government want to axe 500 jobs
6. Would you still work NYE for NO EXtra if your boss reneged on a deal?

Your (6) might seem superficially convincing, if only you
hadn't already explained that the staff get a 35hr week
(partly) as a result of working NYE for no extra. Also,
at no time in 1-5 did you explain that the deal involved
no job losses.

#Paul

Dom1234 ) gurgled happily, sounding much like they
were saying :

Ask a manager Gerry Duffy 078xxxxxxxx

How about you post YOUR real name and real mobile phone number?

My name is ***************** and my mobile is ************** and my land
line is ************** and my address *******************
***************************************





"Adrian" wrote in message
. 244.170...
Dom1234 ) gurgled happily, sounding much like they
were saying :

Ask a manager Gerry Duffy 078xxxxxxxx

How about you post YOUR real name and real mobile phone number?