Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mizter T wrote:
Martin Underwood wrote: Martin Underwood wrote in message : Every Strangers Eyes wrote in message : I got off the bus feeling very self rightous but what are peoples thoughts on this? Tell the driver you're going to throw up. They soon let you off. It's worth a try, especially if you go up to his cab and lean in towards him as you say it!!! When buses are on a planned diversion, so the drivers make any effort to warn the passengers beforehand, so as to say "this is the last stop [before the diversion] where you can get off for the next n miles"? Silly question - I'm sure they don't - that would involve thinking of their passengers' needs before the needs of Health and Safety. Sorry, that should read "When buses are on a planned diversion, DO the drivers make any effort..." Occasionally they do, more often than not they don't. Would be great if it became standard practice. Nobody, apart from you, has made any connection to health and safety rules precluding drivers making announcements. Basic common sense would suggest that as buses are now often fitted with PA systems there is no such exclusion. Basic common sense would also suggest that announcements are not best made when a driver is negotiating a difficult section of road. The lack of announcements woud appear to be a case of poor practice, perhaps in part because the lack of PA systems until recently means there hasn't been time for such a good practice to emerge, rather a result of the ever present H&S gremlin that many appear to believe is perpetually lurking in the shadows pulling the strings on order to frustrate them. I think announcements when driving conditions permit would be a big bonus. I've noticed some bendy bus drivers making them. I'd really appreciate announcements that a bus is going to terminate short - sometimes they change destination mid-route without telling anyone, which is extremely frustrating. The new iBus system should take care of routine announcements for upcoming stops. -- Dave Arquati Imperial College, SW7 www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Arquati wrote:
(snip) I think announcements when driving conditions permit would be a big bonus. I've noticed some bendy bus drivers making them. I'd really appreciate announcements that a bus is going to terminate short - sometimes they change destination mid-route without telling anyone, which is extremely frustrating. The new iBus system should take care of routine announcements for upcoming stops. That said sometimes the announcements can be confusing in themselves. I was on a number 12 going north when the driver received instructions to stop short of his destination - his announcement was along the lines of "this bus will no longer be going to Oxford, it will now be terminating at Trafalgar, to go to Oxford please get on the bus behind me". I was left wondering whether if I got on the next I really could get to Oxford for 80p, albeit taking ages and stopping every quarter of a mile. Meanwhile I wondered what would happen if I stayed put - would I be transported to south west Spain, even back to 1805! To be fair everyone seemed to understand his announcement and dissapointingly no-one else seemed to be even remotely amused. Another thing I think is a good practice that's only adopted on some routes is having a black-on-yellow strip on the destination blind reading "parrtial route" or something similar. This clearly provides a visual aid to passengers that the bus isn't going all the way (IYSWIM!). I'm not sure about the new iBus system - specifically, about the automatic announcements that'll be part of the system. It could be really annoying! Perhaps only key stops could have announcements, such as full (i.e. non-request) bus stops. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message . com,
Mizter T writes Another thing I think is a good practice that's only adopted on some routes is having a black-on-yellow strip on the destination blind reading "parrtial route" or something similar. This clearly provides a visual aid to passengers that the bus isn't going all the way (IYSWIM!). *Does* this system exist "on some routes" in London?! I've seen it done in Paris but never in London! (Actually, some form of "flag" to suggest a short working, such as Travel West midlands' "E" suffix, is I reckon a good, simple idea.) -- Ian Jelf, MITG Birmingham, UK Registered Blue Badge Tourist Guide for London and the Heart of England http://www.bluebadge.demon.co.uk |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ian Jelf wrote:
In message . com, Mizter T writes Another thing I think is a good practice that's only adopted on some routes is having a black-on-yellow strip on the destination blind reading "parrtial route" or something similar. This clearly provides a visual aid to passengers that the bus isn't going all the way (IYSWIM!). *Does* this system exist "on some routes" in London?! I've seen it done in Paris but never in London! I've seen it done on the 207, when there's a short working from Shepherd's Bush to Ealing Hospital or Acton Tram Depot; the blind says the destination with "Part route only" below it in smaller type, all black-on-yellow. I think it's very useful, and should be extended to other routes if possible. (Actually, some form of "flag" to suggest a short working, such as Travel West midlands' "E" suffix, is I reckon a good, simple idea.) -- Dave Arquati Imperial College, SW7 www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 20 Aug 2006 20:04:18 +0100, Ian Jelf
wrote: In message . com, Mizter T writes Another thing I think is a good practice that's only adopted on some routes is having a black-on-yellow strip on the destination blind reading "parrtial route" or something similar. This clearly provides a visual aid to passengers that the bus isn't going all the way (IYSWIM!). *Does* this system exist "on some routes" in London?! I've seen it done in Paris but never in London! A quirk of blinds on buses operated by First. There are a number of special features on them and many of them work rather well. Needless to say the BBC (Bus Blinds Committee of TfL - I kid you not) is now stamping on all of this individuality so we can be reduced to the hopeless dull, uninformative crap that is being seen on new buses on recently retendered routes. In other words single line destination displays with no via points and utterly meaningless names for certain locations - Clapham Park for Streatham Hill, Atkins Rd on the 45s and the now classic Manor Circus which is really Richmond on the route 493. This latter one has now been "repealed" by the BBC and Richmond can be used on route 493 blinds! (Actually, some form of "flag" to suggest a short working, such as Travel West midlands' "E" suffix, is I reckon a good, simple idea.) Yes - it is an elegant solution if you have electronic displays or four track number blinds. I suspect it would not work on conventional blinds in London as you'd probably need an E variant for every number which for some garages would result in blinds that were too big for the blind boxes. -- Paul C Admits to working for London Underground! |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Paul Corfield
writes A quirk of blinds on buses operated by First. There are a number of special features on them and many of them work rather well. Needless to say the BBC (Bus Blinds Committee of TfL - I kid you not) Boggle is now stamping on all of this individuality so we can be reduced to the hopeless dull, uninformative crap that is being seen on new buses on recently retendered routes. In other words single line destination displays with no via points and utterly meaningless names for certain locations - Clapham Park for Streatham Hill, Atkins Rd on the 45s This single line display with no "via" points is truly *ludicrous*. I hope it's a fad. and the now classic Manor Circus which is really Richmond on the route 493. This latter one has now been "repealed" by the BBC and Richmond can be used on route 493 blinds! Sanity prevails! Now to work on those "via" points....... -- Ian Jelf, MITG Birmingham, UK Registered Blue Badge Tourist Guide for London and the Heart of England http://www.bluebadge.demon.co.uk |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ian Jelf wrote:
In message , Paul Corfield writes A quirk of blinds on buses operated by First. There are a number of special features on them and many of them work rather well. Needless to say the BBC (Bus Blinds Committee of TfL - I kid you not) Boggle is now stamping on all of this individuality so we can be reduced to the hopeless dull, uninformative crap that is being seen on new buses on recently retendered routes. In other words single line destination displays with no via points and utterly meaningless names for certain locations - Clapham Park for Streatham Hill, Atkins Rd on the 45s This single line display with no "via" points is truly *ludicrous*. I hope it's a fad. Indeed - I've noticed this on both the 13 and the 9 for certain vehicles - simply stating "Aldwych" is very pointless by itself, and is extremely unhelpful to visitors when trying to work out which of dozens of buses to catch from Oxford Street, for example. The slap in the face is that the text isn't even much bigger than on the types of blind it replaced! I hope this is a swing too far in one direction - the other end of the scale being the tall, narrow text used on some older vehicles that operate sometimes on the 49, 148, 52 and N9 amongst others. There's a happy medium in existence, let's hope it gets back there! and the now classic Manor Circus which is really Richmond on the route 493. This latter one has now been "repealed" by the BBC and Richmond can be used on route 493 blinds! Sanity prevails! Now to work on those "via" points....... -- Dave Arquati Imperial College, SW7 www.alwaystouchout.com - Transport projects in London |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 20 Aug 2006 22:18:49 +0100, Ian Jelf
wrote: In message , Paul Corfield writes A quirk of blinds on buses operated by First. There are a number of special features on them and many of them work rather well. Needless to say the BBC (Bus Blinds Committee of TfL - I kid you not) Boggle It would be nice if they actually rode on some bus routes to see where people live and what they expect to see on the front of a bus. is now stamping on all of this individuality so we can be reduced to the hopeless dull, uninformative crap that is being seen on new buses on recently retendered routes. In other words single line destination displays with no via points and utterly meaningless names for certain locations - Clapham Park for Streatham Hill, Atkins Rd on the 45s This single line display with no "via" points is truly *ludicrous*. I hope it's a fad. Nope - it's called DDA compliance and thus will be implemented everywhere. Quite why Lothian Buses are compliant with their via points and TfL must be different no one has properly explained. and the now classic Manor Circus which is really Richmond on the route 493. This latter one has now been "repealed" by the BBC and Richmond can be used on route 493 blinds! Sanity prevails! Now to work on those "via" points....... This has been argued endlessly on various yahoo type groups including input from people very senior and very close to the debate. I fear there is no possible reprieve for via points on front blinds in the same way as there is no likely reprieve for proper timetables, timetable booklets and possibly the quadrant bus maps - it is rumoured only one or maybe two more editions will be published before they die at the hands of "simple" information. -- Paul C Admits to working for London Underground! |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Paul Corfield
writes Nope - it's called DDA compliance and thus will be implemented everywhere. Quite why Lothian Buses are compliant with their via points and TfL must be different no one has properly explained. And that is one ray of hope I retain for future provision of "via" points, old optimist that I am. Reducing the amount of information so the limited amount left is legible is wooly thinking at best. and the now classic Manor Circus which is really Richmond on the route 493. This latter one has now been "repealed" by the BBC and Richmond can be used on route 493 blinds! Sanity prevails! Now to work on those "via" points....... This has been argued endlessly on various yahoo type groups including input from people very senior and very close to the debate. I fear there is no possible reprieve for via points on front blinds in the same way as there is no likely reprieve for proper timetables, timetable booklets and possibly the quadrant bus maps - Is any/all of that because of DDA-related issues? it is rumoured only one or maybe two more editions will be published before they die at the hands of "simple" information. I want to move to Switzerland....... :-)) -- Ian Jelf, MITG Birmingham, UK Registered Blue Badge Tourist Guide for London and the Heart of England http://www.bluebadge.demon.co.uk |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Please stand behind the line as the train approaches and let passengers off before boarding | London Transport | |||
Oyster Exits at Kings Cross St Pancras not being recorded | London Transport | |||
Luggage from T5 opening fiasco now being auctioned off | London Transport | |||
being let through barriers with an Oyster, a couple of Qs | London Transport | |||
Oystercard 'price capping' not being introduced at fares revision | London Transport |