Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Paul from SafeSpeed on BBC Breakfast today on Driving Offence Cameras
Jerry wrote:
"Knight Of The Road" wrote in message ... "Silk" wrote How am I able to opt of having to drive at 30mph past a speed camera on a road good for 60mph? I wouild dispute that 60mph is a safe speed at which to drive in any built-up area unless there is physical separation between road and dwellings. OK - How am I to opt out of driving at 40 on a road good for 60, or even 70 mph? Two oprtions:- 1) Comply with the speed limit. 2) Give up driving completely. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Paul from SafeSpeed on BBC Breakfast today on Driving OffenceCameras
Brimstone wrote:
[...] Two oprtions:- 1) Comply with the speed limit. 2) Give up driving completely. Three options: 3) Don't elect nasty control freak ******* to anything. A |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Paul from SafeSpeed on BBC Breakfast today on Driving Offence Cameras
Alistair J Murray wrote:
Brimstone wrote: [...] Two oprtions:- 1) Comply with the speed limit. 2) Give up driving completely. Three options: 3) Don't elect nasty control freak ******* to anything. If it was the case that it was only our elected representatives (I use the term loosely) who were responsible for such things you might have a point. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Paul from SafeSpeed on BBC Breakfast today on Driving Offence Cameras
Brimstone wrote: Alistair J Murray wrote: Brimstone wrote: [...] Two oprtions:- 1) Comply with the speed limit. 2) Give up driving completely. Three options: 3) Don't elect nasty control freak ******* to anything. If it was the case that it was only our elected representatives (I use the term loosely) who were responsible for such things you might have a point. If there were an option to vote in one government to run the roads and one to run the rest of the economy then bring the Tories back just for their roads policy, at least for how it was in the 1990s when they were actually in the process of making the A406 into a decent grade-separated dual-carriageway and didn't quite get the chance to finish the job. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Paul from SafeSpeed on BBC Breakfast today on Driving Offence Cameras
Earl Purple wrote:
Brimstone wrote: Alistair J Murray wrote: Brimstone wrote: [...] Two oprtions:- 1) Comply with the speed limit. 2) Give up driving completely. Three options: 3) Don't elect nasty control freak ******* to anything. If it was the case that it was only our elected representatives (I use the term loosely) who were responsible for such things you might have a point. If there were an option to vote in one government to run the roads and one to run the rest of the economy then bring the Tories back just for their roads policy, at least for how it was in the 1990s when they were actually in the process of making the A406 into a decent grade-separated dual-carriageway and didn't quite get the chance to finish the job. The M25 was built to relieve traffic from the A406 (the North Circular). Why does it need to be a grade seperated urban motorway (in all but name)? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Being told of your offence | London Transport | |||
Being told of your offence | London Transport | |||
Being told of your offence | London Transport | |||
Good Luck, Paul Corfield | London Transport | |||
No platform adverts at St Paul's | London Transport |