Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Tristán White wrote: " wrote in ps.com: BIG SNIP Get a life. As those here who know me on a social level can testament, I certainly do have a life. And one I live to the full (too much, some may say). I appreciate modern conceptual art for what it is and some of that includes graffiti art. Yes, I do have "Wall and Piece" by Banksy and I have even been to a Banksy event. I also read on the tube, occasionally watch films on my PSP too, but I can also appreciate some great art in the form of graffiti on a disused siding. And to answer another reply on this thread, if Banksy came and stencilled one of his artworks on my front wall, no I would not be ****ed off in the slightest. You may find that hard to believe. I don't care, to be honest. Tristan, whilst I am the first to defend someone's personal expression and enjoyment of freedom (whether that is to paint in an asinine way or for others to enjoy such visual concoctions) that really isn't the point is it? The real point is that it is uncivilised (to say nothing of criminality) to take a paint brush or spray can and use it on property that does not belong to one, or over which one has no perimission to paint. To that extent, I refuse to accept that the product of such activity is "art". Once one goes down the path of allowing the end (though I would disagree that the "end" in this instance is anything but visually unappealing, but that's just my opinion) to justify the means, you end up with some very dangerous results. You may not like plain brick walls - to wit your reference to "boring" journeys. Well, actually, I do. I am far more impressed by the engineering skills and hard work of Victorian navvies who built our railways and whose work has stood the test of time, and to marvel at their brickwork, than the graffitii vandals who despoil the brickwork. So, whose preference should prevail? Well if those "artists" are so popular and have a following, of which you seem to be one, then let them have their work exhibited, have prints made, books published etc. If they have a large enouhg following, they will do well financially and good luck to them. Then, your thirst for such "art" can be quenched, and leave those of us who enjoy plain, unadulterated brickwork to do so. But, for Heaven's sake don't attempt to justify their criminality - trespass, criminal damage and, presumably, unlawfully purchasing (or stealing) spray paints if underage. And, just suppose you had a treasured and unique piece of "Banksy's" work on your wall at home. Are you really saying that you would not mind some lesser-known graffiti vandal using his spray can over "Banksy's" masterpiece? That seems to me to be the logical conclusion of the strange attitude you express. Marc. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Oh my God, we haven't killed Kenny after all | London Transport | |||
Boys killed by Underground train in Barking | London Transport | |||
Camden Underground Graffiti | London Transport | |||
7 boys fm Stansted | London Transport | |||
Graffiti on London Underground Trains - continues | London Transport |