Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 31 Mar, 13:40, "alex_t" wrote:
Improvement in service levels? The line is still one track to the Bow Road - how can there be any serious improvements? The second platform essentially acts as a passing loop. Now two trains can be east of Pudding Mill Lane instead of just one. U |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 31, 8:21 am, "TheOneKEA" wrote:
On Mar 31, 2:24 am, "alex_t" wrote: Great! So now instead of same platform interchange with Central line (as currently) or dedicated footbridge (as was planned) there will be inconvenient two stairs interchange through existing overcrowded subway... and I guess it will remain so until the Olympics... And I wonder which of the two subways will be used - the crowded one or the extremely crowded one. I hope the new platforms will be work of art - otherwise they would not worth the change! Right.... Seriously, I doubt that the loss of the same-level interchange with the westbound Central Line is that great a hardship compared to the vast improvement in service levels, passenger comfort and station integration that will be accomplished with the opening of the new high- level DLR terminus. I would understand your concern if same-level interchange was available to both directions of the Central, but in this case I don't think it's that great a problem. Why do you think there will be no footbridge? It is still shown on the plans on TfL's website on the pages both for the current DLR works and for the future station redevelopments. I presume the bridge cannot be be constructed while the existing platform is still in use due to lack of safe working space, there is barely enough room for passenger circulation as it is. |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "umpston" wrote in message ups.com... On Mar 31, 8:21 am, "TheOneKEA" wrote: On Mar 31, 2:24 am, "alex_t" wrote: Great! So now instead of same platform interchange with Central line (as currently) or dedicated footbridge (as was planned) there will be inconvenient two stairs interchange through existing overcrowded subway... and I guess it will remain so until the Olympics... And I wonder which of the two subways will be used - the crowded one or the extremely crowded one. I hope the new platforms will be work of art - otherwise they would not worth the change! Right.... Seriously, I doubt that the loss of the same-level interchange with the westbound Central Line is that great a hardship compared to the vast improvement in service levels, passenger comfort and station integration that will be accomplished with the opening of the new high- level DLR terminus. I would understand your concern if same-level interchange was available to both directions of the Central, but in this case I don't think it's that great a problem. Why do you think there will be no footbridge? It is still shown on the plans on TfL's website on the pages both for the current DLR works and for the future station redevelopments. I presume the bridge cannot be be constructed while the existing platform is still in use due to lack of safe working space, there is barely enough room for passenger circulation as it is. It looks very much from the second (overall station layout) drawing as though the bridge over to platform 3/5 will land on the site of the current platform 4 trackbed, where the platform is to be widened, but as you say, commencing the work now would unacceptably block the existing circulation area. http://developments.dlr.co.uk/pdf/en...ayout_plan.pdf http://www.tfl.gov.uk/assets/downloa...orm-Layout.pdf Paul |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Why do you think there will be no footbridge? It is still shown on the plans on TfL's website on the pages both for the current DLR works and for the future station redevelopments. I presume the bridge cannot be be constructed while the existing platform is still in use due to lack of safe working space, there is barely enough room for passenger circulation as it is. I hope that you are right! |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Stratford Regional-Stratford Intl on DLR | London Transport | |||
NLL Closure / DLR to Stratford International | London Transport | |||
Stratford DLR | London Transport | |||
TfL Board gives approval for next step for DLR Stratford extension | London Transport | |||
DLR or Jubilee line extension to Stratford International - two questions | London Transport |