London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old August 9th 03, 12:28 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Aug 2003
Posts: 66
Default UK subway systems

John Rowland writes
Also, here in the UK we tend to use the word "subway"
to describe a pedestrian underpass beneath a road,
rather than an underground railway system.


No: in Glasgow the underground railway is referred to by most people as
"The Subway". In London "subway" can only mean a pedestrian underpass.


Er, he did say 'tend to use' - not 'exclusively use'.

In Glasgow, the system's official name has only recently reverted to
being the 'Subway' after more than 20 years of officially being the
'Underground'

--
Dave
  #2   Report Post  
Old August 10th 03, 06:53 AM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 403
Default UK subway systems

Martin Underwood:
Also, here in the UK we tend to use the word "subway"
to describe a pedestrian underpass beneath a road,
rather than an underground railway system.


John Rowland:
No: in Glasgow the underground railway is referred to by most
people as "The Subway". In London "subway" can only mean a
pedestrian underpass.


Dave writes:
In Glasgow, the system's official name has only recently reverted to
being the 'Subway' after more than 20 years of officially being the
'Underground'


But it was officially the Subway for more than 70 years before that.

As well as pedestrian tunnels, the word "subway" in Britain also seems
to be associated with underground railways using cable haulage. The
first of these was in London, a very short line operated by a single
car for just a few months before it failed, and it was called the
Tower Subway.

Later a longer underground cable railway was planned for London, and
it was going to be called the City of London and Southwark Subway.
The management changed their minds while it was under construction,
substituting electric locomotives, and then changed the name to the
City and South London Railway.

(For more on both lines, see the Northern Line page of CULG
http://www.davros.org/rail/culg.)

And the Glasgow Subway used cable-hauled trains from 1896 until 1935.
--
Mark Brader | Yet again, I begged him to explain himself in plain
Toronto | English. This request always surprises him, as he
| is always under the extraordinary impression that
| he has done so. -- Lynn & Jay, "Yes Minister"

My text in this article is in the public domain.
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ELL: poor passenger information systems Clive Page[_4_] London Transport 22 May 22nd 10 11:27 AM
Why don't tube staff enforce the routing systems in stations? [email protected] London Transport 26 December 26th 06 10:39 AM
Delivering an 'Intelligent Transport Systems' Andy London Transport 1 November 23rd 06 02:26 PM
coffee mugs of other european subway systems ChevyChasen London Transport 1 December 29th 05 10:55 AM
A nice primer on London Tube vs. MTA Subway Knotso London Transport 6 September 30th 03 05:41 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:36 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 London Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about London Transport"

 

Copyright © 2017