Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
BRB Class 465 wrote:
I believe test trains will start running to T5 fairly soon, and it's a considerable logistical challenge to train a whole line's drivers without disrupting the everyday service. Walking the tunnels is one way of speeding up this process. Really? I can't believe they can learn anything useful by walking the tunnel. Do brand new Picc drivers have to walk from Cockfosters to Uxbridge before they are allowed to drive their first train? To me, the obvious way to do it is to run a low percentage of trains to T5 so that the drivers can do it empty at 15mph. All the passengers would be kicked out at T123. Negligible disruption to passengers. Or just use a simulator! |
#22
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 14 May 2007 15:46:38 -0700, MIG
wrote: On May 14, 4:44 pm, "John Rowland" wrote: chunky munky wrote: Other stations where the LUL entrance/exit is via another building is High St Kensington, Bond Street, Bond St station has two exits direct to the street, one of which is in Stratford Place. Hammersmith (Dist & Picc), Fulham Broadway I think Fulham Broadway has an exit to the street, but it is only open during footie matches. There must be a few stations whose only exit is via a public subway, which is a kind of building and isn't part of the station. Eg Gants Hill. Hyde Park Corner? Marble Arch? |
#23
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
James Farrar wrote:
There must be a few stations whose only exit is via a public subway, which is a kind of building and isn't part of the station. Eg Gants Hill. Hyde Park Corner? Probably Marble Arch? No, there is a direct entrance on the north side of, er, Marble Arch. |
#24
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Rowland:
The old Wood Lane Station and the original Charing Cross terminus of CCHR were one-way on a loop... No, there was no loop at the original 1907 CCE&HR [Northern Line] terminus of Charing Cross -- later called Charing Cross (Strand), then Strand, and now once again Charing Cross. That was an ordinary two-track terminus. The one-way loop station was the terminus of the 1914 extension -- the station originally called Charing Cross (Embankment), then Charing Cross, then Charing Cross Embankment, and now Embankment. When the line was extended again in 1926, the loop was closed. This became important during World War II because part of it was under the Thames. The running tunnels under the river (as well as the District Line under the Victoria Embankment) had to be provided with floodgates, but the loop could just be sealed with concrete. As it turned out, the sealed-off loop was the only Underground tunnel to be flooded by the river following a bomb hit. John's right about Wood Lane, except he didn't specify that he meant the station of that name on the Central London Railway [Central Line], not the one on the Metropolitan Railway [Hammersmth & City Line]. It was a one-way loop terminus from 1908 until 1920. -- Mark Brader, Toronto | "Where is down special?" ... "Good." | "Do you refuse to answer my question?" "Don't know." My text in this article is in the public domain. |
#25
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 15, 1:22 am, "John Rowland"
wrote: BRB Class 465 wrote: I believe test trains will start running to T5 fairly soon, and it's a considerable logistical challenge to train a whole line's drivers without disrupting the everyday service. Walking the tunnels is one way of speeding up this process. Really? I can't believe they can learn anything useful by walking the tunnel. Do brand new Picc drivers have to walk from Cockfosters to Uxbridge before they are allowed to drive their first train? To me, the obvious way to do it is to run a low percentage of trains to T5 so that the drivers can do it empty at 15mph. All the passengers would be kicked out at T123. Negligible disruption to passengers. Or just use a simulator! This was only Instructor Operators and TubeLines Test Operators, plus a load of Managers...... This wasy they can show all the other drivers so come next year they wont have Operators refusing to run to T5 as they dont know the route - which is usually what happens as LUL leave things like this to the last minute - Wembley Park platform 6 to Neasden Depot springs to mind here - so well done LUL! Also the trains will run Empty from Northfields Depot - T5 - Northfields Depot |
#26
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 15 May 2007 01:27:56 +0100, James Farrar wrote:
There must be a few stations whose only exit is via a public subway, which is a kind of building and isn't part of the station. Eg Gants Hill. Hyde Park Corner? Marble Arch? Old Street, Hanger Lane... |
#27
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 14 May 2007 22:46:14 +0100, "Recliner"
wrote: wrote in message What about Blake Hall, North Weald and Ongar did they used to use only one platform? Now those really were little-used stations, and not the only ones to have but a single operational platform. But none of them were one-way like T4. The pedant in me would like to point out that North Weald had a passing loop, and thus two platforms, although it fell out of use during the last years. Two standard stock tube trains passing at North Weald under semaphore signalling - that was something to remember. -- Bill Hayles http://billnot.com |
#28
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 15, 10:20 am, asdf wrote:
On Tue, 15 May 2007 01:27:56 +0100, James Farrar wrote: There must be a few stations whose only exit is via a public subway, which is a kind of building and isn't part of the station. Eg Gants Hill. Hyde Park Corner? Marble Arch? Old Street, Hanger Lane... Notting Hill Gate I think. |
#29
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 14 May 2007, Recliner wrote:
"John Rowland" wrote in message Speaking of airports, I just found a reference to Kenley Airport, Aerodrome. and a quick look at Windows Live Local showed me that there is indeed an airport in Greater London that I'd never heard of! What flies from there? Looking at the spy pictures, i see gliders and light planes, suggesting it's not used for passenger flights. Bonus for John - what's this: http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?f=q&hl...&t=k&z=18&om=1 ? There's a hint in the PS! Me too. But I bet it doesn't have its own tube station! Not quite, but it's a stone's throw from Whyteleafe, Upper Warlingham and Whyteleafe South stations. I'm sure one of those could be renamed accordingly! A quick Google found this page: www.danhamblin.btinternet.co.uk/pages/bob.htm Interesting. tom PS Photo hint - see if you can find out what the building south of it is. PPS Not that i actually know what that thing is myself! -- I didn't think, "I'm going to change the world." No, I'm just going to build the best machines I can build that I would want to use in my own life. -- Woz |
#30
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Recliner
writes What about Blake Hall, North Weald and Ongar did they used to use only one platform? Now those really were little-used stations, and not the only ones to have but a single operational platform. But none of them were one-way like T4. Well, trains only left in one direction (ditto for Mill Hill East). Tramlink has several one-way stations. -- Clive D.W. Feather | Home: Tel: +44 20 8495 6138 (work) | Web: http://www.davros.org Fax: +44 870 051 9937 | Work: Please reply to the Reply-To address, which is: |