"Hidden" Plans for TWO new Terminals at Heathrow.
 

NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
"NM" wrote in message
...
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
tim..... wrote:
"NM" wrote in message
...
tim..... wrote:
"allan tracy"
wrote in message
oups.com...
Bit bloody useless for all of the passengers
living in the M4 corridor for whom Heathrow is
usefully situated.
Ask yourself which came first Heathrow Airport
or the M4 corridor and its passengers that live
there.
Hum, when was the mainline railway built?

Relevence?
Why would they build a mainline railway to an area
with no people in it.

tim


To (in this case) to get to Bristol and the
transatlantic shipping trade, same applies to
Southamppton and Plymouth. Swindon was just a
convienient place to put a workshop, railway more or
lesss followed the track of the Bath Road an ancient
track and a turnpike.
Not totally acurate. What became the present mainline
railway was initially proposed by Bristolians to move
their goods to London and the railway doesn't follow
the Bath Road.
Then they must have moved it since I was a kid.
Nope, try looking at a map. (Which is not to say that
the two don't get close and even cross in one or two
places between London and Reading.)
Which is what I said in the first place.
You said, "railway more or lesss followed the track of
the Bath Road an ancient track and a turnpike" indicates
that the two are close to each other for most or all of
the distance, they're not. Except for a couple of
locations, they don't even get close.
More or less, all the implications are your fantasies.
That's about as close to an apology as I'm likely to get
from you so I suppose it will have to suffice.


Whatever, I see it more as ask a silly question, get a silly
answer, perhaps you should modify your interrogtion
technique,
Try checking your facts rather than relying on seventy-five
year old memories of a limited area.


OK, if you try not to jump in with an irrelevent question
soley posed with trolling in mind.
I didn't pose a question. You made the troling comment and now
you can't handle it when found out.
Handle it? You are taking the ****, do you think I give a flying
**** what you think.
Now you're just wriggling. What I think doesn't matter. The fact
that you have got you knickers in a twist and are wriggling
around trying straighten them says enough.


Dream on.
It's you who's dreaming, or is it a nightmare?

Have a good wriggle.


As I said, dream on, you appear to be enjoying it.

I'm enjoying seeing you wriggle.


dream on

Wriggly wriggly.

"Hidden" Plans for TWO new Terminals at Heathrow.
 

Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
"NM" wrote in message
...
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
tim..... wrote:
"NM" wrote in message
...
tim..... wrote:
"allan tracy"
wrote in message
oups.com...
Bit bloody useless for all of the passengers
living in the M4 corridor for whom Heathrow is
usefully situated.
Ask yourself which came first Heathrow Airport
or the M4 corridor and its passengers that live
there.
Hum, when was the mainline railway built?

Relevence?
Why would they build a mainline railway to an area
with no people in it.

tim


To (in this case) to get to Bristol and the
transatlantic shipping trade, same applies to
Southamppton and Plymouth. Swindon was just a
convienient place to put a workshop, railway more or
lesss followed the track of the Bath Road an ancient
track and a turnpike.
Not totally acurate. What became the present mainline
railway was initially proposed by Bristolians to move
their goods to London and the railway doesn't follow
the Bath Road.
Then they must have moved it since I was a kid.
Nope, try looking at a map. (Which is not to say that
the two don't get close and even cross in one or two
places between London and Reading.)
Which is what I said in the first place.
You said, "railway more or lesss followed the track of
the Bath Road an ancient track and a turnpike" indicates
that the two are close to each other for most or all of
the distance, they're not. Except for a couple of
locations, they don't even get close.
More or less, all the implications are your fantasies.
That's about as close to an apology as I'm likely to get
from you so I suppose it will have to suffice.


Whatever, I see it more as ask a silly question, get a silly
answer, perhaps you should modify your interrogtion
technique,
Try checking your facts rather than relying on seventy-five
year old memories of a limited area.


OK, if you try not to jump in with an irrelevent question
soley posed with trolling in mind.
I didn't pose a question. You made the troling comment and now
you can't handle it when found out.
Handle it? You are taking the ****, do you think I give a flying
**** what you think.
Now you're just wriggling. What I think doesn't matter. The fact
that you have got you knickers in a twist and are wriggling
around trying straighten them says enough.


Dream on.
It's you who's dreaming, or is it a nightmare?

Have a good wriggle.


As I said, dream on, you appear to be enjoying it.
I'm enjoying seeing you wriggle.


dream on

Wriggly wriggly.


Dream on

"Hidden" Plans for TWO new Terminals at Heathrow.
 

NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
"NM" wrote in message
...
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
tim..... wrote:
"NM" wrote in message
...
tim..... wrote:
"allan tracy"
wrote in message
oups.com...
Bit bloody useless for all of the passengers
living in the M4 corridor for whom Heathrow
is usefully situated.
Ask yourself which came first Heathrow Airport
or the M4 corridor and its passengers that
live there.
Hum, when was the mainline railway built?

Relevence?
Why would they build a mainline railway to an
area with no people in it.

tim


To (in this case) to get to Bristol and the
transatlantic shipping trade, same applies to
Southamppton and Plymouth. Swindon was just a
convienient place to put a workshop, railway more
or lesss followed the track of the Bath Road an
ancient track and a turnpike.
Not totally acurate. What became the present
mainline railway was initially proposed by
Bristolians to move their goods to London and the
railway doesn't follow the Bath Road.
Then they must have moved it since I was a kid.
Nope, try looking at a map. (Which is not to say that
the two don't get close and even cross in one or two
places between London and Reading.)
Which is what I said in the first place.
You said, "railway more or lesss followed the track of
the Bath Road an ancient track and a turnpike"
indicates that the two are close to each other for
most or all of the distance, they're not. Except for a
couple of locations, they don't even get close.
More or less, all the implications are your fantasies.
That's about as close to an apology as I'm likely to get
from you so I suppose it will have to suffice.


Whatever, I see it more as ask a silly question, get a
silly answer, perhaps you should modify your interrogtion
technique,
Try checking your facts rather than relying on seventy-five
year old memories of a limited area.


OK, if you try not to jump in with an irrelevent question
soley posed with trolling in mind.
I didn't pose a question. You made the troling comment and
now you can't handle it when found out.
Handle it? You are taking the ****, do you think I give a
flying **** what you think.
Now you're just wriggling. What I think doesn't matter. The
fact that you have got you knickers in a twist and are
wriggling around trying straighten them says enough.


Dream on.
It's you who's dreaming, or is it a nightmare?

Have a good wriggle.


As I said, dream on, you appear to be enjoying it.
I'm enjoying seeing you wriggle.


dream on

Wriggly wriggly.


Dream on

Wriggly wriggly.

"Hidden" Plans for TWO new Terminals at Heathrow.
 

Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
"NM" wrote in message
...
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
tim..... wrote:
"NM" wrote in message
...
tim..... wrote:
"allan tracy"
wrote in message
oups.com...
Bit bloody useless for all of the passengers
living in the M4 corridor for whom Heathrow
is usefully situated.
Ask yourself which came first Heathrow Airport
or the M4 corridor and its passengers that
live there.
Hum, when was the mainline railway built?

Relevence?
Why would they build a mainline railway to an
area with no people in it.

tim


To (in this case) to get to Bristol and the
transatlantic shipping trade, same applies to
Southamppton and Plymouth. Swindon was just a
convienient place to put a workshop, railway more
or lesss followed the track of the Bath Road an
ancient track and a turnpike.
Not totally acurate. What became the present
mainline railway was initially proposed by
Bristolians to move their goods to London and the
railway doesn't follow the Bath Road.
Then they must have moved it since I was a kid.
Nope, try looking at a map. (Which is not to say that
the two don't get close and even cross in one or two
places between London and Reading.)
Which is what I said in the first place.
You said, "railway more or lesss followed the track of
the Bath Road an ancient track and a turnpike"
indicates that the two are close to each other for
most or all of the distance, they're not. Except for a
couple of locations, they don't even get close.
More or less, all the implications are your fantasies.
That's about as close to an apology as I'm likely to get
from you so I suppose it will have to suffice.


Whatever, I see it more as ask a silly question, get a
silly answer, perhaps you should modify your interrogtion
technique,
Try checking your facts rather than relying on seventy-five
year old memories of a limited area.


OK, if you try not to jump in with an irrelevent question
soley posed with trolling in mind.
I didn't pose a question. You made the troling comment and
now you can't handle it when found out.
Handle it? You are taking the ****, do you think I give a
flying **** what you think.
Now you're just wriggling. What I think doesn't matter. The
fact that you have got you knickers in a twist and are
wriggling around trying straighten them says enough.


Dream on.
It's you who's dreaming, or is it a nightmare?

Have a good wriggle.


As I said, dream on, you appear to be enjoying it.
I'm enjoying seeing you wriggle.


dream on
Wriggly wriggly.


Dream on

Wriggly wriggly.


Still dreaming, don't worry you'll wake up soon and realise what a
complete prat you are making of yourself.

"Hidden" Plans for TWO new Terminals at Heathrow.
 

NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
"NM" wrote in message
...
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
tim..... wrote:
"NM" wrote in message
...
tim..... wrote:
"allan tracy"
wrote in message
oups.com...
Bit bloody useless for all of the
passengers living in the M4 corridor for
whom Heathrow is usefully situated.
Ask yourself which came first Heathrow
Airport or the M4 corridor and its
passengers that live there.
Hum, when was the mainline railway built?

Relevence?
Why would they build a mainline railway to an
area with no people in it.

tim


To (in this case) to get to Bristol and the
transatlantic shipping trade, same applies to
Southamppton and Plymouth. Swindon was just a
convienient place to put a workshop, railway
more or lesss followed the track of the Bath
Road an ancient track and a turnpike.
Not totally acurate. What became the present
mainline railway was initially proposed by
Bristolians to move their goods to London and the
railway doesn't follow the Bath Road.
Then they must have moved it since I was a kid.
Nope, try looking at a map. (Which is not to say
that the two don't get close and even cross in one
or two places between London and Reading.)
Which is what I said in the first place.
You said, "railway more or lesss followed the track
of the Bath Road an ancient track and a turnpike"
indicates that the two are close to each other for
most or all of the distance, they're not. Except for
a couple of locations, they don't even get close.
More or less, all the implications are your fantasies.
That's about as close to an apology as I'm likely to
get from you so I suppose it will have to suffice.


Whatever, I see it more as ask a silly question, get a
silly answer, perhaps you should modify your
interrogtion technique,
Try checking your facts rather than relying on
seventy-five year old memories of a limited area.


OK, if you try not to jump in with an irrelevent question
soley posed with trolling in mind.
I didn't pose a question. You made the troling comment and
now you can't handle it when found out.
Handle it? You are taking the ****, do you think I give a
flying **** what you think.
Now you're just wriggling. What I think doesn't matter. The
fact that you have got you knickers in a twist and are
wriggling around trying straighten them says enough.


Dream on.
It's you who's dreaming, or is it a nightmare?

Have a good wriggle.


As I said, dream on, you appear to be enjoying it.
I'm enjoying seeing you wriggle.


dream on
Wriggly wriggly.


Dream on

Wriggly wriggly.


Still dreaming, don't worry you'll wake up soon and realise what a
complete prat you are making of yourself.

Wriggly wriggly

"Hidden" Plans for TWO new Terminals at Heathrow.
 

Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
"NM" wrote in message
...
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
tim..... wrote:
"NM" wrote in message
...
tim..... wrote:
"allan tracy"
wrote in message
oups.com...
Bit bloody useless for all of the
passengers living in the M4 corridor for
whom Heathrow is usefully situated.
Ask yourself which came first Heathrow
Airport or the M4 corridor and its
passengers that live there.
Hum, when was the mainline railway built?

Relevence?
Why would they build a mainline railway to an
area with no people in it.

tim


To (in this case) to get to Bristol and the
transatlantic shipping trade, same applies to
Southamppton and Plymouth. Swindon was just a
convienient place to put a workshop, railway
more or lesss followed the track of the Bath
Road an ancient track and a turnpike.
Not totally acurate. What became the present
mainline railway was initially proposed by
Bristolians to move their goods to London and the
railway doesn't follow the Bath Road.
Then they must have moved it since I was a kid.
Nope, try looking at a map. (Which is not to say
that the two don't get close and even cross in one
or two places between London and Reading.)
Which is what I said in the first place.
You said, "railway more or lesss followed the track
of the Bath Road an ancient track and a turnpike"
indicates that the two are close to each other for
most or all of the distance, they're not. Except for
a couple of locations, they don't even get close.
More or less, all the implications are your fantasies.
That's about as close to an apology as I'm likely to
get from you so I suppose it will have to suffice.


Whatever, I see it more as ask a silly question, get a
silly answer, perhaps you should modify your
interrogtion technique,
Try checking your facts rather than relying on
seventy-five year old memories of a limited area.


OK, if you try not to jump in with an irrelevent question
soley posed with trolling in mind.
I didn't pose a question. You made the troling comment and
now you can't handle it when found out.
Handle it? You are taking the ****, do you think I give a
flying **** what you think.
Now you're just wriggling. What I think doesn't matter. The
fact that you have got you knickers in a twist and are
wriggling around trying straighten them says enough.


Dream on.
It's you who's dreaming, or is it a nightmare?

Have a good wriggle.


As I said, dream on, you appear to be enjoying it.
I'm enjoying seeing you wriggle.


dream on
Wriggly wriggly.


Dream on
Wriggly wriggly.


Still dreaming, don't worry you'll wake up soon and realise what a
complete prat you are making of yourself.

Wriggly wriggly


keep dreaming

"Hidden" Plans for TWO new Terminals at Heathrow.
 

NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
"NM" wrote in message
...
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
tim..... wrote:
"NM" wrote in message
...
tim..... wrote:
"allan tracy"
wrote in
message
oups.com...
Bit bloody useless for all of the
passengers living in the M4 corridor for
whom Heathrow is usefully situated.
Ask yourself which came first Heathrow
Airport or the M4 corridor and its
passengers that live there.
Hum, when was the mainline railway built?

Relevence?
Why would they build a mainline railway to an
area with no people in it.

tim


To (in this case) to get to Bristol and the
transatlantic shipping trade, same applies to
Southamppton and Plymouth. Swindon was just a
convienient place to put a workshop, railway
more or lesss followed the track of the Bath
Road an ancient track and a turnpike.
Not totally acurate. What became the present
mainline railway was initially proposed by
Bristolians to move their goods to London and
the railway doesn't follow the Bath Road.
Then they must have moved it since I was a kid.
Nope, try looking at a map. (Which is not to say
that the two don't get close and even cross in
one or two places between London and Reading.)
Which is what I said in the first place.
You said, "railway more or lesss followed the track
of the Bath Road an ancient track and a turnpike"
indicates that the two are close to each other for
most or all of the distance, they're not. Except
for a couple of locations, they don't even get
close.
More or less, all the implications are your
fantasies.
That's about as close to an apology as I'm likely to
get from you so I suppose it will have to suffice.


Whatever, I see it more as ask a silly question, get a
silly answer, perhaps you should modify your
interrogtion technique,
Try checking your facts rather than relying on
seventy-five year old memories of a limited area.


OK, if you try not to jump in with an irrelevent
question soley posed with trolling in mind.
I didn't pose a question. You made the troling comment
and now you can't handle it when found out.
Handle it? You are taking the ****, do you think I give a
flying **** what you think.
Now you're just wriggling. What I think doesn't matter. The
fact that you have got you knickers in a twist and are
wriggling around trying straighten them says enough.


Dream on.
It's you who's dreaming, or is it a nightmare?

Have a good wriggle.


As I said, dream on, you appear to be enjoying it.
I'm enjoying seeing you wriggle.


dream on
Wriggly wriggly.


Dream on
Wriggly wriggly.


Still dreaming, don't worry you'll wake up soon and realise what a
complete prat you are making of yourself.

Wriggly wriggly


keep dreaming

Wriggle wriggle

"Hidden" Plans for TWO new Terminals at Heathrow.
 

Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
"NM" wrote in message
...
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
tim..... wrote:
"NM" wrote in message
...
tim..... wrote:
"allan tracy"
wrote in
message
oups.com...
Bit bloody useless for all of the
passengers living in the M4 corridor for
whom Heathrow is usefully situated.
Ask yourself which came first Heathrow
Airport or the M4 corridor and its
passengers that live there.
Hum, when was the mainline railway built?

Relevence?
Why would they build a mainline railway to an
area with no people in it.

tim


To (in this case) to get to Bristol and the
transatlantic shipping trade, same applies to
Southamppton and Plymouth. Swindon was just a
convienient place to put a workshop, railway
more or lesss followed the track of the Bath
Road an ancient track and a turnpike.
Not totally acurate. What became the present
mainline railway was initially proposed by
Bristolians to move their goods to London and
the railway doesn't follow the Bath Road.
Then they must have moved it since I was a kid.
Nope, try looking at a map. (Which is not to say
that the two don't get close and even cross in
one or two places between London and Reading.)
Which is what I said in the first place.
You said, "railway more or lesss followed the track
of the Bath Road an ancient track and a turnpike"
indicates that the two are close to each other for
most or all of the distance, they're not. Except
for a couple of locations, they don't even get
close.
More or less, all the implications are your
fantasies.
That's about as close to an apology as I'm likely to
get from you so I suppose it will have to suffice.


Whatever, I see it more as ask a silly question, get a
silly answer, perhaps you should modify your
interrogtion technique,
Try checking your facts rather than relying on
seventy-five year old memories of a limited area.


OK, if you try not to jump in with an irrelevent
question soley posed with trolling in mind.
I didn't pose a question. You made the troling comment
and now you can't handle it when found out.
Handle it? You are taking the ****, do you think I give a
flying **** what you think.
Now you're just wriggling. What I think doesn't matter. The
fact that you have got you knickers in a twist and are
wriggling around trying straighten them says enough.


Dream on.
It's you who's dreaming, or is it a nightmare?

Have a good wriggle.


As I said, dream on, you appear to be enjoying it.
I'm enjoying seeing you wriggle.


dream on
Wriggly wriggly.


Dream on
Wriggly wriggly.


Still dreaming, don't worry you'll wake up soon and realise what a
complete prat you are making of yourself.
Wriggly wriggly


keep dreaming

Wriggle wriggle


You still here dreaming away, I've been out and done the shopping whilst
you have been having your childish little paddy.

Dream on

"Hidden" Plans for TWO new Terminals at Heathrow.
 

NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
"NM" wrote in message
...
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
tim..... wrote:
"NM" wrote in
message
...
tim..... wrote:
"allan tracy"
wrote in
message
oups.com...
Bit bloody useless for all of the
passengers living in the M4 corridor
for whom Heathrow is usefully situated.
Ask yourself which came first Heathrow
Airport or the M4 corridor and its
passengers that live there.
Hum, when was the mainline railway built?

Relevence?
Why would they build a mainline railway to
an area with no people in it.

tim


To (in this case) to get to Bristol and the
transatlantic shipping trade, same applies
to Southamppton and Plymouth. Swindon was
just a convienient place to put a workshop,
railway more or lesss followed the track of
the Bath Road an ancient track and a
turnpike.
Not totally acurate. What became the present
mainline railway was initially proposed by
Bristolians to move their goods to London and
the railway doesn't follow the Bath Road.
Then they must have moved it since I was a
kid.
Nope, try looking at a map. (Which is not to
say that the two don't get close and even
cross in one or two places between London and
Reading.)
Which is what I said in the first place.
You said, "railway more or lesss followed the
track of the Bath Road an ancient track and a
turnpike" indicates that the two are close to
each other for most or all of the distance,
they're not. Except for a couple of locations,
they don't even get close.
More or less, all the implications are your
fantasies.
That's about as close to an apology as I'm likely
to get from you so I suppose it will have to
suffice.
Whatever, I see it more as ask a silly question,
get a silly answer, perhaps you should modify your
interrogtion technique,
Try checking your facts rather than relying on
seventy-five year old memories of a limited area.


OK, if you try not to jump in with an irrelevent
question soley posed with trolling in mind.
I didn't pose a question. You made the troling comment
and now you can't handle it when found out.
Handle it? You are taking the ****, do you think I give
a flying **** what you think.
Now you're just wriggling. What I think doesn't matter.
The fact that you have got you knickers in a twist and
are wriggling around trying straighten them says enough.


Dream on.
It's you who's dreaming, or is it a nightmare?

Have a good wriggle.


As I said, dream on, you appear to be enjoying it.
I'm enjoying seeing you wriggle.


dream on
Wriggly wriggly.


Dream on
Wriggly wriggly.


Still dreaming, don't worry you'll wake up soon and realise what a
complete prat you are making of yourself.
Wriggly wriggly


keep dreaming

Wriggle wriggle


You still here dreaming away, I've been out and done the shopping
whilst you have been having your childish little paddy.

Good for you, but it's not me having the paddy. If it were you wouldn't keep
responding. (BTW - Some people are sufficiently organised that they don't
need to go shopping on the busiest day of the week.)


Dream on

Wriggle wriggle

"Hidden" Plans for TWO new Terminals at Heathrow.
 

NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:

NM wrote:

Brimstone wrote:

NM wrote:

Brimstone wrote:

NM wrote:

Brimstone wrote:

NM wrote:

Brimstone wrote:

NM wrote:

Brimstone wrote:

NM wrote:

Brimstone wrote:

"NM" wrote in message
...

Brimstone wrote:

NM wrote:

Brimstone wrote:

NM wrote:

Brimstone wrote:

NM wrote:

Brimstone wrote:

NM wrote:

Brimstone wrote:

NM wrote:

Brimstone wrote:

NM wrote:

tim..... wrote:

"NM" wrote in message
...


tim..... wrote:

"allan tracy"
wrote in
message
oups.com...


Bit bloody useless for all of the
passengers living in the M4 corridor for
whom Heathrow is usefully situated.

Ask yourself which came first Heathrow
Airport or the M4 corridor and its
passengers that live there.

Hum, when was the mainline railway built?

Relevence?

Why would they build a mainline railway to an
area with no people in it.

tim


To (in this case) to get to Bristol and the
transatlantic shipping trade, same applies to
Southamppton and Plymouth. Swindon was just a
convienient place to put a workshop, railway
more or lesss followed the track of the Bath
Road an ancient track and a turnpike.

Not totally acurate. What became the present
mainline railway was initially proposed by
Bristolians to move their goods to London and
the railway doesn't follow the Bath Road.

Then they must have moved it since I was a kid.

Nope, try looking at a map. (Which is not to say
that the two don't get close and even cross in
one or two places between London and Reading.)

Which is what I said in the first place.

You said, "railway more or lesss followed the track
of the Bath Road an ancient track and a turnpike"
indicates that the two are close to each other for
most or all of the distance, they're not. Except
for a couple of locations, they don't even get
close.

More or less, all the implications are your
fantasies.

That's about as close to an apology as I'm likely to
get from you so I suppose it will have to suffice.


Whatever, I see it more as ask a silly question, get a
silly answer, perhaps you should modify your
interrogtion technique,

Try checking your facts rather than relying on
seventy-five year old memories of a limited area.


OK, if you try not to jump in with an irrelevent
question soley posed with trolling in mind.

I didn't pose a question. You made the troling comment
and now you can't handle it when found out.

Handle it? You are taking the ****, do you think I give a
flying **** what you think.

Now you're just wriggling. What I think doesn't matter. The
fact that you have got you knickers in a twist and are
wriggling around trying straighten them says enough.


Dream on.

It's you who's dreaming, or is it a nightmare?

Have a good wriggle.


As I said, dream on, you appear to be enjoying it.

I'm enjoying seeing you wriggle.


dream on

Wriggly wriggly.


Dream on

Wriggly wriggly.


Still dreaming, don't worry you'll wake up soon and realise what a
complete prat you are making of yourself.

Wriggly wriggly


keep dreaming


Wriggle wriggle

You still here dreaming away, I've been out and done the shopping whilst
you have been having your childish little paddy.

Dream on

Hey - you two are making a really nice pattern on Thunderbird.

"Hidden" Plans for TWO new Terminals at Heathrow.
 

JNugent wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:

NM wrote:

Brimstone wrote:

NM wrote:

Brimstone wrote:

NM wrote:

Brimstone wrote:

NM wrote:

Brimstone wrote:

NM wrote:

Brimstone wrote:

NM wrote:

Brimstone wrote:

"NM" wrote in message
...

Brimstone wrote:

NM wrote:

Brimstone wrote:

NM wrote:

Brimstone wrote:

NM wrote:

Brimstone wrote:

NM wrote:

Brimstone wrote:

NM wrote:

Brimstone wrote:

NM wrote:

tim..... wrote:

"NM" wrote in message
...


tim..... wrote:

"allan tracy"
wrote in
message
oups.com...


Bit bloody useless for all of the
passengers living in the M4 corridor for
whom Heathrow is usefully situated.

Ask yourself which came first Heathrow
Airport or the M4 corridor and its
passengers that live there.

Hum, when was the mainline railway built?

Relevence?

Why would they build a mainline railway to an
area with no people in it.

tim


To (in this case) to get to Bristol and the
transatlantic shipping trade, same applies to
Southamppton and Plymouth. Swindon was just a
convienient place to put a workshop, railway
more or lesss followed the track of the Bath
Road an ancient track and a turnpike.

Not totally acurate. What became the present
mainline railway was initially proposed by
Bristolians to move their goods to London and
the railway doesn't follow the Bath Road.

Then they must have moved it since I was a kid.

Nope, try looking at a map. (Which is not to say
that the two don't get close and even cross in
one or two places between London and Reading.)

Which is what I said in the first place.

You said, "railway more or lesss followed the track
of the Bath Road an ancient track and a turnpike"
indicates that the two are close to each other for
most or all of the distance, they're not. Except
for a couple of locations, they don't even get
close.

More or less, all the implications are your
fantasies.

That's about as close to an apology as I'm likely to
get from you so I suppose it will have to suffice.


Whatever, I see it more as ask a silly question, get a
silly answer, perhaps you should modify your
interrogtion technique,

Try checking your facts rather than relying on
seventy-five year old memories of a limited area.


OK, if you try not to jump in with an irrelevent
question soley posed with trolling in mind.

I didn't pose a question. You made the troling comment
and now you can't handle it when found out.

Handle it? You are taking the ****, do you think I give a
flying **** what you think.

Now you're just wriggling. What I think doesn't matter. The
fact that you have got you knickers in a twist and are
wriggling around trying straighten them says enough.


Dream on.

It's you who's dreaming, or is it a nightmare?

Have a good wriggle.


As I said, dream on, you appear to be enjoying it.

I'm enjoying seeing you wriggle.


dream on

Wriggly wriggly.


Dream on

Wriggly wriggly.


Still dreaming, don't worry you'll wake up soon and realise what a
complete prat you are making of yourself.

Wriggly wriggly


keep dreaming


Wriggle wriggle

You still here dreaming away, I've been out and done the shopping
whilst you have been having your childish little paddy.

Dream on

Hey - you two are making a really nice pattern on Thunderbird.

Yeah I noticed that as well, 'aint got time now, back to work this week.

"Hidden" Plans for TWO new Terminals at Heathrow.
 

On 18 Aug, 14:32, NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
"NM" wrote in message
...
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
tim..... wrote:
"NM" wrote in message
news:N61xi.9938$mZ5.137 ...
tim..... wrote:
"allan tracy"
wrote in
message
news:1187283150.19657 ...
Bit bloody useless for all of the
passengers living in the M4 corridor for
whom Heathrow is usefully situated.
Ask yourself which came first Heathrow
Airport or the M4 corridor and its
passengers that live there.
Hum, when was the mainline railway built?

Relevence?
Why would they build a mainline railway to an
area with no people in it.

tim

To (in this case) to get to Bristol and the
transatlantic shipping trade, same applies to
Southamppton and Plymouth. Swindon was just a
convienient place to put a workshop, railway
more or lesss followed the track of the Bath
Road an ancient track and a turnpike.
Not totally acurate. What became the present
mainline railway was initially proposed by
Bristolians to move their goods to London and
the railway doesn't follow the Bath Road.
Then they must have moved it since I was a kid.
Nope, try looking at a map. (Which is not to say
that the two don't get close and even cross in
one or two places between London and Reading.)
Which is what I said in the first place.
You said, "railway more or lesss followed the track
of the Bath Road an ancient track and a turnpike"
indicates that the two are close to each other for
most or all of the distance, they're not. Except
for a couple of locations, they don't even get
close.
More or less, all the implications are your
fantasies.
That's about as close to an apology as I'm likely to
get from you so I suppose it will have to suffice.

Whatever, I see it more as ask a silly question, get a
silly answer, perhaps you should modify your
interrogtion technique,
Try checking your facts rather than relying on
seventy-five year old memories of a limited area.

OK, if you try not to jump in with an irrelevent
question soley posed with trolling in mind.
I didn't pose a question. You made the troling comment
and now you can't handle it when found out.
Handle it? You are taking the ****, do you think I give a
flying **** what you think.
Now you're just wriggling. What I think doesn't matter. The
fact that you have got you knickers in a twist and are
wriggling around trying straighten them says enough.

Dream on.
It's you who's dreaming, or is it a nightmare?

Have a good wriggle.

As I said, dream on, you appear to be enjoying it.
I'm enjoying seeing you wriggle.

dream on
Wriggly wriggly.

Dream on
Wriggly wriggly.

Still dreaming, don't worry you'll wake up soon and realise what a
complete prat you are making of yourself.
Wriggly wriggly

keep dreaming

Wriggle wriggle

You still here dreaming away, I've been out and done the shopping whilst
you have been having your childish little paddy.

Dream on

I had a shock the other day at my local Tesco, it seemed to be full of
screaming, underfeet kids! Obviously I picked the wrong day during
schoolsout. I wonder if they were all buying imported food? Talking of
food, I hear that the Chinese have rejected a shipment of US soya, in
retaliation no doubt.

--
UK Radical Campaigns
www.zing.icom43.net
One man's democracy is another man's regime.

"Hidden" Plans for TWO new Terminals at Heathrow.
 

Doug wrote:
On 18 Aug, 14:32, NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
"NM" wrote in message
...
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:
NM wrote:
tim..... wrote:
"NM" wrote in message
...
tim..... wrote:
"allan tracy"
wrote in
message
oups.com...
Bit bloody useless for all of the
passengers living in the M4 corridor for
whom Heathrow is usefully situated.
Ask yourself which came first Heathrow
Airport or the M4 corridor and its
passengers that live there.
Hum, when was the mainline railway built?
Relevence?
Why would they build a mainline railway to an
area with no people in it.
tim
To (in this case) to get to Bristol and the
transatlantic shipping trade, same applies to
Southamppton and Plymouth. Swindon was just a
convienient place to put a workshop, railway
more or lesss followed the track of the Bath
Road an ancient track and a turnpike.
Not totally acurate. What became the present
mainline railway was initially proposed by
Bristolians to move their goods to London and
the railway doesn't follow the Bath Road.
Then they must have moved it since I was a kid.
Nope, try looking at a map. (Which is not to say
that the two don't get close and even cross in
one or two places between London and Reading.)
Which is what I said in the first place.
You said, "railway more or lesss followed the track
of the Bath Road an ancient track and a turnpike"
indicates that the two are close to each other for
most or all of the distance, they're not. Except
for a couple of locations, they don't even get
close.
More or less, all the implications are your
fantasies.
That's about as close to an apology as I'm likely to
get from you so I suppose it will have to suffice.
Whatever, I see it more as ask a silly question, get a
silly answer, perhaps you should modify your
interrogtion technique,
Try checking your facts rather than relying on
seventy-five year old memories of a limited area.
OK, if you try not to jump in with an irrelevent
question soley posed with trolling in mind.
I didn't pose a question. You made the troling comment
and now you can't handle it when found out.
Handle it? You are taking the ****, do you think I give a
flying **** what you think.
Now you're just wriggling. What I think doesn't matter. The
fact that you have got you knickers in a twist and are
wriggling around trying straighten them says enough.
Dream on.
It's you who's dreaming, or is it a nightmare?
Have a good wriggle.
As I said, dream on, you appear to be enjoying it.
I'm enjoying seeing you wriggle.
dream on
Wriggly wriggly.
Dream on
Wriggly wriggly.
Still dreaming, don't worry you'll wake up soon and realise what a
complete prat you are making of yourself.
Wriggly wriggly
keep dreaming
Wriggle wriggle
You still here dreaming away, I've been out and done the shopping whilst
you have been having your childish little paddy.

Dream on

I had a shock the other day at my local Tesco, it seemed to be full of
screaming, underfeet kids! Obviously I picked the wrong day during
schoolsout. I wonder if they were all buying imported food? Talking of
food, I hear that the Chinese have rejected a shipment of US soya, in
retaliation no doubt.

--
UK Radical Campaigns
www.zing.icom43.net
One man's democracy is another man's regime.


Well that sums up an awful lot, doesn't it. You're the one stupid enough
to feed the Tesco monster

http://piv.pivpiv.dk/

--
Moving things in still pictures!

"Hidden" Plans for TWO new Terminals at Heathrow.
 

Doug ) gurgled happily, sounding much like they were
saying :

my local Tesco

Why on earth would you choose to go to Tesco? Surely that particular chain,
of all of them, is the one that is most diagonally opposed to your
particular political beliefs and views?

I wonder if they were all buying imported food?

Probably.

But I'll bet they aren't hypocritical enough to moan long and loud about
frivolous hypermobility killing the planet whilst they do it.

"Hidden" Plans for TWO new Terminals at Heathrow.
 

In article .com,
Doug says...

I had a shock the other day at my local Tesco, it seemed to be full of
screaming, underfeet kids! Obviously I picked the wrong day during
schoolsout. I wonder if they were all buying imported food?

Like you, probably.

"Hidden" Plans for TWO new Terminals at Heathrow.
 

"Tom Anderson" wrote in message
.li...
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007, tim..... wrote:


"Dogpoop" wrote in message
...
CJB wrote:

PROPOSALS to build two new terminals at Heathrow are being considered
as part of plans to increase the airport's capacity, government
documents have revealed, writes Jonathon Carr-Brown.

Maybe someone should publish these 'hidden' plans then.

Or come up with a viable alternative.

Developing Stansted into a 4 runway airport with a high speed train
connection (south, north and sast) and closing LHR completely.

Hey! Why Stansted? Why not Luton - much better placed for the transport
links. Run a rail spur Stevenage - Luton - Leighton Buzzard and you've got
the WCML, MML and ECML all linked in. If the Oxford - Cambridge line comes
back to life, there's an easy link to the GWML too.

I know that the locals won't like this, but there are far less of them.

How about this airport on an artificial island in the Thames estuary,
then? Even fewer NIMBYs!


THINK OF ALL THE SEAGULLS!!!!

"Hidden" Plans for TWO new Terminals at Heathrow.
 

"Tom Anderson" wrote in message
h.li...
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007, tim..... wrote:

"Tom Anderson" wrote in message
.li...
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007, tim..... wrote:

"Dogpoop" wrote in message
...
CJB wrote:

PROPOSALS to build two new terminals at Heathrow are being considered
as part of plans to increase the airport's capacity, government
documents have revealed, writes Jonathon Carr-Brown.

Maybe someone should publish these 'hidden' plans then.

Or come up with a viable alternative.

Developing Stansted into a 4 runway airport with a high speed train
connection (south, north and sast) and closing LHR completely.

Hey! Why Stansted?

Because Stansted is the one with the least people under the potential
flight path(s)

Why not Luton

Because, like LHR, it's surrounded by a town

Have you ever heard of a place called Bishop's Stortford?

Nope. Is it anything to do with Bishops Waltham?

"Hidden" Plans for TWO new Terminals at Heathrow.
 

"Brimstone" wrote in message
...
NM wrote:
tim..... wrote:
"NM" wrote in message
...
tim..... wrote:
"allan tracy" wrote in message
oups.com...
Bit bloody useless for all of the passengers living in the M4
corridor for whom Heathrow is usefully situated.

Ask yourself which came first Heathrow Airport or the M4 corridor
and its passengers that live there.
Hum, when was the mainline railway built?

Relevence?

Why would they build a mainline railway to an area with
no people in it.

tim


To (in this case) to get to Bristol and the transatlantic shipping
trade, same applies to Southamppton and Plymouth. Swindon was just a
convienient place to put a workshop, railway more or lesss followed
the track of the Bath Road an ancient track and a turnpike.

Not totally acurate. What became the present mainline railway was
initially proposed by Bristolians to move their goods to London and the
railway doesn't follow the Bath Road.

Correct. It follows the levellest route they could find.

"Hidden" Plans for TWO new Terminals at Heathrow.
 

"NM" wrote in message
...
JNugent wrote:
NM wrote:
Brimstone wrote:

NM wrote:

Brimstone wrote:

NM wrote:

Brimstone wrote:

NM wrote:

Brimstone wrote:

NM wrote:

Brimstone wrote:

NM wrote:

Brimstone wrote:

NM wrote:

Brimstone wrote:

"NM" wrote in message
...

Brimstone wrote:

NM wrote:

Brimstone wrote:

NM wrote:

Brimstone wrote:

NM wrote:

Brimstone wrote:

NM wrote:

Brimstone wrote:

NM wrote:

Brimstone wrote:

NM wrote:

tim..... wrote:

"NM" wrote in message
...

tim..... wrote:

"allan tracy"
wrote in
message
oups.com...

Bit bloody useless for all of the
passengers living in the M4 corridor for
whom Heathrow is usefully situated.

Ask yourself which came first Heathrow
Airport or the M4 corridor and its
passengers that live there.

Hum, when was the mainline railway built?

Relevence?

Why would they build a mainline railway to an
area with no people in it.

tim


To (in this case) to get to Bristol and the
transatlantic shipping trade, same applies to
Southamppton and Plymouth. Swindon was just a
convienient place to put a workshop, railway
more or lesss followed the track of the Bath
Road an ancient track and a turnpike.

Not totally acurate. What became the present
mainline railway was initially proposed by
Bristolians to move their goods to London and
the railway doesn't follow the Bath Road.

Then they must have moved it since I was a kid.

Nope, try looking at a map. (Which is not to say
that the two don't get close and even cross in
one or two places between London and Reading.)

Which is what I said in the first place.

You said, "railway more or lesss followed the track
of the Bath Road an ancient track and a turnpike"
indicates that the two are close to each other for
most or all of the distance, they're not. Except
for a couple of locations, they don't even get
close.

More or less, all the implications are your
fantasies.

That's about as close to an apology as I'm likely to
get from you so I suppose it will have to suffice.


Whatever, I see it more as ask a silly question, get a
silly answer, perhaps you should modify your
interrogtion technique,

Try checking your facts rather than relying on
seventy-five year old memories of a limited area.


OK, if you try not to jump in with an irrelevent
question soley posed with trolling in mind.

I didn't pose a question. You made the troling comment
and now you can't handle it when found out.

Handle it? You are taking the ****, do you think I give a
flying **** what you think.

Now you're just wriggling. What I think doesn't matter. The
fact that you have got you knickers in a twist and are
wriggling around trying straighten them says enough.


Dream on.

It's you who's dreaming, or is it a nightmare?

Have a good wriggle.


As I said, dream on, you appear to be enjoying it.

I'm enjoying seeing you wriggle.


dream on

Wriggly wriggly.


Dream on

Wriggly wriggly.


Still dreaming, don't worry you'll wake up soon and realise what a
complete prat you are making of yourself.

Wriggly wriggly


keep dreaming


Wriggle wriggle

You still here dreaming away, I've been out and done the shopping whilst
you have been having your childish little paddy.

Dream on

Hey - you two are making a really nice pattern on Thunderbird.

Someone needs to bang their mice together.
Yeah I noticed that as well, 'aint got time now, back to work this week.

"Hidden" Plans for TWO new Terminals at Heathrow.
 

Ian D Henden wrote:

Have you ever heard of a place called Bishop's Stortford?

Nope. Is it anything to do with Bishops Waltham?

Only that in both places marrying one's sister at the age of 12 appears
to have been compulsory for hundreds of generations.

"Hidden" Plans for TWO new Terminals at Heathrow.
 

Ian D Henden wrote:
"Tom Anderson" wrote in message
h.li...
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007, tim..... wrote:

"Tom Anderson" wrote in message
.li...
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007, tim..... wrote:

"Dogpoop" wrote in message
...
CJB wrote:

PROPOSALS to build two new terminals at Heathrow are being considered
as part of plans to increase the airport's capacity, government
documents have revealed, writes Jonathon Carr-Brown.
Maybe someone should publish these 'hidden' plans then.

Or come up with a viable alternative.
Developing Stansted into a 4 runway airport with a high speed train
connection (south, north and sast) and closing LHR completely.
Hey! Why Stansted?
Because Stansted is the one with the least people under the potential
flight path(s)

Why not Luton
Because, like LHR, it's surrounded by a town
Have you ever heard of a place called Bishop's Stortford?

Nope. Is it anything to do with Bishops Waltham?


Or Bishops Lydeard?

--
Moving things in still pictures!

"Hidden" Plans for TWO new Terminals at Heathrow.
 

Adrian wrote:
Doug ) gurgled happily, sounding much like they were
saying :

my local Tesco

Why on earth would you choose to go to Tesco? Surely that particular chain,
of all of them, is the one that is most diagonally opposed to your
particular political beliefs and views?

I wonder if they were all buying imported food?

Probably.

But I'll bet they aren't hypocritical enough to moan long and loud about
frivolous hypermobility killing the planet whilst they do it.

I also go to Tesco, I just delivered a 44 ft fridge full of processed
dead animal flesh to one of their midlands depots and tomorrow I'm
taking another lot, this time to Wales.

BTW on the way back on the A38 between Exeter and Plymouth I saw one
cyclist, later on the road betwen Saltash and Callington I saw another,
two in one day, The one on the dual carriagway was IMO just risking his
life the next had a comet tail of cars behind him a he flogged up the
hill at about 4 miles and hour, all afraid to cross the double whites to
pass him, there being an awful lot of two way traffic. The old duffer
was about 200 and laden with enough shopping for week, I immediatly
thought, Is Doug on holiday?