About Us

John Rowland · August 27th 07, 11:54 AM posted to uk.transport.london

Colin Rosenstiel wrote:
In article ,
(John Rowland) wrote:

Colin Rosenstiel wrote:
In article
.com,
(sweek) wrote:

More trains and less delays will ease congestion, making this worth
the effort, I think. And there is quite a good chance you will get
a seat when changing at Camden Town, since a lot of other people
will be getting off and changing for the other line, too.

If you arrive at Camden Town on a crush loaded train do you really
think you will be able to change to a train that is not crush
loaded? So if you had a seat before you won't in future in the peak
hour.

That is a bizarre thing to say about a plan to increase the number
of seats per hour.

The people who work at Kings Cross and go home to Edgware will have
a seat after Camden, whereas now they have to stand most of the way
home.

Are you seriously saying that the increase in seats per hour will mean
that there is no standing?

I said no such thing, seriously or flippantly.

I accept that it will be reduced but
eliminated altogether? Hardly.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Oyster fares and Shepherd's Bush London Overground ( Revisited )	[email protected]	London Transport	13	April 23rd 09 02:32 PM
North London Line Revisited	Edward Cowling London UK	London Transport	139	April 2nd 07 10:29 PM
Supermarket transport-oriented film list revisited	Tom Anderson	London Transport	0	April 13th 05 07:31 PM
Another Tube derailment - Camden Town	Nicholas F Hodder	London Transport	32	October 25th 03 11:33 AM
On the topic of Camden Town...	Robert Woolley	London Transport	0	October 19th 03 11:30 AM

Menu

About Us