London Banter

London Banter (https://www.londonbanter.co.uk/forum.php)
-   London Transport (https://www.londonbanter.co.uk/london-transport/)
-   -   Surprised (https://www.londonbanter.co.uk/london-transport/562-surprised.html)

Probably Me August 17th 03 11:21 PM

Surprised
 
On Sun, 17 Aug 2003 21:45:11 +0100, CJG
wrote:

In message , Richard J.
writes
So how would you do that if you were between stations on a tube train
when the power went off?


As quite frankly I would rather wait for a
station assistant with a flashlight than to be hit by a train when the
power comes on.


I'm sure a lot of people on this group feel very differently


Roland Perry August 18th 03 01:09 AM

Surprised
 
In article , CJG NEWSGROUP@ne
wsgroup.no.spam.thanks writes
What amazed me was the swarms of people walking.
The last time I was in New York there was a problem on the subway. And people
just left the station and walked down the road. Literally down the road. Not
even on the pavement. Just a swarm of people walking down the middle of the
room.


I've seen things approaching that outside Kings Cross when the tube
station has been closed (usually a "security alert") in the morning rush
hour.
--
"It used to be that what a writer did was type a bit and then stare out of the
window a bit, type a bit, stare out of the window a bit. Networked computers
make these two activities converge, because now the thing you type on and the
window you stare out of are the same thing" - Douglas Adams 28/1/99.

Steve August 18th 03 01:12 AM

Surprised
 
Probably Me wrote in
:

On Sun, 17 Aug 2003 21:45:11 +0100, CJG
wrote:

In message , Richard J.
writes
So how would you do that if you were between stations on a tube train
when the power went off?


As quite frankly I would rather wait for a
station assistant with a flashlight than to be hit by a train when the
power comes on.


I'm sure a lot of people on this group feel very differently



Which only demonstrates the attitude of LUL staff regarding their passengers.



Justa Lurker August 18th 03 05:16 AM

Surprised
 
It was Sun, 17 Aug 2003 20:55:42 +0100, and CJG
wrote in uk.transport.london:
| And people just left the station and walked down the road.
| Literally down the road. Not even on the pavement.

Ahh, but they were on the pavement ... in NYC that is the road!
(They also drive on parkways and park on driveways. Odd buggers.)

JL
Sidewalks are for normal days


----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

Probably Me August 18th 03 08:37 AM

Surprised
 
On 18 Aug 2003 01:12:56 GMT, Steve wrote:

Probably Me wrote in
:

On Sun, 17 Aug 2003 21:45:11 +0100, CJG
wrote:

In message , Richard J.
writes
So how would you do that if you were between stations on a tube train
when the power went off?

As quite frankly I would rather wait for a
station assistant with a flashlight than to be hit by a train when the
power comes on.


I'm sure a lot of people on this group feel very differently



Which only demonstrates the attitude of LUL staff regarding their passengers.

And exactly what makes you think I am LUL staff? Has it ever crossed
your mind that I am just someone who is ****ed of with the troll CJG?

Ed Crowley August 18th 03 09:23 AM

Surprised
 

"Robin Mayes" wrote in message
...
That there arn't any posts about the power cuts in America and the chaos

it
caused on the New York subway. Perhaps CJD might have realised that us
knuckle-scraping morons might actually be needed to come and rescue him

one
day?


It was surprising that the NY subway doesn't have emergency lighting like LU
does.



CJG August 18th 03 05:51 PM

Surprised
 
In message , Richard J.
writes
So you would in fact rely on LU staff, so why suggest otherwise?


No. I would wait to be told by a reliable source that the power was off
for good before I left the train. And yes that would most likely be a
LU employee. But then there is a small chance it could be policeman or
fireman. But yes I would agree it would most likely be a L.U. Employee
as Im on the Underground. So that would be kinda be expected?
--
CJG

Andrew August 18th 03 06:07 PM

Surprised
 

"Roland Perry" wrote in message
...
In article , CJG NEWSGROUP@ne
wsgroup.no.spam.thanks writes
What amazed me was the swarms of people walking.
The last time I was in New York there was a problem on the subway. And

people
just left the station and walked down the road. Literally down the road.

Not
even on the pavement. Just a swarm of people walking down the middle of

the
room.


I've seen things approaching that outside Kings Cross when the tube
station has been closed (usually a "security alert") in the morning rush
hour.
--


It happened all over central London during the tube stikes a couple of years
ago.

Andrew



Richard J. August 18th 03 07:51 PM

Surprised
 
CJG wrote:
In message , Richard
J. writes
So you would in fact rely on LU staff, so why suggest otherwise?


No. I would wait to be told by a reliable source that the power was
off for good before I left the train. And yes that would most likely
be a LU employee. But then there is a small chance it could be
policeman or fireman. But yes I would agree it would most likely be a
L.U. Employee as Im on the Underground. So that would be kinda be
expected?


Indeed so. But you claimed that "I can assure you if I was on the
underground and the lights and power went out I would be up in the fresh air
way before the station
assistant has found his dusty safety instructions book."

Perhaps you would like to withdraw that rash claim?
--
Richard J.
(to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address)


Mike Bristow August 18th 03 08:00 PM

Surprised
 
In article ,
Matthew Malthouse wrote:
} Either you're missremembering something, or Clive doesn't know about
} a 5 day closure east of Liverpool Street.
}
} Personally, my money's on you missremembering (although proof to
} the contrary would be most interesting!)

If he's misremembering then so am I.


Indeed, it rather looks like CULG is wrong. I'm sure Clive'll
correct it soon enough.

--
Good night little fishey-wishes.... I've counted you, so no
sneaky eating each other.
-- FW (should I worry?)



All times are GMT. The time now is 12:46 PM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk