Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Speaking of Cannon Street, does anyone know exactly what the point of
the current refurbishment is? The ticket office area was refurbished only a few years ago, and it seems pretty stupid to have shut down the M&S and all the other retail units when the station was working perfectly well as it was (nowhere near as crowded or cramped as London Bridge and Charing Cross). I think (as I've said on this group before) that it would be good if they could somehow integrate Cannon Street better into the Bank/ Monument complex. You could have only one District Line station (saving on staff costs), get better interchange with the Northern & Central lines from Cannon Street main line, and call the whole thing "City of London". Patrick |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10 Oct, 14:28, wrote:
Speaking of Cannon Street, does anyone know exactly what the point of the current refurbishment is? The ticket office area was refurbished only a few years ago, and it seems pretty stupid to have shut down the M&S and all the other retail units when the station was working perfectly well as it was (nowhere near as crowded or cramped as London Bridge and Charing Cross). I think (as I've said on this group before) that it would be good if they could somehow integrate Cannon Street better into the Bank/ Monument complex. You could have only one District Line station (saving on staff costs), get better interchange with the Northern & Central lines from Cannon Street main line, and call the whole thing "City of London". It is bizarre the way that the interchange opportunities are currently discouraged. If I was going from the southeast to, say, Oxford Street, I'd always go Cannon Street and Central Line, but people are encouraged to take a dog's leg, which involves a walk from Charing Cross to Trafalgar Sqare (a similar distance to Cannon Street to Bank) just because the stations now have the same name. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10 Oct, 14:58, MIG wrote:
I think (as I've said on this group before) that it would be good if they could somehow integrate Cannon Street better into the Bank/ Monument complex. You could have only one District Line station (saving on staff costs), get better interchange with the Northern & Central lines from Cannon Street main line, and call the whole thing "City of London". It is bizarre the way that the interchange opportunities are currently discouraged. If I was going from the southeast to, say, Oxford Street, I'd always go Cannon Street and Central Line, but people are encouraged to take a dog's leg, which involves a walk from Charing Cross to Trafalgar Sqare (a similar distance to Cannon Street to Bank) just because the stations now have the same name. I've always assumed this was because Cannon Street is overwhelmed in the peak and frequently shut off-peak, whereas Charing Cross is busy most of the time (reflecting their City vs West End status) - it makes more sense to direct interchange passengers to somewhere which can cope with them and where they can go whenever trains are running. -- John Band john at johnband dot org www.johnband.org |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10 Oct, 15:06, John B wrote:
On 10 Oct, 14:58, MIG wrote: I think (as I've said on this group before) that it would be good if they could somehow integrate Cannon Street better into the Bank/ Monument complex. You could have only one District Line station (saving on staff costs), get better interchange with the Northern & Central lines from Cannon Street main line, and call the whole thing "City of London". It is bizarre the way that the interchange opportunities are currently discouraged. If I was going from the southeast to, say, Oxford Street, I'd always go Cannon Street and Central Line, but people are encouraged to take a dog's leg, which involves a walk from Charing Cross to Trafalgar Sqare (a similar distance to Cannon Street to Bank) just because the stations now have the same name. I've always assumed this was because Cannon Street is overwhelmed in the peak and frequently shut off-peak, whereas Charing Cross is busy most of the time (reflecting their City vs West End status) - it makes more sense to direct interchange passengers to somewhere which can cope with them and where they can go whenever trains are running. That could be self-fulfilling. Cannon Street is closed Sundays and late evenings it's true, but direct Central Line access to the whole of Oxford Street suits a lot of daytime activities. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 13 Oct, 09:45, Sky Rider wrote:
wrote: Speaking of Cannon Street, does anyone know exactly what the point of the current refurbishment is? The ticket office area was refurbished only a few years ago, and it seems pretty stupid to have shut down the M&S and all the other retail units when the station was working perfectly well as it was (nowhere near as crowded or cramped as London Bridge and Charing Cross). The project incorporates not just the redevelopment of the NR/LUL station, but also the creation of a new building which will replace the existing monstrosity (i.e. the tower on top of the station). This planning document should give you all the info you need -http://tinyurl.com/2qm86h The existing 1960's office block on top of Cannon Street was constructed so badly that I understand there is at least one floor that is permanently out of use because it is warped somehow. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message . com,
Mizter T writes The existing 1960's office block on top of Cannon Street was constructed so badly that I understand there is at least one floor that is permanently out of use because it is warped somehow. Which should come as no surprise when one remembers that its architect was the infamous John Poulsen. -- Paul Terry |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Paul Terry wrote:
In message . com, Mizter T writes The existing 1960's office block on top of Cannon Street was constructed so badly that I understand there is at least one floor that is permanently out of use because it is warped somehow. Which should come as no surprise when one remembers that its architect was the infamous John Poulsen. The Faroese football player? |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Rowland wrote:
Paul Terry wrote: In message . com, Mizter T writes The existing 1960's office block on top of Cannon Street was constructed so badly that I understand there is at least one floor that is permanently out of use because it is warped somehow. Which should come as no surprise when one remembers that its architect was the infamous John Poulsen. The Faroese football player? John Poulson (note spelling), 1910-1993, the corrupt architect. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Poulson , with photo of Cannon Street Station! -- Richard J. (to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address) |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard J. wrote:
John Rowland wrote: Paul Terry wrote: In message . com, Mizter T writes The existing 1960's office block on top of Cannon Street was constructed so badly that I understand there is at least one floor that is permanently out of use because it is warped somehow. Which should come as no surprise when one remembers that its architect was the infamous John Poulsen. The Faroese football player? John Poulson (note spelling), 1910-1993, the corrupt architect. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Poulson , with photo of Cannon Street Station! Thanks. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The Cannon Street Boat-Train | London Transport | |||
Cannon Street - Bank OSI or NOSI? | London Transport | |||
What is the point of Cannon Street (National Rail) Station? | London Transport | |||
Cannon Street redevelopment (Cannon Place) | London Transport | |||
A Moorgate to London Bridge Tunnel (Old chestnut) | London Transport |