London Banter

London Banter (https://www.londonbanter.co.uk/forum.php)
-   London Transport (https://www.londonbanter.co.uk/london-transport/)
-   -   Lack of GOBLin connections (https://www.londonbanter.co.uk/london-transport/5915-lack-goblin-connections.html)

Paul Terry November 27th 07 04:23 PM

Lack of GOBLin connections
 
In message , Tom
Anderson writes

On Tue, 27 Nov 2007, Paul Terry wrote:


The GOBLIN, as known today, has existed only since about 1981. It is
an amalgam of various bits of other lines, although the South
Tottenham to Forest Gate section was built in 1894 (at the
encouragement of a property speculator) to join the Midland Railway
with the London, Tilbury and Southend.


Before that bit was built, where did the line go?


The western bit (South Tottenham to Gospel Oak) was part of the
Tottenham and Hampstead Junction railway (terminating at Tottenham Hale
and running into central London).

The eastern end was part of the London, Tilbury and Southend system (in
fact, at one time, most "GOBLIN" services turned west at East Ham
Junction to terminate at East Ham on the LTS, rather than going straight
on to Barking ... while a few went all the way to Southend).

--
Paul Terry

MIG November 27th 07 04:33 PM

Lack of GOBLin connections
 
On 27 Nov, 17:23, Paul Terry wrote:
In message , Tom
Anderson writes

On Tue, 27 Nov 2007, Paul Terry wrote:
The GOBLIN, as known today, has existed only since about 1981. It is
an amalgam of various bits of other lines, although the South
Tottenham to Forest Gate section was built in 1894 (at the
encouragement of a property speculator) to join the Midland Railway
with the London, Tilbury and Southend.

Before that bit was built, where did the line go?


The western bit (South Tottenham to Gospel Oak) was part of the
Tottenham and Hampstead Junction railway (terminating at Tottenham Hale
and running into central London).

The eastern end was part of the London, Tilbury and Southend system (in
fact, at one time, most "GOBLIN" services turned west at East Ham
Junction to terminate at East Ham on the LTS, rather than going straight
on to Barking ... while a few went all the way to Southend).



I'm sure that in a previous thread someone mentioned troop movements
from St Pancras to Tilbury.

Mr Thant November 27th 07 05:01 PM

Lack of GOBLin connections
 
On 27 Nov, 17:15, Tom Anderson wrote:
Er, Blackhorse Road?


Not if you're coming from central London and hurrying to catch a
westbound Goblin. It's only 3 minutes walk from Seven Sisters if you
use the shortcut through the estate, and it'll save you at least 10.

U

--
http://londonconnections.blogspot.com/
A blog about transport projects in London

sweek November 27th 07 05:45 PM

Lack of GOBLin connections
 
Just thought I'd mention that Harringay Green Lanes - Harringay is a
valid and quite an easy interchange; just a short walk up/down the
hill.

Mizter T November 27th 07 06:52 PM

Lack of GOBLin connections
 
On 27 Nov, 17:19, Tom Anderson wrote:
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007, Mizter T wrote:
One useful change not mentioned yet (in this thread at least, though
we've certainly been here before!) is the Upper Holloway to Archway/
Northern line (non-)interchange.


What is the best term for describing such an interchange


Outerchange?

tom


Yes, maybe!

Paul Corfield November 27th 07 07:28 PM

Lack of GOBLin connections
 
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 07:42:17 -0800 (PST), Mizter T
wrote:

One useful change not mentioned yet (in this thread at least, though
we've certainly been here before!) is the Upper Holloway to Archway/
Northern line (non-)interchange.

What is the best term for describing such an interchange - an out-of-
station interchange might be a good one, but in ticketing terminology
that means a journey where a change that involves transfer between
stations on the street can be completed on a single ticket. Using the
phrase 'out-of-station interchange' where through tickets might not be
valid would perhaps just serve to confuse things.


Since PAYG was extended to the Overground there are 3 new valid out of
station interchanges for PAYG purposes. These are

West Hampstead LU / West Hampstead NLL / West Hampstead Thameslink

Upper Holloway / Archway LU

Leytonstone High Road / Leytonstone LU.

--
Paul C


Admits to working for London Underground!

Tim Roll-Pickering November 27th 07 07:33 PM

Lack of GOBLin connections
 
Paul Corfield wrote:

Since PAYG was extended to the Overground there are 3 new valid out of
station interchanges for PAYG purposes. These are


West Hampstead LU / West Hampstead NLL / West Hampstead Thameslink


Upper Holloway / Archway LU


Leytonstone High Road / Leytonstone LU.


Are these valid for non PAYG interchange? (I thought the West Hampsteads
always were.)



John Rowland November 27th 07 07:39 PM

Lack of GOBLin connections
 
wrote:
Hi,
I'm mildly disappointed in the lack of connections the GOBLin line has
with tube lines (very mildly - it's not one of the things that causes
me to lose sleep, but it is a shame.)
It crosses four tube lines (Cebtral, Victoria, Piccadilly and
Northern), yet only connects with one and that's only because the
Victoria line was built to connect with it.
I was wondering, was the GOBLin built after the tube lines? Does
anyone know the rationale behind its route? Have there ever been plans
to connect it with the lines it crosses? Which came first: the GOBLin
or the tube lines?!


No-one seems to have mentioned that the Victoria Line is kind of a
replacement for the Goblin. Whatever journeys would be done with the Goblin
if it had decent interchanges, or used to be done with the "Goblin" when it
ran to St Pancras, are done with the Vic instead. That's not much use if you
live in Crouch Hill or Harringay though.



asdf November 27th 07 07:49 PM

Lack of GOBLin connections
 
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 20:28:27 +0000, Paul Corfield wrote:

Since PAYG was extended to the Overground there are 3 new valid out of
station interchanges for PAYG purposes. These are

West Hampstead LU / West Hampstead NLL / West Hampstead Thameslink


PAYG isn't valid at West Hampstead Thameslink...

[email protected] November 27th 07 08:07 PM

Lack of GOBLin connections
 
On 27 Nov, 20:28, Paul Corfield wrote:
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 07:42:17 -0800 (PST), Mizter T
wrote:

One useful change not mentioned yet (in this thread at least, though
we've certainly been here before!) is the Upper Holloway to Archway/
Northern line (non-)interchange.


What is the best term for describing such an interchange - an out-of-
station interchange might be a good one, but in ticketing terminology
that means a journey where a change that involves transfer between
stations on the street can be completed on a single ticket. Using the
phrase 'out-of-station interchange' where through tickets might not be
valid would perhaps just serve to confuse things.


Since PAYG was extended to the Overground there are 3 new valid out of
station interchanges for PAYG purposes. These are

West Hampstead LU / West Hampstead NLL / West Hampstead Thameslink

Upper Holloway / Archway LU

Leytonstone High Road / Leytonstone LU.

--
Paul C

Admits to working for London Underground!


Where are these out of station interchanges listed? They aren't
always shown on the Tube map etc.

Jonathan


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:56 PM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk