Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Right,
Fanshafting, dialling codes, and now geometry. Melvyn Bragg is currently talking to me about the Golden Ratio [1]: http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/history/...nourtime.shtml One of his contributors has cited railway tickets as an everyday object which is sized according to the Golden Ratio. That ratio is 1:1.618ish; some quick measurements of tickets give me a ratio of ~1.58, which is close but not the same. Does anyone have exact numbers from a specification? Oh, hang on, it's something called ISO 7810: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_7810 Which has a side ratio of 1.5857725083364209ish. Right, that's that sorted. Disregard this. Where did that size come from? It's not an A-series size. tom [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_ratio -- The Gospel is enlightened in interesting ways by reading Beowulf and The Hobbit while listening to Radiohead's Hail to the Thief. To kill a dragon (i.e. Serpent, Smaug, Wolf at the Door) you need 12 (disciples/dwarves) plus one thief (burglar, Hail to the Thief/King/thief in the night), making Christ/Bilbo the 13th Thief. -- Remy Wilkins |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tom Anderson wrote:
Right, Fanshafting, dialling codes, and now geometry. Melvyn Bragg is currently talking to me about the Golden Ratio [1]: http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/history/...nourtime.shtml One of his contributors has cited railway tickets as an everyday object which is sized according to the Golden Ratio. That ratio is 1:1.618ish; some quick measurements of tickets give me a ratio of ~1.58, which is close but not the same. Does anyone have exact numbers from a specification? Oh, hang on, it's something called ISO 7810: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_7810 Which has a side ratio of 1.5857725083364209ish. Right, that's that sorted. Disregard this. Where did that size come from? It's not an A-series size. Well, I notice that 2.125" * 4 = 8.5", which is the standard letter-size paper width in the U.S., and would also be the width of many continuous form printers. -- Michael Hoffman |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 21:49:55 on Thu, 29 Nov 2007 Tom Anderson opined:-
Right, Fanshafting, dialling codes, and now geometry. Melvyn Bragg is currently talking to me about the Golden Ratio [1]: http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/history/...nourtime.shtml One of his contributors has cited railway tickets as an everyday object which is sized according to the Golden Ratio. That ratio is 1:1.618ish; some quick measurements of tickets give me a ratio of ~1.58, which is close but not the same. Does anyone have exact numbers from a specification? Oh, hang on, it's something called ISO 7810: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_7810 Which has a side ratio of 1.5857725083364209ish. Right, that's that sorted. Disregard this. Where did that size come from? It's not an A-series size. No idea. I see that the reference states "The proportion of sides is approximately the golden ratio (1.618:1)." Not that approximate - about 2% out. -- Thoss |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Michael Hoffman" wrote in message ... Tom Anderson wrote: Right, Fanshafting, dialling codes, and now geometry. Melvyn Bragg is currently talking to me about the Golden Ratio [1]: http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/history/...nourtime.shtml One of his contributors has cited railway tickets as an everyday object which is sized according to the Golden Ratio. That ratio is 1:1.618ish; some quick measurements of tickets give me a ratio of ~1.58, which is close but not the same. Does anyone have exact numbers from a specification? Oh, hang on, it's something called ISO 7810: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_7810 Which has a side ratio of 1.5857725083364209ish. Right, that's that sorted. Disregard this. Where did that size come from? It's not an A-series size. Well, I notice that 2.125" * 4 = 8.5", which is the standard letter-size paper width in the U.S., and would also be the width of many continuous form printers. I suggest the ID-1 identification/credit card format derives from business cards printed in a 4x4 layout on foolscap folio, ie 8.5 x 13.5 inches giving 2.125 x 3.375... Paul S |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007, Paul Scott wrote:
"Michael Hoffman" wrote in message ... Oh, hang on, it's something called ISO 7810: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_7810 Which has a side ratio of 1.5857725083364209ish. Right, that's that sorted. Disregard this. Where did that size come from? It's not an A-series size. Well, I notice that 2.125" * 4 = 8.5", which is the standard letter-size paper width in the U.S., and would also be the width of many continuous form printers. I suggest the ID-1 identification/credit card format derives from business cards printed in a 4x4 layout on foolscap folio, ie 8.5 x 13.5 inches giving 2.125 x 3.375... That's got to be it. It's too precise a fit to be anything else. Well spotted! tom -- taxidermy, high tide marks, sabotage, markets, folklore, subverting, . |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
A less pleasant aspect of 'railway photography'? | London Transport | |||
A less pleasant aspect of 'railway photography'? | London Transport | |||
Benefit cost ratio on street signs | London Transport | |||
LU multiple-aspect signalling | London Transport | |||
New(ish) book: "Britain's Historic Railway Buildings: An Oxford Gazetteer of Structures and Sites" | London Transport |