Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008, Mizter T wrote:
On 14 Jan, 18:02, "Paul Scott" wrote: "Mizter T" wrote in message ... Presumably this will all be a bit harder to organise if/when TfL take full responsibility for the line at some time in the future, such as at SSL resignalling? My understanding was that when the Putney to Wimbledon stretch was handed over to LUL at privatisation, there was an agreement reached with regards to continuing 'National Rail' use of the line There was a discussion recently that quoted TfL as saying SWT wouldn't be allowed on the line after resignalling unless they fitted all their stock (that might need to use the line) with trip cocks... I was under the vague impression that the LU SSLs were ditching the whole trip cock system altogether. They are. They just put that restriction in to get a rise out of SWT. tom -- Transform your language. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Overrun of engineering work on the Wimbledon Branch | London Transport | |||
National rail south east - any single engineering works source? | London Transport | |||
Validity of +Any Permnitted during engineering works | London Transport | |||
Planned engineering works | London Transport | |||
Planned engineering works | London Transport |