Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi
Boarding a train at Pimlico going north the southbound trains are on the right if i face the front of the train. Somewhere between Pimlico and Kings Cross they change to being on the left. Where do the lines go over and under each other and is there a tube map published that would give information like this. Thanks Clyde |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 30 Jan, 12:01, "clyde dempster"
wrote: Boarding a train at Pimlico going north the southbound trains are on the right if i face the front of the train. Somewhere between Pimlico and Kings Cross they change to being on the left. Where do the lines go over and under each other and is there a tube map published that would give information like this. Between Oxford Circus and Warren Street and back again between KXSP and Highbury and Islington. It's so that the northbound and southbound tracks are the same sides as the equivalent tracks at Euston, for cross-platform interchange. Here are two maps that show it: http://web.archive.org/web/200603022...s/victoria.jpg http://rodcorp.typepad.com/photos/va..._trackmap.html U -- http://londonconnections.blogspot.com/ A blog about transport projects in London |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message
of Wed, 30 Jan 2008 04:37:13 in uk.transport.london, Mr Thant writes On 30 Jan, 12:01, "clyde dempster" wrote: Boarding a train at Pimlico going north the southbound trains are on the right if i face the front of the train. Somewhere between Pimlico and Kings Cross they change to being on the left. Where do the lines go over and under each other and is there a tube map published that would give information like this. Between Oxford Circus and Warren Street and back again between KXSP and Highbury and Islington. It's so that the northbound and southbound tracks are the same sides as the equivalent tracks at Euston, for cross-platform interchange. Here are two maps that show it: http://web.archive.org/web/200603022...net/~cambronj/ lu/track_schematics/victoria.jpg I find that unusable. Is there anything that will scale up a .JPG file. Answering my own question: not in IE, save the file and open in the standard "Windows picture and fax viewer" which has zoom controls. http://rodcorp.typepad.com/photos/va..._trackmap.html That is good! I prefer the diagram in http://www.davros.org:80/rail/culg/victoria.html#layout. Sadly, Clive lacks the time to complete his astounding work. He has diagrams for Bakerloo, Central, Circle, Metropolitan, Victoria and Waterloo & City lines. He has text for Croydon Tramlink, District, East London, Hammersmith & City, Jubilee, Northern and Piccadilly lines. I am not yet able to decode the text with ease. I misread the Baker Street Bakerloo Southbound platform number as 5. It is actually 8. OTOH, Jubilee N is 10 but displays as zero. Talking about Baker Street, I NOW have a tactic for catching the first Eastbound train. I wait in the main ticket hall inside the gateline above platform 5 - I should have known THAT Bakerloo platform could not be 5 - male toilets are on 5. I look at the display. I wait until an H&C or Circle shows (never more than 1 minute before arrival) or a Met service is within 2 minutes of arrival. -- Walter Briscoe |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Walter Briscoe wrote:
In message of Wed, 30 Jan 2008 04:37:13 in uk.transport.london, Mr Thant Here are two maps that show it: http://web.archive.org/web/200603022...net/~cambronj/ lu/track_schematics/victoria.jpg I find that unusable. Is there anything that will scale up a .JPG file. Just click on it (in IE). |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 30, 2:01*pm, Walter Briscoe
wrote: In message of Wed, 30 Jan 2008 04:37:13 in uk.transport.london, Mr Thant writes On 30 Jan, 12:01, "clyde dempster" wrote: Boarding a train at Pimlico going north the southbound trains are on the right if i face the front of the train. Somewhere between Pimlico and Kings Cross they change to being on the left. Where do the lines go over and under each other and is there a tube map published that would give information like this. Between Oxford Circus and Warren Street and back again between KXSP and Highbury and Islington. It's so that the northbound and southbound tracks are the same sides as the equivalent tracks at Euston, for cross-platform interchange. Here are two maps that show it: http://web.archive.org/web/200603022...net/~cambronj/ lu/track_schematics/victoria.jpg I find that unusable. Is there anything that will scale up a .JPG file. Answering my own question: not in IE, save the file and open in the standard "Windows picture and fax viewer" which has zoom controls. http://rodcorp.typepad.com/photos/va..._trackmap.html That is good! I prefer the diagram in http://www.davros.org:80/rail/culg/victoria.html#layout. I wonder why the Victoria northbound goes over the Bakerloo, before diving under the Northern, which goes under the Central, which goes under the Bakerloo ... There's a famous 3D diagram of Oxford Circus station which shows the northbound Victoria line going, plausibly but incorrectly, under the Bakerloo. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 30, 12:37 pm, Mr Thant
wrote: On 30 Jan, 12:01, "clyde dempster" wrote: Boarding a train at Pimlico going north the southbound trains are on the right if i face the front of the train. Somewhere between Pimlico and Kings Cross they change to being on the left. Where do the lines go over and under each other and is there a tube map published that would give information like this. Between Oxford Circus and Warren Street and back again between KXSP and Highbury and Islington. It's so that the northbound and southbound tracks are the same sides as the equivalent tracks at Euston, for cross-platform interchange. Here are two maps that show it:http://web.archive.org/web/200603022..._trackmap.html U --http://londonconnections.blogspot.com/ A blog about transport projects in London I suppose that explains the Northern Line's movement from left to right between Moorgate & Bank until after Kennington. It must be to make connections easier. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 30 Jan, 18:39, Offramp wrote:
I suppose that explains the Northern Line's movement from left to right between Moorgate & Bank until after Kennington. It must be to make connections easier. Er, the Northern Line switches back at Borough-ish, and is due to the way the original crossing of the Thames to King William Street (near Bank) was built, though it's a very long story. If the lines need to switch at Euston because the northbound Northern is going west while the northbound Victoria is going east. That's not the case at Stockwell and Kennington. U -- http://londonconnections.blogspot.com/ A blog about transport projects in London |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message of Wed, 30 Jan 2008
14:24:51 in uk.transport.london, John Rowland writes Walter Briscoe wrote: In message of Wed, 30 Jan 2008 04:37:13 in uk.transport.london, Mr Thant Here are two maps that show it: http://web.archive.org/web/200603022...net/~cambronj/ lu/track_schematics/victoria.jpg I find that unusable. Is there anything that will scale up a .JPG file. Just click on it (in IE). Thanks, John. I had failed to note the cursor change to a magnifying glass. When I use it, it flips to a shrinking glass. My right-click was ineffective. -- Walter Briscoe |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I suppose that explains the Northern Line's movement from left to
right between Moorgate & Bank until after Kennington. ... Er, the Northern Line switches back at Borough-ish, and is due to the way the original crossing of the Thames to King William Street (near Bank) was built, Correct. though it's a very long story. If so, it's a long story that is not given in any book I have seen and which nobody has previously been able to provide in this newsgroup, for example in this thread from 2004: http://groups.google.com/group/uk.tr...b65292fba60522 If you have an explanation, I'd like to see it, and the source. To save time, here's the background: this section was originally built by the City & South London Railway. They first intended to build a cable-powered tube railway from King William Street to Elephant & Castle, then got authority to extend south to Stockwell. During construction management changed their minds and opted for electric locomotives. The whole route from King William Steet to Stockwell opened in 1890. The north end of the line was built west of London Bridge, curving sharply round under Arthur Street with the King William Street terminus on a more or less east-west alignment. The station was too small and in 1900 both the station and the existing under-river crossing were closed and the line rerouted onto its present, straighter alignment (east of London Bridge) to a new terminus at Moorgate, with new intermediate stops at London Bridge and Bank. Now, the original route had the two tunnels crossing over between Elephant & Castle and Borough, and since that section was never replaced, they still do. So it's this part that needs to be explained. As I said in the 2004 thread, "Rails Through the Clay" just says that it's "related to the original intention to use cable haulage", and that's not exactly an explanation. (The return to the normal left-hand running is between Bank and Moorgate, on the section opened in 1900. The curve under Arthur Street approaching the old King William Street station had one track above the other, so it didn't constrain any other part of the line.) -- Mark Brader, Toronto | "You can write a small letter to Grandma | in the filename." -- Forbes Burkowski My text in this article is in the public domain. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 30 Jan, 23:29, (Mark Brader) wrote:
If you have an explanation, I'd like to see it, and the source. The most detailed explanation I've seen is this one from a very hardcore expert: http://districtdave.proboards39.com/...e=1#1163453810 The gist is the tunnels were built in stages with no real plan, and it was very late on that a decision was taken to make the tunnel with the shallowest gradient up to King William Street the northbound one, which also happened to be the one on the right crossing the Thames. (btw a while ago someone on here asked where exactly the lines cross back at the north end. Judging purely by the forces exerted on my arse, the southbound crosses over the northbound immediately south of Moorgate) U -- http://londonconnections.blogspot.com/ A blog about transport projects in London |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Is the victoria line the new misery line? | London Transport | |||
Kings Cross Main line to Victoria Line? | London Transport | |||
What happened on the Victoria line yesterday? | London Transport | |||
Victoria Line This Morning | London Transport | |||
Announce: 'Building London's Victoria Line': BTF on DVD | London Transport |