Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm sorry if this is a bit of a stupid questions, but by Wimbledon
loop do people mean the one with Sutton on it, right? What's the one from Clapham Junction to Richmond, Kingston and Wimbledon called then? |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
sweek wrote:
I'm sorry if this is a bit of a stupid questions, but by Wimbledon loop do people mean the one with Sutton on it, right? Yes. What's the one from Clapham Junction to Richmond, Kingston and Wimbledon called then? The Kingston loop I think. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() On 11 Apr, 18:13, "Tim Roll-Pickering" wrote: sweek wrote: I'm sorry if this is a bit of a stupid questions, but by Wimbledon loop do people mean the one with Sutton on it, right? Yes. It variously gets called the Wimbledon Loop, the Sutton Loop and the Sutton/Wimbledon (or indeed Wimbledon/Sutton) Loop. All the same thing. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message
, Mizter T writes On 11 Apr, 18:13, "Tim Roll-Pickering" wrote: sweek wrote: I'm sorry if this is a bit of a stupid questions, but by Wimbledon loop do people mean the one with Sutton on it, right? Yes. It variously gets called the Wimbledon Loop, the Sutton Loop and the Sutton/Wimbledon (or indeed Wimbledon/Sutton) Loop. All the same thing. One delightful idiosyncrasy is that to get to Sutton direct from Blackfriars you take a train indicated to Wimbledon, and vice versa. -- Dave N |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 12, 12:00 am, Dave Nesbitt
wrote: One delightful idiosyncrasy is that to get to Sutton direct from Blackfriars you take a train indicated to Wimbledon, and vice versa. This is one of these cases where the departure boards at Blackfriars should probably lie about the destination, by giving 'St Helier via Sutton' and 'Morden South via Wimbledon' (or whatever pair of stations works out to be the best advice) as the destinations. -- Abi |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Abigail Brady wrote: On Apr 12, 12:00 am, Dave Nesbitt wrote: One delightful idiosyncrasy is that to get to Sutton direct from Blackfriars you take a train indicated to Wimbledon, and vice versa. This is one of these cases where the departure boards at Blackfriars should probably lie about the destination, by giving 'St Helier via Sutton' and 'Morden South via Wimbledon' (or whatever pair of stations works out to be the best advice) as the destinations. They do something similar with the Cambridge slows at KX, giving "Foxton" as the destination (last station before Cambridge). |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 12 Apr, 13:32, Sarah Brown
wrote: In article , Abigail Brady wrote: On Apr 12, 12:00 am, Dave Nesbitt wrote: One delightful idiosyncrasy is that to get to Sutton direct from Blackfriars you take a train indicated to Wimbledon, and vice versa. This is one of these cases where the departure boards at Blackfriars should probably lie about the destination, by giving 'St Helier via Sutton' and 'Morden South via Wimbledon' (or whatever pair of stations works out to be the best advice) as the destinations. They do something similar with the Cambridge slows at KX, giving "Foxton" as the destination (last station before Cambridge). Which I long suspected was the case...but it only ever came up during a service disruption, when I decided to get confirmation from a member of staff before jumping aboard the only train going north for the foreseeable future. I noticed they do it on the GWML as well, with slow London-bound services advertising as terminating at Ealing Broadway instead of Paddington. Makes sense....as long as people know it's an advisory of destination and not where the train actually terminates. ![]() |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sarah Brown wrote:
In article , Abigail Brady wrote: On Apr 12, 12:00 am, Dave Nesbitt wrote: One delightful idiosyncrasy is that to get to Sutton direct from Blackfriars you take a train indicated to Wimbledon, and vice versa. This is one of these cases where the departure boards at Blackfriars should probably lie about the destination, by giving 'St Helier via Sutton' and 'Morden South via Wimbledon' (or whatever pair of stations works out to be the best advice) as the destinations. They do something similar with the Cambridge slows at KX, giving "Foxton" as the destination (last station before Cambridge). Rather irritatingly, this is not done consistently. I have been at Kings Cross where a stopper has been advertised as Cambridge, when an Ely train overtakes it (about a month ago). I don't know how they determine which trains to advertise as Foxton and which as Cambridge. Robin |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Abigail Brady wrote:
On Apr 12, 12:00 am, Dave Nesbitt wrote: One delightful idiosyncrasy is that to get to Sutton direct from Blackfriars you take a train indicated to Wimbledon, and vice versa. This is one of these cases where the departure boards at Blackfriars should probably lie about the destination, by giving 'St Helier via Sutton' and 'Morden South via Wimbledon' (or whatever pair of stations works out to be the best advice) as the destinations. There will be several stations for which the best train from Blackfriars will be the next loop train regardless of direction. If they reduce the service frequency enough, this would cover the entire loop, removing all confusion. ;-) |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Thameslink loop map confusion | London Transport | |||
Morden to Sutton - still possible? | London Transport | |||
Old depot in Sutton St E1 | London Transport |